BartenderElite
Verified User
The argument from the left is that they are "banning" abortions. Flail some more.![]()
They will in some states.
But you said Roe isn't being overturned. It is.
This is fun.
The argument from the left is that they are "banning" abortions. Flail some more.![]()
Yes, it is being reversed. NO, it is not banning per the loony left. Try to keep up Popeye.![]()
No one is overturning abortion or banning it meathead. Try to stay on point or just STFU.![]()
Yes, it is being reversed. NO, it is not banning per the loony left. Try to keep up Popeye.![]()
lying sack of shit said:NOTHING is being overturned you uneducated dolt.
They will in some states.
But you said Roe isn't being overturned. It is.
This is fun.

Roe is being overturned.

.........and REMANDED back to the states per article X of the Constitution. Nothing is being banned as the shrill dumbasses on the left are claiming, yourself included.![]()
hey shit stain - I quoted you denying the use of the term overturn. so fuck off you lying piece of shit
wipe the egg off your face - then the shit off. then fuck off
Again, stop the lying. R v W isn't being overturned.
Here ya go.
Agreed. What’s next? Reverse the 13th Amendment? Gay marriage?
Public trust in SCOTUS is down to 40% and, after all of this, I expect it to be a lot lower. The Tea Party AKA Alt-Right got their wish: Americans are losing trust in their own government.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/354908/approval-supreme-court-down-new-low.aspx
![]()
THERE IS NO AMENDMENT PROTECTING ABORTION, DUMBFUCK = THE POINT.
Notice they have no comment here.
If you are pro-life, and Roe v. Wade is overturned...
Would you support a governor for President who did not do all he could do to attain an outright ban? After all that means he supports "murder of innocent babies", right?
If you are pro-life, and Roe v. Wade is overturned...
Would you support a governor for President who did not do all he could do to attain an outright ban? After all that means he supports "murder of innocent babies", right?
I am pro-life when considering this question at the level of the individual regarding whether or not a living, unborn human is a living human or not a living human.
I support the availability of abortion within our society because our society refuses to care for the unwanted new borns. This reality is a shockingly horrifying reality.
It is possible to to not be imprisoned by the idea that there is only one of two possible, very limited and limiting positions with no nuance or ability implied to discuss options.
Are you confined to the prison of two ideas?
I feel that it is important to accept the realities that this topic presents and the shortcomings, weaknesses and injustices of our society that it reveals.
Tactics employed to end discussion instead of explore options are not useful.
If you are pro-life, and Roe v. Wade is overturned...
Would you support a governor for President who did not do all he could do to attain an outright ban? After all that means he supports "murder of innocent babies", right?
You ask that someone address the OP. OK, I will take as direct of an approach as I can.
If DeSantis is the Repubilican nominee and he runs against Biden, I will vote for DeSantis. As I see it the options are:
1. Vote for Biden with whom I disagree on a myriad of issues, two of which are extremely impportant to me, who would, no doubt, make abortion much more accessible.
2. Vote for DeSantis, with whom I agree on several issues, and even though he might not want to outright ban abortion, I do not believe he will do anything to make it more accessible.
3. Not vote.
I am sure that most "progressives" would rather pro-life people choose option 1 or 3 but I ain't gonna.