My leaker prediction - someone on Thomas's staff

Leading theory' is conservative clerk leaked abortion opinion

"The leading theory is a conservative clerk who was afraid that one of the conservatives might be persuaded by Chief Justice Roberts to join a much more moderate opinion," Totenberg said during an appearance Sunday on ABC's This Week.

"There's another theory that it was an outraged liberal clerk, but I think the only one that makes sense is that it came from somebody who was afraid this majority might not hold — that Chief Justice Roberts might persuade one of the conservatives to come over to him," Totenberg added.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...id=EMMX&cvid=daec0af31c664b789871aae17d2680db

Interesting theory. Time will tell who it was…and I do believe the leaker will be revealed.
 
I doubt they will find “the leaker”

Disagreed since the integrity of SCOTUS is at stake.

That said, while the leaker may be found, that doesn’t mean their name will be revealed. Just something like the PAO stating “the source of the leak has been discovered and corrective measures have been taken”.
 
Disagreed since the integrity of SCOTUS is at stake.

That said, while the leaker may be found, that doesn’t mean their name will be revealed. Just something like the PAO stating “the source of the leak has been discovered and corrective measures have been taken”.

It appears they can’t even find the evidence on Trump
 
It appears they can’t even find the evidence on Trump

They have the evidence; they just don’t want to use it because a good portion of the Pedo Party would be incriminating themselves before the midterms.
 
They have the evidence; they just don’t want to use it because a good portion of the Pedo Party would be incriminating themselves before the midterms.

So you think the Democrats don’t want to use the evidence? Which one is the pedo party?
 
So you think the Democrats don’t want to use the evidence? Which one is the pedo party?
Of course they do, but Congress is split. The problem isn’t the evidence, it’s the votes. Consider the TWO impeachments. Plenty of evidence there but what happened?

Here’s a hint: The leader of the Pedo Party is Pedo Don.

2m8x1n.jpg
 
Anyone thought about this? Who is retiring from the court next month? Who's taking his clerks and staff with him so that BLM lady can bring her's in? Occam's razor people! Occam's razor!

I'm not saying breyer did it, or even that he knew about it. I'm theorizing that one of his daring young pirate clerks did this thinking that regardless of he/she/it getting caught, it would be brilliant for their career, say as a future LA district attorney in the mold of that asshole george gascon.
 
Of course they do, but Congress is split. The problem isn’t the evidence, it’s the votes. Consider the TWO impeachments. Plenty of evidence there but what happened?

Here’s a hint: The leader of the Pedo Party is Pedo Don.

2m8x1n.jpg


So what about Garland? He doesn’t care about how Congress votes, he only cares about a jury.
 
I doubt they will find “the leaker”

why?.....there aren't that many possibilities......one of what, maybe 100 people?......I expect there are already a dozen or more who already know who it is......how long can the libs keep a secret......remember how hard they tried to keep the name of Ashley's murderer a secret......
 
No.. I don’t think H intentionally did anything nefarious.
How about illegal?

Specifically, do you believe Hillary intentionally violated classified material protocols or was she just stupid? Negligent as Comey mentioned?
 
How about illegal?

Specifically, do you believe Hillary intentionally violated classified material protocols or was she just stupid? Negligent as Comey mentioned?

It appears it was negligent, and not for personal profit. It could have been arrogance., but not for personal profit.
 
Back
Top