GOP talking point: if you oppose SCOTUS decision, you're against democracy

[BartenderElite]

So what happens when contraceptives and birth control didn't work?

SOL, I'd guess.

 

[AProudLefty]

because there is no unalienable right to murder ones children, already born or not.

Are you aware that infanticide is illegal, right?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Why should it? Rights are inherent. How someone became pregnant, what their thought process was at the time, how aware they were, how they view abortion - none of that matters to the rights that they have.

so having a right to keep and bear arms should alleviate my responsibility if I kill or injure someone with them. understood.

 

[BartenderElite]

You do not understand that the leaked abortion decision validates that the right to abortion is not a Constitutional right...hence, it is not an enumerated right and the states prevail.

Why does the leaked decision have more weight than the actual decision made decades ago?

 

[Earl]

He's posted that he is not a democrat before.

I didn't believe him then.

 

[BartenderElite]

so having a right to keep and bear arms should alleviate my responsibility if I kill or injure someone with them. understood.

Do you consider that to be a logical comparison?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

So what happens when contraceptives and birth control didn't work?

you should KNOW that they are not 100%. you took a risk, it failed, so now you must be responsible for your decision

 

[BartenderElite]

He's posted that he is not a democrat before.

I didn't believe him then.

Oh, no. Earl doesn't believe me.

I vote Dem more than Republican. But I'm not a Dem.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

when we declare war - we know with a large possibility that someone will die. shouldn't it be illegal to declare wars knowing the ramifications under this logic?

how can something SPECIFICALLY written in the Constitution be illegal?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Are you aware that infanticide is illegal, right?

and yet you're trying to say it IS legal

 

[AProudLefty]

where did you get the understanding that 'unborn children' do not exist?

child
/CHīld/
Learn to pronounce
noun
plural noun: children

a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.

You're welcome.

 

[Earl]

Why does the leaked decision have more weight than the actual decision made decades ago?

Because a bad "settled law" has been corrected.

The original Roe vs. Wade was bad settled law.

 

[Truth Detector]

You sound upset about the "overturning Roe" thing from the other thread.

You look stupid about the "overturning Roe" thing from the other thread.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Do you consider that to be a logical comparison?

you are claiming that 'rights are inherent', thus relieving you of responsibility if you exercise them.............so yes, it is a logical comparison

 

[zymurgy]

how can something SPECIFICALLY written in the Constitution be illegal?

the original one - or the spaghetti mess that came about when we incorporated?

 

[AProudLefty]

and yet you're trying to say it IS legal

No it isn't legal.

 

[BartenderElite]

Because a bad "settled law" has been corrected.

The original Roe vs. Wade was bad settled law.

I say that the new decision is "bad."

Maybe a future court will correct it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

child
/CHīld/
Learn to pronounce
noun
plural noun: children

a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.

You're welcome.

and a child still developing in the womb is below the age of puberty and below the legal age of majority

you're welcome

 

[BartenderElite]

You look stupid about the "overturning Roe" thing from the other thread.

Nope. You said that it wasn't overturned, then said it was. On the same thread.

 

[Truth Detector]

Why does the leaked decision have more weight than the actual decision made decades ago?

Why are you asking this of Conservatives? It's the loon leftists on YOUR side that are having conniptions over a leaked draft. Are you upset over this leak? Are you okay with the caustic, divisive and dangerous rhetoric coming from the Democratic Party of the Lying Jackasses?