It appears we have no right to privacy!

PostmodernProphet said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Now you're babbling nonsense. How is FREEDOM OF CHOICE fascism? And since there are no children being killed after birth and you have rules & regulations as to when abortions cannot be performed, you question is based on sheer ignorance.

Oh, and when you bring "demons" into the conversation, that's theology. And remember, in this country we have separation of church and state (so says the Constitution). So you have NO standing in that respect because NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO DO ANYTHING BEYOND YOUR PERSONAL RELIGIOUS BELIEFS IN THIS RESPECT.

Got that, bunky?
Click to expand...




gosh, where did I get the idea that killing children was fascist......perhaps it had something to do with Auschwitz.......
Click to expand...

GOSH, how could you come up with such a stupid retort.

Choice is not fascism, dimwit. Fascist don't allow choice.

And once again for the lying Christo-fascists out there....Roe vs. Wade does NOT endorse, advocate or allow for a birthed child to be murdered. Period.
Without emergency medical procedures PRE-MATURE BIRTHS WOULD INEVITABLY END IN DEATH.

Got that, bunky? If not, put on your socks & shoes, toddle down to your nearest hospital and get a nurse to explain it to you.
 
This guy says it best.


Stop abortion at the source. Vasectomies are reversible. Make every young man have one. when he's deemed financially & emotionally fit to be a father it will be reversed. What's that? Did the idea of regulating a man's body make you uncomfortable? Then mind your fucking business!

- Stephen Szczerba
 
Stone said:
I have taken care of my own, I have taken care of others own as well at times. Doesnt make me some great guy either,....I just know that all children deserve to be loved, supported, and taken care of.
Click to expand...

Of course they do- but children grow to be adults who must be taken care of too.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
gosh, where did I get the idea that killing children was fascist......perhaps it had something to do with Auschwitz.......
Click to expand...

....or more recently- Gaza.


https://www.irishtimes.com/news/wor...he-gaza-conflict-s-youngest-victims-1.4579262

They were only children: The Gaza conflict’s youngest victims
At least 69 children were killed in the Israel-Hamas war this month. This is who they were

image.jpg
Click to expand...

Now call them ' sand-niggers ', asshole.
 
Hello Jarod,

Jarod said:
I hope that people realize they only have that super majority because of shenaagns, done the way the Constitution is designed, Roe would not be close to being overturned.
Click to expand...

I don't know what more it will take to motivate liberals to get involved and vote. How can we impress upon people the importance of it? It's mind boggling. The only reason the right is able to get away with this is liberal apathy. There are simply lots of liberals who do not bother to vote. That's the problem. The right gets people to vote. The left doesn't. Why?

The right has hatred as a powerful motivator. It drives them to the polls. They can't wait to vote against what they think is 'destroying America,' or 'stealing your country away from you.'

They've got their heads pretty far up a shady place, but rationality is not a factor. The basic deciding difference is getting people motivated to vote. Hatred does it. Compassion and making tough decisions that benefit society do not.

What the left needs is some kind of super-emotional reason to get involved. What is there?

I think liberals are happier, so they feel no reason to go to great effort to be a part of great historic change. Happiness and apathy are well acquainted.

The right is all pissed off, so they DEFINITELY want to change things. We got gay marriage and Obamacare and they are pissed about it. And we want to save the world from climate disaster and they are pissed about it, terrified of the consequences if we DO anything about it, not if we DON'T, as any rational well informed person would be.

This is nuts. We humans are torn between overpopulating the world to death or simply destroying the habitat, and here we squabble about what, in the big picture, is very low priority stuff. National borders, who belongs where, and whether a pregnant female may make decisions affecting both her and her unborn fetus, which as far as I am concerned is part of her own body until there is a separation, a part that night have rudimentary brain function, but isn't even able to contemplate life nor wonder how long it might last.

The last thing the world needs is more humans. Who goes around saying the world needs more humans? 'Oh! There it is. Don't you see it? All of our problems would be solved if only there were more of us here on this planet. YES!'

:eyeroll:

Reminds me of the gun argument.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Jarod,



I don't know what more it will take to motivate liberals to get involved and vote. How can we impress upon people the importance of it? It's mind boggling. The only reason the right is able to get away with this is liberal apathy. There are simply lots of liberals who do not bother to vote. That's the problem. The right gets people to vote. The left doesn't. Why?

The right has hatred as a powerful motivator. It drives them to the polls. They can't wait to vote against what they think is 'destroying America,' or 'stealing your country away from you.'

They've got their heads pretty far up a shady place, but rationality is not a factor. The basic deciding difference is getting people motivated to vote. Hatred does it. Compassion and making tough decisions that benefit society do not.

What the left needs is some kind of super-emotional reason to get involved. What is there?

I think liberals are happier, so they feel no reason to go to great effort to be a part of great historic change. Happiness and apathy are well acquainted.

The right is all pissed off, so they DEFINITELY want to change things. We got gay marriage and Obamacare and they are pissed about it. And we want to save the world from climate disaster and they are pissed about it, terrified of the consequences if we DO anything about it, not if we DON'T, as any rational well informed person would be.

This is nuts. We humans are torn between overpopulating the world to death or simply destroying the habitat, and here we squabble about what, in the big picture, is very low priority stuff. National borders, who belongs where, and whether a pregnant female may make decisions affecting both her and her unborn fetus, which as far as I am concerned is part of her own body until there is a separation, a part that night have rudimentary brain function, but isn't even able to contemplate life nor wonder how long it might last.

The last thing the world needs is more humans. Who goes around saying the world needs more humans? 'Oh! There it is. Don't you see it? All of our problems would be solved if only there were more of us here on this planet. YES!'

:eyeroll:

Reminds me of the gun argument.
Click to expand...

Liberals are at a serious disadvantage, because we are too open minded and likely to give other ideas a go. Something new like Trump comes up and he attracts a percent of anti-establishment liberals who take a while to see how establishment he really is.

Conservatives supported both Bush and Trump simply because of the “R”, even they are hugely different politically.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
Is liberals are at a serious disadvantage, because we are too open minded and likely to give other ideas a go. Something new like Trump comes up and he attracts a percent of anti-establishment liberals who take a while to see how establishment he really is.

Conservatives supported both Bush and Trump simply because of the “R”, even they are hugely different politically.
Click to expand...

"Is liberals are at a serious disadvantage, because we are too open minded..."

Good grief, take a redial English Grammar course.
 
Jarod said:
Liberals are at a serious disadvantage, because we are too open minded and likely to give other ideas a go. Something new like Trump comes up and he attracts a percent of anti-establishment liberals who take a while to see how establishment he really is.

Conservatives supported both Bush and Trump simply because of the “R”, even they are hugely different politically.
Click to expand...

trump and bush are polar opposites.

bush was a neocon globalist warmonger and the left loves him now.
 
Hello Jarod,

Jarod said:
Liberals are at a serious disadvantage, because we are too open minded and likely to give other ideas a go. Something new like Trump comes up and he attracts a percent of anti-establishment liberals who take a while to see how establishment he really is.

Conservatives supported both Bush and Trump simply because of the “R”, even they are hugely different politically.
Click to expand...

When somebody can be a multi-millionaire for pretending to be a journalist, but basically just cramming fear down the throats of the right, what do we expect?
 
We live in times where allowing a child to be born into this pigshit world is probably the greater sin, not abortion.

Just read some of the opinions on this forum and then tell me that this nation isn't in desperate need of a huge political purge.

We needed Sanders or Warren to kick some serious ass, not fucking Biden.
The POTUS has an army and the SCOTUS doesn't.
If the Supreme Court, led by Republican appointed justices, fucks up, Biden doesn't have the balls to tell them to shove their opinions up their asses.

No nation has ever been in greater need of a left wing political junta more than America is right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top