Bombshell: FBI wrongly told agents Trump-Russia collusion claims had come from DOJ

Grokmaster

Well-known member
Contributor
LIE ,AFTER LIE, AFTER LIE ,AS THE SEDITIONISTS CONTINUED THEIR CRIMES...WAS THERE ANYONE IN THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN, OBAMA INTELL LEFTOVERS, AND DNC LEADRERSHIP WHO WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY???.





FBI wrongly told its agents Trump-Russia collusion claims had come from DOJ, bombshell document reveals





WASHINGTON
FBI agents probing since-debunked claims of a secret back channel between Donald Trump and a Russian bank believed that the allegations had originated with the Department of Justice — when in fact they came from Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann, who had shopped them to the bureau’s then-general counsel days earlier.

In the latest revelation to emerge from Sussmann’s trial in DC federal court on a count of lying to the FBI, special counsel John Durham’s prosecutors revealed that investigators had received an electronic communication citing a referral from the DOJ “on or about” Sept. 19, 2016, the same day Sussmann met with James Baker, then the FBI’s top lawyer.

The document, a record of the investigation being opened by agents Curtis Heide and Allison Sands and dated Sept. 23, 2016, did not mention Sussmann as the source of the allegations.


“In that referral, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE provided the FBI with a white paper that was produced by an anonymous third party,” the communication said, before adding: “According to the white paper, a U.S.-based server that is owned by the TRUMP ORGANIZATION has been communicating with the Russian-based ALFA BANK organization in Moscow, Russia.”

The document was circulated to several top FBI officials — including Peter Strzok, who oversaw the probe of Clinton’s email server as well as the Trump-Russia investigation, and was famously fired from the bureau in 2018 after the emergence of text messages he sent to his colleague and mistress Lisa Page in which he vowed to help “stop” Trump from winning the White House.


Prosecutors then introduced a series of emails from agents in the Chicago field office who were investigating or overseeing the matter and requesting they be given access to the source.

In one Oct. 3, 2016, email, agent Heide wrote to Gaynor, “We really want to interview the source of all this information. Any way we can track down who this guy is and how we’re getting this information?”

Supervisory Special Agent Daniel Wierzbicki followed up: “An interview with the source of information … may allow us to understand the ‘what’ and ‘why’ of the white paper.”

Gaynor responded that it was being discussed at headquarters, but did not provide the identity of the source.

On Monday, he said he might have come to a different conclusion about the hold hindering the investigation if he had known Sussmann was acting as an attorney for the Clinton campaign when he turned over the information.




https://nypost.com/2022/05/23/fbi-t...-source-was-from-doj-not-clinton-tied-lawyer/
 
That's pretty funny, Murdoch has to make sure he gets the right dog whistles in his article, "Peter Strzok," like he is major player in any of this charade

The whole thing is an attempted deflection, Durham knows that the January 6th Committee is going to come out with some pretty embarassing things on Trump so all of this is intended to give the right wing media enough circumstantial evidence to initiate and pound innuendos that Trump is a victim and everyone is picking on him
 
That's pretty funny, Murdoch has to make sure he gets the right dog whistles in his article, "Peter Strzok," like he is major player in any of this charade

The whole thing is an attempted deflection, Durham knows that the January 6th Committee is going to come out with some pretty embarassing things on Trump so all of this is intended to give the right wing media enough circumstantial evidence to initiate and pound innuendos that Trump is a victim and everyone is picking on him
indictments are not deflections. Durham doesnt GAF about 1/6 - he's doing his job

Trump was a victim of the Russian Hoax - if you dont get that by now.. Clinton did it, and the FBI continued
after the Obama meeting when Biden said "Logans Act" on Flynn
Comeystole documents and turned over a thump drive to his friend to get a Special Counsel
while Page said they had "no evidence" of any collusion ( conspiracy with Russia)

You can hide your head in the sand. Clinton started this fake colusion by paying Steele
Sussman and Nelli Ohr ed it to a willing 7th floor..and even Weissmann - a scurrilous dog - couldn't find collusion

and this is just one facet -add in Kliensmith and Fake FISA, spying on Page while the CIA knew he was their asset
It just goes on and on and they all have dirty hands
 
LIE ,AFTER LIE, AFTER LIE ,AS THE SEDITIONISTS CONTINUED THEIR CRIMES...WAS THERE ANYONE IN THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN, OBAMA INTELL LEFTOVERS, AND DNC LEADRERSHIP WHO WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY???.





FBI wrongly told its agents Trump-Russia collusion claims had come from DOJ, bombshell document reveals





WASHINGTON
FBI agents probing since-debunked claims of a secret back channel between Donald Trump and a Russian bank believed that the allegations had originated with the Department of Justice — when in fact they came from Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann, who had shopped them to the bureau’s then-general counsel days earlier.

In the latest revelation to emerge from Sussmann’s trial in DC federal court on a count of lying to the FBI, special counsel John Durham’s prosecutors revealed that investigators had received an electronic communication citing a referral from the DOJ “on or about” Sept. 19, 2016, the same day Sussmann met with James Baker, then the FBI’s top lawyer.

The document, a record of the investigation being opened by agents Curtis Heide and Allison Sands and dated Sept. 23, 2016, did not mention Sussmann as the source of the allegations.


“In that referral, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE provided the FBI with a white paper that was produced by an anonymous third party,” the communication said, before adding: “According to the white paper, a U.S.-based server that is owned by the TRUMP ORGANIZATION has been communicating with the Russian-based ALFA BANK organization in Moscow, Russia.”

The document was circulated to several top FBI officials — including Peter Strzok, who oversaw the probe of Clinton’s email server as well as the Trump-Russia investigation, and was famously fired from the bureau in 2018 after the emergence of text messages he sent to his colleague and mistress Lisa Page in which he vowed to help “stop” Trump from winning the White House.


Prosecutors then introduced a series of emails from agents in the Chicago field office who were investigating or overseeing the matter and requesting they be given access to the source.

In one Oct. 3, 2016, email, agent Heide wrote to Gaynor, “We really want to interview the source of all this information. Any way we can track down who this guy is and how we’re getting this information?”

Supervisory Special Agent Daniel Wierzbicki followed up: “An interview with the source of information … may allow us to understand the ‘what’ and ‘why’ of the white paper.”

Gaynor responded that it was being discussed at headquarters, but did not provide the identity of the source.

On Monday, he said he might have come to a different conclusion about the hold hindering the investigation if he had known Sussmann was acting as an attorney for the Clinton campaign when he turned over the information.




https://nypost.com/2022/05/23/fbi-t...-source-was-from-doj-not-clinton-tied-lawyer/

fake-news-hero-img.jpg
 
That's pretty funny, Murdoch has to make sure he gets the right dog whistles in his article, "Peter Strzok," like he is major player in any of this charade

The whole thing is an attempted deflection, Durham knows that the January 6th Committee is going to come out with some pretty embarassing things on Trump so all of this is intended to give the right wing media enough circumstantial evidence to initiate and pound innuendos that Trump is a victim and everyone is picking on him

That's pretty funny, how desperately you try to deflect from the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY OF LIES by HILLAR, HER CAMPAIGN, THE FBI, THE DOJ, THE OBAMA LEFTOVERS, AND THE FAKE NEWS ,WITH YOUR SILLIASS, LITTLE GIRL BULLSHIT.

NO ONE, AND I MEAN NO ONE, GIVES A FUCK ABOUT JAN. 06, WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DURHAM'S PROBE.
 
That's pretty funny, how desperately you try to deflect from the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY OF LIES by HILLAR, HER CAMPAIGN, THE FBI, THE DOJ, THE OBAMA LEFTOVERS, AND THE FAKE NEWS ,WITH YOUR SILLIASS, LITTLE GIRL BULLSHIT.

Right, we have been hearing the same bullshit for close to six years, and now, the big "bombshell" the savior is pursuing to prove it all true is going after a secondary figure for the procedural crime of lying to the FBI
 
Right, we have been hearing the same bullshit for close to six years, and now, the big "bombshell" the savior is pursuing to prove it all true is going after a secondary figure for the procedural crime of lying to the FBI

THE RUSSIA LIES WENT ON FOR THREE+ YEARS, WITH INVOLEMENT FROM EVERY PART OF THE DNC, OBAMA ADM. AND HILLARY CAMPAIGN....AND IF YOU THINK THIS IS A TRIAL ABOUT A "PROCEDURAL CRIME"....YOU ARE DUMBER THAN WE ALREADY THINK YOU ARE.

THIS IS JUST A BRICK IN THE WALL...AND LOOK AT WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY UNCOVERED:

THE LIE THAT HILLARY WAS NOT INVOLVED; THE FACT THAT THE ENTIRE TRUMP/RUSSIA NARRATIVE WAS A COMPLETE MADEUP PACK OF LIES, THAT THE CONSPIRATORS LIED TO THE FISA COURT ABOUT TO ILLEGALLY SPY ON A CANDIDATE, AND THEN THE POTUS.

"PROCEDURAL CRIME".....:laugh:
 
THE RUSSIA LIES WENT ON FOR THREE+ YEARS, WITH INVOLEMENT FROM EVERY PQR TOF THE DNC, OBAMA ADM. AND HILLARY CAMPAIGN....AND IF YOU THINK THIS IS A TRIAL ABOUT A "PROCEDURAL CRIME"....YOU ARE DUMBER THAN WE ALREADY THINK YOU ARE.

THIS IS JUST A BRICK IN THE WALL...

Ah, is Durham not prosecuting the guy for lying to the FBI, a procedural crime? That the best he is going to accomplish here is finding the guy guilty of lying to the FBI?

NEXT
 
Ah, is Durham not prosecuting the guy for lying to the FBI, a procedural crime? That the best he is going to accomplish here is finding the guy guilty of lying to the FBI?

NEXT

TRY TO KEEP UP; THAT'S JUST HIS FOOT IN THE DOOR.


HE IS A REKNOWNED EXPERT AT THIS UNLIKE THE BUFFOON MUELLER.
 
That's pretty funny, how desperately you try to deflect from the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY OF LIES by HILLAR, HER CAMPAIGN, THE FBI, THE DOJ, THE OBAMA LEFTOVERS, AND THE FAKE NEWS ,WITH YOUR SILLIASS, LITTLE GIRL BULLSHIT.

NO ONE, AND I MEAN NO ONE, GIVES A FUCK ABOUT JAN. 06, WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DURHAM'S PROBE.

So you want us to forget about an attempted insurrection by US citizens on the Capitol?
 
TRY TO KEEP UP; THAT'S JUST HIS FOOT IN THE DOOR.


HE IS A REKNOWNED EXPERT AT THIS UNLIKE THE BUFFOON MUELLER.

Oh, his foot has been in the door for over three years now, so if he nabs Sussmann for the procedural crime is he next going to go after some secretary for destroying a memo?

Wake up and stop being so gullible, as I said, it is all just a deflection in anticipation of the January 6th Committee's final report, Fox and the like have to have some alternate narrative to run in contrast for the lemmings, and that it Durham's job to provide the innuendos to build conspiracies, your citing Murdoch several times here proves it
 
Ah, is Durham not prosecuting the guy for lying to the FBI, a procedural crime? That the best he is going to accomplish here is finding the guy guilty of lying to the FBI?

NEXT
And confusing Trumpublicans into thinking this is a big deal.
 
And confusing Trumpublicans into thinking this is a big deal.
LMAO. The Clinton campaign hires a foreign operative to manufacture a narative, the FBI soon realizes it's fake, but they continue with fake FISA and double down with a Special Prosecutor all the while knowing they had no evidence and it continued to target a sitting president
ya that's a damn big deal
 
That's pretty funny, Murdoch has to make sure he gets the right dog whistles in his article, "Peter Strzok," like he is major player in any of this charade

The whole thing is an attempted deflection, Durham knows that the January 6th Committee is going to come out with some pretty embarassing things on Trump so all of this is intended to give the right wing media enough circumstantial evidence to initiate and pound innuendos that Trump is a victim and everyone is picking on him
why are demmycrat crimes a Republican deflection?.....
 
LMAO. The Clinton campaign hires a foreign operative to manufacture a narative, the FBI soon realizes it's fake, but they continue with fake FISA and double down with a Special Prosecutor all the while knowing they had no evidence and it continued to target a sitting president
ya that's a damn big deal

nope......just another Monday......
 
Back
Top