Trying to get religiously inclined people not to vote for Desantis, huh?
No, I am simply interested in how many would support a Pro-Life Candidate if he does not promote a ban. If its murder...
If you are Pro-Life???
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
No, I am simply interested in how many would support a Pro-Life Candidate if he does not promote a ban. If its murder...
Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.
You just described the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses halfwit.
Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Again, stop the lying. R v W isn't being overturned. It's being remanded back to the states where it should have stayed. Jurists cannot fabricate law from the flimsiest of constitutional arguments.
Um - that's called overturning.
Many abortionists are pro-control. Not saying all - but many. You might want to brush up on your complete and utter lack of knowledge on the Bible.
Life is a gift from God. (Genesis 9:6; Psalm 36:9) He considers all life to be precious, including the life of a child in the womb. So if someone intentionally kills an unborn child, that amounts to murder.
God’s Law to the Israelites stated: “If men should struggle with each other and they hurt a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but no fatality results, the offender must pay the damages imposed on him by the husband of the woman; and he must pay it through the judges. But if a fatality does occur, then you must give life for life.”—Exodus 21:22, 23. *
I am constantly amused by the very leftists now bloviating about privacy rights that DEMANDED EVERYONE get an experimental shot at risk of losing their jobs and livelihoods.
You cannot invent the lunacy, the stupidity and the hypocrisy that oozes out of leftists pores.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Many abortionists are pro-control. Not saying all - but many. You might want to brush up on your complete and utter lack of knowledge on the Bible.
Life is a gift from God. (Genesis 9:6; Psalm 36:9) He considers all life to be precious, including the life of a child in the womb. So if someone intentionally kills an unborn child, that amounts to murder.
God’s Law to the Israelites stated: “If men should struggle with each other and they hurt a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but no fatality results, the offender must pay the damages imposed on him by the husband of the woman; and he must pay it through the judges. But if a fatality does occur, then you must give life for life.”—Exodus 21:22, 23. *
I am constantly amused by the very leftists now bloviating about privacy rights that DEMANDED EVERYONE get an experimental shot at risk of losing their jobs and livelihoods.
You cannot invent the lunacy, the stupidity and the hypocrisy that oozes out of leftists pores.
So, God is pro-death penalty too?
Who knew?
For idiots like you who lack intelligence and suffer from extremely tiny brains - STFU OK?
^Amusing. A clueless leftist hack who didn't believe in privacy rights when it came to experimental shots now declaring it for unfettered abortions.
hypocrite
[ hip-uh-krit ]
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
Partisan hack
"Partisan hack", also called political hack, is a pejorative term describing a person who is part of the political party apparatus, but whose intentions are more aligned with victory than personal conviction. The term "hired gun" is often used in tandem to further describe the moral bankruptcy of the "hack".
BartenderElite
Verified User
Next, we'll hear that God railed against cancel culture and kneeling during the anthem...
de·flect (dĭ-flĕkt′)
To turn aside or cause to turn aside; bend or deviate.
flail (flāl)
n.
To wave or swing vigorously; thrash: flailed my arms to get their attention.
To move vigorously or erratically; thrash about: arms flailing helplessly in the water.
To strike or lash out violently
half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person
weak sauce
noun
US slang
: something inferior, ineffective, or unimpressive : something weak
straw man
noun
1: a weak or imaginary opposition (such as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
For idiots like you who lack intelligence and suffer from extremely tiny brains - STFU OK?
^Amusing. A clueless leftist hack who didn't believe in privacy rights when it came to experimental shots now declaring it for unfettered abortions.
hypocrite
[ hip-uh-krit ]
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
Partisan hack
"Partisan hack", also called political hack, is a pejorative term describing a person who is part of the political party apparatus, but whose intentions are more aligned with victory than personal conviction. The term "hired gun" is often used in tandem to further describe the moral bankruptcy of the "hack".
Didn't read!
Just so you will know!
I never read the comments of proven idiots- OR ASSHOLES!
Exodus 21:24
Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Exodus 21:23-25
But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
Leviticus 24:20
Fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; whatever injury he has given a person shall be given to him.
Exodus 21:12
“Whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death.
Leviticus 24:17
“Whoever takes a human life shall surely be put to death.
Try to be less of an uneducated moron.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Exodus 21:24
Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Exodus 21:23-25
But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
Leviticus 24:20
Fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; whatever injury he has given a person shall be given to him.
Exodus 21:12
“Whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death.
Leviticus 24:17
“Whoever takes a human life shall surely be put to death.
Try to be less of an uneducated moron.
He doesn't sound like much of a pro-lifer.
Of course you didn't. You prefer to wallow in ignorance and stupidity. Typical lefty.
Irony from someone who is a proven idiot, asshole and liar.
BartenderElite
Verified User
It is being overturned, btw.
NOTHING is being overturned you uneducated dolt. It is being remanded back to the States.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
No, it isn't you uneducated dullard.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
BartenderElite
Verified User
No, it isn't you uneducated dullard.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Yes, it absolutely is. You're correct that the decision then goes to the states - but it only goes to the states because the original Roe precedent is overturned by the Court.
How can you not know this? That's pretty amazing.
the prior decision is being reversed - aka overturnedNo, it isn't you uneducated dullard.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.