WinsomeSears Sends Messageto to Commonwealth...Enforce the Law, Damit

E

Earl

Well-known member
WinsomeSears Sends Messageto to Commonwealth...Enforce the Law, Damit

@WinsomeSears
Silence doesn't guarantee safety. The mob may come for you. The Commonwealth Attorney has the power to prosecute the individuals picketing and protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS Justices. The Commonwealth Attorney is supposed to enforce the law. #everforward #LG42 #Winsome

@WinsomeSears
Silence doesn't guarantee safety. The mob may come for you. The Commonwealth Attorney has the power to prosecute the individuals picketing and protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS Justices. The Commonwealth Attorney is supposed to enforce the law. #everforward #LG42 #Winsome


https://citizenfreepress.com/breaki...s-message-to-state-ag-enforce-the-law-damnit/
 
18 U.S.C. § 1507 (subsection numbers added),

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or
with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,
pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or
in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or
with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

A similar provision focused just on picketing outside courts (equivalent to subsection 3 above) was upheld in Cox v. Louisiana (1965); and the logic of that decision would apply equally to residential picketing (subsection 4 above). [UPDATE: Note that U.S. v. Grace (1983), struck down a total ban on demonstrations near the Supreme Court; but the law there was "not limited to expressive activities that are intended to interfere with, obstruct, or impede the administration of justice," as Justice Marshall's separate opinion noted.] Here is Cox's logic, which was set forth in a protest of an impending trial, but which I think would apply to protests of an impending appellate decision as well:
 
Earl said:
WinsomeSears Sends Messageto to Commonwealth...Enforce the Law, Damit

@WinsomeSears
Silence doesn't guarantee safety. The mob may come for you. The Commonwealth Attorney has the power to prosecute the individuals picketing and protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS Justices. The Commonwealth Attorney is supposed to enforce the law. #everforward #LG42 #Winsome

@WinsomeSears
Silence doesn't guarantee safety. The mob may come for you. The Commonwealth Attorney has the power to prosecute the individuals picketing and protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS Justices. The Commonwealth Attorney is supposed to enforce the law. #everforward #LG42 #Winsome


https://citizenfreepress.com/breaki...s-message-to-state-ag-enforce-the-law-damnit/
Click to expand...

This is actually also a consideration for the Federal Marshalls who are charged with enforcing Federal Law.

The lawless Biden Administration is restraining them from doing their jobs in violation of their oaths and in violation of the law.
 
Code1211 said:
This is actually also a consideration for the Federal Marshalls who are charged with enforcing Federal Law.

The lawless Biden Administration is restraining them from doing their jobs in violation of their oaths and in violation of the law.
Click to expand...

Indeed and in violation of Slow Joe’s oath of office.

Before he enters on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:— "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Our laws are based on the Constitution.
 
Last edited:
After November, Slow Joe, who has violated his oath of office, can be impeached 1-2-10 times,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top