You're argument is flawed. The Taliban, like it or not, was the legitimate government of Afghanistan on September 11, 2001. No government can govern with out the consent of the governed. The Taliban gave it's tacit support to Bin Ladin and Al Qaida who organized and executed the attacks on America. They were given the ultimatum to turn over those responsible for those attacks and refused. That made the Taliban government of the nation of Afghanistan, with certainty, a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States.
The taliban offered to give bin ladin to a neutral third country, and bush rejected it. We wanted blood, and there was nothing that was going to stop it. Let's be honest about that. Because I had those same blood lust feelings for a few months after 9/11
Bin ladin is a folk hero in afghanistan. The taliban weren't going to cave 100% to bush's demands. But, I strongly suspect that if we gave them some way to save face, it could have been resolved without half a trillion dollars and a hundred thousand dead people.
The taliban weren't in league with bin ladin's international terrorist agenda. They didn't know anything about the 9/11 attacks, and they certainly weren't involved in the plot. From what I've read, the taliban are a bunch of whacked out xenophobes with simple regional goals. I've never heard anyone make the credible case they they had intentions or designs on attacking the united states let alone wandering outside the confines of their regional concerns.
I don't think their alliance with bin ladin was anything more than simple muslim solidarity with a folk hero who helped drive the soviets from their lands. I don't even think they really cared that much if we assassinated him, as long as they could be seen as looking the other way while we did it. I think it's self evident that we wanted a war, we wanted to invade, we wanted to kick ass. And we weren't going to settle for the hard work of geopolitical intrigue or law enforcement to bring bin ladin to justice. And I blame myself as well for engaging in blood lust.
This alone was more then adequate on both national defense and moral grounds to use military force to defend our nation from the clear and present danger they presented towards our nation. The only purpose our occupation of Afghanistan serves is to restructure their nation, as we did in Germany and Japan, to assure that they no longer present such a threat to our nation ever again. This was the most substantial failing of the Bush administration. By dropping the ball and distracting the nation with Iraq, which was not a clear and present danger, the objectives of our military intervention and occupation of Afghanistan were grossly undermined. Now victory in Afghanistan may be unatainable unless our nation decides to make the major sacrifices required.
The war on terror cannot be won. It's to ambiguous and open ended and was based on an, as we now know, a discredited academic strategy of pre-emption. The war against Afghanistan was, essentially won, based on limited military objectives until Bush snatched defeat out from the jaws of victory.
I still don't understand how a war to get bin ladin became a nine year war against the taliban.
I would bet you a month's salary that if and when we kill bin ladin, it's going to be through covert ops or law enforcement. Our 9 year occupation of afghanistant won't have anything to do with it. Because he's probably not even in afghanistan.
You know what bothers me matt? I'm hearing the same things I heard about the iraq war. We have to stay to stabilize it, just six more months, freedom on the march. Its the same slogans that I never fell for on Iraq. And my bullshit meter is pegging on max.
Afghanistan isn't japan or germany. Those were cohesive nations that had experience with democratic institutions and represnetative government. They weren't really that alien, by our standards. And that was a total war. We inflicted so much pain on them, they had no choice but to submit. They were faced with virutal annihilation. Are we really going to fire bomb kabul, and engage in total war? I don't think so.
The bottom line, is that I don't think this occupation serves any purpose. Unless our original mission to get al qaeda has somehow morphed into some never ending war against some taliban whackos that never engaged in international terrorism.
When we finally deal with al qaeda, and bring them to justice, or kill them, it won't be because we had an army sitting around in afghanistan for ten years.
Last edited: