Clarence Thomas is one of the 'most corrupt justices in American history,'

Mina said:
What makes you think that?
Click to expand...

precedent. the bar you have to cross is this

“an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.”

actual legal scholars - not the partisan doucebags you will line up - understand interests don't mean a rooting interest

in your own words - explain Ginny's interest in Bognet v. Boockvar

we will do this case by case - and like all our debates, I will kick your ass because you are a retard
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Most corrupt in HISTORY. Which part of "history" aren't you getting? The argument isn't about most corrupt today but in HISTORY. Your argument is a strawman.
Click to expand...

If your argument was "Clarence Thomas was not yet the most corrupt Supreme Court justice as of 2014," a 2014 article that declined to mention him among the worst justices would be decent support for that. But since the corruption he is most often called out for post-dates that article, it isn't a very strong argument for saying Thomas, today, isn't the most corrupt. That's the point I was making.

I see you're struggling here with basic reasoning skills. Let's change the context a bit, to one where your partisan political blindness won't hurt your brain so much. Let's say someone argued that Steph Curry was the greatest three-point shooter ever and you responded with a link to an article that listed four players in contention for that honor, but made no mention of Curry. Say you imagined that bolstered your argument he wasn't the greatest ever.... but say that article was from 2014. Now, obviously, the reasonable response would be to point out that in 2014 he hadn't yet done much of what now gets him listed as the greatest 3-pointer ever. These days, he's pretty much the consensus pick.
 
gemini104104 said:
Well it would have been great for Faux propaganda network to not lay all the focus of a corrupt repuke SCOTUS influence on Thomas, considering tRump and his seditious repuke insurgency lawlessly hacked two repukes in there who are not qualified to be on SCOTUS for numerous felonious reasons why. This in order to carry out tRump and his repuke mob war efforts against Democracy, society and humanity. The other repuke and Thomas were already there as a terrible problem before tRump and his gutter mob were lawlessly hacked in 2017:

The Nation justice correspondent Elie Mystal insisted on MSNBC's The Connection with Tiffany Cross on Saturday that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is one of the "most corrupt justices in American history."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...sedgntp&cvid=a501d971230842459616724036bf1ae6
Click to expand...
:dasracist::dasracist::dasracist::dasracist::dasracist::dasracist:
 
zymurgy said:
precedent. the bar you have to cross is this

“an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.”
Click to expand...

She has an interest in remaining out of prison, and that could be substantially affected by the matters being litigated.


in your own words - explain Ginny's interest in Bognet v. Boockvar
Click to expand...

It's Trump v. Thompson that I'm talking about. But nice try attempting to assign a position to me. I'd imagine that when someone's debate skills are as weak as yours, it's extremely important to be allowed to assign positions to potential opponents.
 
Mina said:
She has an interest in remaining out of prison, and that could be substantially affected by the matters being litigated.
Click to expand...

cuckoo. cuckoo. she is not on trial and never will be

It's Trump v. Thompson that I'm talking about. But nice try attempting to assign a position to me. I'd imagine that when someone's debate skills are as weak as yours, it's extremely important to be allowed to assign positions to potential opponents.
Click to expand...

ok - focus on that one tardo. How does Trump’s claims of executive privilege over records from his presidency impact Ginny's texts?

She is not seeking executive privilege or attorney-client confidentiality. Nothing in her texts relate to any of these cases or issues.

You just proved you don't understand the interest provision that would require his recusal.
 
zymurgy said:
cuckoo. cuckoo. she is not on trial and never will be
Click to expand...

With her corrupt husband running interference, I'm assuming you're right. But an ethical judge doesn't just recuse himself from trials where spouses are actual charged in a crime.

How does Trump’s claims of executive privilege over records from his presidency impact Ginny's texts?
Click to expand...

I didn't say they impacted her texts. Again, you're attempting to assign a position to me. Have you not picked up on the fact I don't fall for that bullshit? I get that you're a coward, but do you have to call such attention to it?
 
Mina said:
With her corrupt husband running interference, I'm assuming you're right. But an ethical judge doesn't just recuse himself from trials where spouses are actual charged in a crime.
Click to expand...

No charges have been filed against her - and even the biggest shit stains are just saying he should be recused. to claim a criminal element here shows how far on a limb you extremists are. you are crazier than Trump's attorneys at this point :laugh:

I didn't say they impacted her texts. Again, you're attempting to assign a position to me.
Click to expand...

You refuse to actually say anything of relevance. in your own words - explain how that case interests her in a manner that goes beyond what she wants to happen (rooting interest)
 
zymurgy said:
No charges have been filed against her....
Click to expand...

... and with hubby running interference on document requests, it's unlikely that will change.

in your own words - explain how that case interests her in a manner that goes beyond what she wants to happen (rooting interest)
Click to expand...

Sure. The case involves whether or not discovery can be thwarted -- discovery related to a deadly criminal attack on our nation, where we know the justice's wife, at minimum, had a planning role in setting the stage for the day's events. If she did anything illegal or even just unethical or subject to civil liability, she has an interest in keeping those communications secret. So does Justice Thomas, so he'll make sure he stays in a position to influence that for his wife.
 
Mina said:
... and with hubby running interference on document requests, it's unlikely that will change.
Click to expand...

again - the trial he refused to recused himself for has zero to do with her texts. so retarded strike 1

Sure. The case involves whether or not discovery can be thwarted -- discovery related to a deadly criminal attack on our nation, where we know the justice's wife, at minimum, had a planning role in setting the stage for the day's events. If she did anything illegal or even just unethical or subject to civil liability, she has an interest in keeping those communications secret. So does Justice Thomas, so he'll make sure he stays in a position to influence that for his wife.
Click to expand...

again - the trial he refused to recused himself for has zero to do with her texts. the discovery is related to executive executive privilege between the president and his lawyer. she is not his lawyer, and her texts have nothing to do with that case so retarded strike 2
 
Last edited:
zymurgy said:
again - the trial he refused to recused himself for has zero to do with her texts. so retarded strike 1



again - the trial he refused to recused himself for has zero to do with her texts. so retarded strike 2
Click to expand...

I didn't say a thing about her texts. I know you'd love to assign positions to me, but as you can see, you're really bad at trying to slip that by me. Do you have any smarter friends you could run this stuff by before posting?
 
Mina said:
I didn't say a thing about her texts. I know you'd love to assign positions to me, but as you can see, you're really bad at trying to slip that by me. Do you have any smarter friends you could run this stuff by before posting?
Click to expand...

because you are too stupid to see you are losing, you assume you are not losing. :laugh:

any documents she authored are not part of that case. you are failing to show how she has any interest in the case - outside of a rooting interest
 
a-png.996740
 
zymurgy said:
because you are too stupid to see you are losing, you assume you are not losing. :laugh:

any documents she authored are not part of that case. you are failing to show how she has any interest in the case - outside of a rooting interest
Click to expand...

If any of those documents concern her role in planning the event, and show any knowledge of planned illegal activities, that would very much be something she and her husband would want to keep away from the public.
 
Mina said:
If any of those documents concern her role in planning the event, and show any knowledge of planned illegal activities, that would very much be something she and her husband would want to keep away from the public.
Click to expand...

any of what documents?

every SCOTUS judge must recuse from every case himself because you fear a potential future document that nobody currently is aware of that might show the judges wife had a real interest in the case.

I have heard of slippery slopes, but this one takes the case.
 
gemini104104 said:
Well it would have been great for Faux propaganda network to not lay all the focus of a corrupt repuke SCOTUS influence on Thomas, considering tRump and his seditious repuke insurgency lawlessly hacked two repukes in there who are not qualified to be on SCOTUS for numerous felonious reasons why. This in order to carry out tRump and his repuke mob war efforts against Democracy, society and humanity. The other repuke and Thomas were already there as a terrible problem before tRump and his gutter mob were lawlessly hacked in 2017:

The Nation justice correspondent Elie Mystal insisted on MSNBC's The Cross Connection with Tiffany Cross on Saturday that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is one of the "most corrupt justices in American history."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...sedgntp&cvid=a501d971230842459616724036bf1ae6
Click to expand...

Yeah because you know,....its not like you are a "cyborg" bot or anything. :rolleyes: Say hi to Xi for us while you are at it..
 
gemini104104 said:
Well it would have been great for Faux propaganda network to not lay all the focus of a corrupt repuke SCOTUS influence on Thomas, considering tRump and his seditious repuke insurgency lawlessly hacked two repukes in there who are not qualified to be on SCOTUS for numerous felonious reasons why. This in order to carry out tRump and his repuke mob war efforts against Democracy, society and humanity. The other repuke and Thomas were already there as a terrible problem before tRump and his gutter mob were lawlessly hacked in 2017:

The Nation justice correspondent Elie Mystal insisted on MSNBC's The Cross Connection with Tiffany Cross on Saturday that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is one of the "most corrupt justices in American history."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...sedgntp&cvid=a501d971230842459616724036bf1ae6
Click to expand...

PLEASE SPECIFY WHAT "CORRUPTION" JUSTICE THOMAS IS GUILTY OF.

YOUR ASININE, RACE-BAITING, LEFTIDIOT SOURCE FAILED TO DO SO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top