I walk to work often...

Why is even FOX ignoring this blockbuster of a story? Probably because it is built 90 per cent on speculation and 100 per cent on so what as far fraud is concerned. There is no showing that the ballots were illegal. They would have been counted even if "2000 Mules" had debuted before election day.
ballot harvesting itself is illegal in most states because its ripe for fraud
why are you defending this practice?
 
We're a nation of over 300 million. That's called an irregularity. You could say every election has been illegal based on that logic.

But beyond that: YOU LIED. Rana did not "admit" that the election was "illegal." You simply made that up.
irregularity?
that's a nice word for fostering fraud

should ballot harvesting be illegal??
 
translation:

either neocon neocon warmongers or the fast disappearing neverTrumps
Kinzinger and Cheney are toast

Please. There are actually conservatives who are not "warmongers" who find Trump's narcissism absolutely disgusting and simply can't support him.

It's so lazy to say they're all warmongers, or RINO's. The only reason that Kinzinger or Cheney are "toast" is because the party is still run by the cult. Wiser heads will prevail eventually.
 
irregularity?
that's a nice word for fostering fraud

should ballot harvesting be illegal??

I think the rules are fine. Ballots aren't counted if they're illegal.

And there are hundreds of irregularities every single election. No election is perfect. The question to ask is: is it enough to tip the scales? That has been assessed w/ every election, and the amount of actual fraud/irregularity is statistically zilch.
 
Yes, I did, but D’Souza and the True the vote haven’t proven anything, if they had evidence, they would sue and present it in court. Another tell, Fox won’t touch it.
lol

the same courts that wouldn't hear ANYTHING about the gross violation of Sec of States of state legislature
(Texas vs. PA)
it's not able to change the results
it's a settled issue
 
I think the rules are fine. Ballots aren't counted if they're illegal.

And there are hundreds of irregularities every single election. No election is perfect. The question to ask is: is it enough to tip the scales? That has been assessed w/ every election, and the amount of actual fraud/irregularity is statistically zilch.
so to be CLEAR you oppose and support making ballot harvesting illegal
towards that end do you support hardening of the process to cameras, monitored drop boxes while ID
and requiring signature verification for requests,and purging roles of non-voting voters?
 
I think the rules are fine. Ballots aren't counted if they're illegal.

And there are hundreds of irregularities every single election. No election is perfect. The question to ask is: is it enough to tip the scales? That has been assessed w/ every election, and the amount of actual fraud/irregularity is statistically zilch.
This is what they forget, ballots are verified, even when they are dropped by others.
 
Please. There are actually conservatives who are not "warmongers" who find Trump's narcissism absolutely disgusting and simply can't support him.

It's so lazy to say they're all warmongers, or RINO's. The only reason that Kinzinger or Cheney are "toast" is because the party is still run by the cult. Wiser heads will prevail eventually.
ROFL
you are describing NeverTrumps "damn those mean tweets"
You should look at Trumps endorsements - overwhelmingly sought after and wining the primaries

Trump may fade - but populism expressed as America first is the new Party
Now to dump McConnell

I agree the warmongers are in both parties
 
This is what they forget, ballots are verified, even when they are dropped by others.
LMAO what is "verified"
there is a reason ballot harvesting is illegal. California excepted (of course) chain of custody,
pressuring voters to vote the way they want and turning ballots over to harvesters
Or just collecting blank ballots by threat or reward
 
ballot harvesting itself is illegal in most states because its ripe for fraud
why are you defending this practice?

I didn't defend the practice. I called your attention to the law, which punishes the harvester not the voter.
 
I didn't defend the practice. I called your attention to the law, which punishes the harvester not the voter.
not what i sussed out of your post -but OK

for the life of me i dont understand why anyone other then the voter is allowed to return a ballot
Stick it in the mail if you cant get to a drop box..

....but i digress
 
We're a nation of over 300 million. That's called an irregularity. You could say every election has been illegal based on that logic.

But beyond that: YOU LIED. Rana did not "admit" that the election was "illegal." You simply made that up.

sad you cunts can't even say the word "illegal" when something is illegal....it is not "irregular"........your bowels are irregular.....if something violates the law it is illegal.......
 
LMAO what is "verified"
there is a reason ballot harvesting is illegal. California excepted (of course) chain of custody,
pressuring voters to vote the way they want and turning ballots over to harvesters
Or just collecting blank ballots by threat or reward
They movie shows none people who were in vegetated states that voted much to the surprise of their families.
 
I think the rules are fine. Ballots aren't counted if they're illegal.

And there are hundreds of irregularities every single election. No election is perfect. The question to ask is: is it enough to tip the scales? That has been assessed w/ every election, and the amount of actual fraud/irregularity is statistically zilch.

when an election is won by 44,000 votes it only takes 45,000 "irregularities" to create an illegitimate result......
 
Back
Top