I walk to work often...

Never heard of the daily signal.

Just viewed that page, tripe. As good as Politico.
well there are lots of reviews.. you dont trust Politico either??
they are the ones that published the leaked draft opinion from SCOTUS
 
ANY investigation starts off with a premise...duh.. and from what i've read the GPS hit and some video evidence stand alone
You can say it's untrue - but how do you refute this evidence?

A premise, yes - but not an agenda.

This all reminds me so much of the Iraq War, where they decided to invade, and then cherrypicked the evidence they needed to justify a case for war. I remember a staffer in Colin Powell's office said he was given a "chinese menu" of intel, and told to make the case for war.

This is the same. That's different from starting w/ a premise.
 
This morning, as its one of the last few cool mornings of the season here in South Florida, I walked to work.

I was thinking about the silly U-Tube movie 200 mules. As I was thinking about it, I realized I was walking past what was once a Biden Campaign headquarters office, just a little space in a small group of offices along the sidewalk. I realized that if there had been a ballot drop box on my rout and Florida had been contested, my cell phone would be counted as one of the Mules. In October and November I walk the same rout 50-70 times a month. I drive that rout another 50 - 70 times a month. Its a half mile from my house.

Do you see how easily you are fooled.
are you pretending you didn't file a thousand absentee ballots?.......by the way, a drop box at a Biden campaign headquarters would have been an obvious violation of the law.......
 
A premise, yes - but not an agenda.

This all reminds me so much of the Iraq War, where they decided to invade, and then cherrypicked the evidence they needed to justify a case for war. I remember a staffer in Colin Powell's office said he was given a "chinese menu" of intel, and told to make the case for war.

This is the same. That's different from starting w/ a premise.
damn I swear..
in the Iraq war there was countervailing evidence..it was never presented
there is no countervailing evidence here..
 
True the Vote discovered that, in the five states, some 2,000 mules averaged 38 drop-box visits in the weeks before Election Day, and estimates that 380,000 fraudulent ballots resulted. Coming from heavily Democrat areas, these almost certainly were overwhelmingly pro-Biden ballots.

—In Arizona, 200 mules typically approached 20 boxes each. Disqualifying these 20,000 unlawful ballots would evaporate Biden’s 10,457-vote win in Arizona.

—In Georgia, 250 mules stopped at 24 boxes and inserted five ballots per encounter. Rejecting these 30,000 illegal votes would eliminate Biden’s victory margin of 11,779.

—In Pennsylvania, 1,100 mules in Philadelphia alone encountered 50 boxes. Vacating these 275,000 illegitimate votes would eradicate Biden’s 80,555-vote victory.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/04/29/film-2000-mules-offers-vivid-proof-of-voter-fraud/

Why is even FOX ignoring this blockbuster of a story? Probably because it is built 90 per cent on speculation and 100 per cent on so what as far fraud is concerned. There is no showing that the ballots were illegal. They would have been counted even if "2000 Mules" had debuted before election day.
 
Why is even FOX ignoring this blockbuster of a story? Probably because it is built 90 per cent on speculation and 100 per cent on so what as far fraud is concerned. There is no showing that the ballots were illegal. They would have been counted even if "2000 Mules" had debuted before election day.
Ballots that are cast illegally are illegal ballots. There is no train of custody and anyone could falsify them.
 
Yeah, the fact checkers are playing with statistics. Did you know that ballot drop boxes are required to have cameras?
Yes, I did, but D’Souza and the True the vote haven’t proven anything, if they had evidence, they would sue and present it in court. Another tell, Fox won’t touch it.
 
Politically, I don't think anything drives me more crazy than the Big Lie.

Because it's so easy to see what's happening from an objective viewpoint. This is just one narcissist's escape fantasy. That's it. And he got millions of Americans to buy in.

And now, it has undermined the integrity of our elections for what could be an indefinite period of time. Who knows if millions will ever believe in them again - at least when "their guy" loses. It's changed the whole dynamic, and in a way that threatens our republic more than any foreign aggressor or external threat.

Classic "boy who cried wolf" (and he did in '12 and '16 also). But in this case, the boy has a cult that makes up at least a third of American voters.
 
Yes, I did, but D’Souza and the True the vote haven’t proven anything, if they had evidence, they would sue and present it in court. Another tell, Fox won’t touch it.

if you acknowledge the fact that the required cameras were not always present then obviously you must agree the drop boxes have been proven to be illegal.....I wonder what we should call an election conducted illegally......
 
she just conceded that the drop boxes did not have the security cameras required by law.......

We're a nation of over 300 million. That's called an irregularity. You could say every election has been illegal based on that logic.

But beyond that: YOU LIED. Rana did not "admit" that the election was "illegal." You simply made that up.
 
Back
Top