SCOTUS opinion leaked: Roe v Wade

TOP said:
Hopefully they waste no time with this investigation...If by chance it is "Amit", that's not going to look very good on the resume....this wasn't the plan of some lowly clerk, though....
Click to expand...
Indeed.

Each S.C. Employee who had access to the draft should be required to take a polygraph.

Sotomayor is probably the one who planned it.
 
Earl said:
Indeed.

Each S.C. Employee who had access to the draft should be required to take a polygraph.

Sotomayor is probably the one who planned it.
Click to expand...
We need Penelope Garcia...and the rest of the crew to interview them all....lol...they'd be done in an hour....
 
Making abortion a legal right throughout the country is one of, if not the most important decisions made, that turned the ideology of our country from a people that honor and respect each individual human life to an ideology lacking morality and encompassing personal selfishness.

It's not lost on me that we also had a time in our history where other human lives were not respected, but as the moral people of society fought to eradicate such injustice and ideology, freeing slaves and the minds of individuals who were lacking a moral and righteous compass, evil once again infiltrated itself into society with the mind twist to kill babies instead of a certain ethnicity, race, or sex.

It is no coincidence that the ideology of abortion rights over human rights, is linked to the overall selfish me, me, me, generations that have been created.

Of course I believe the outlawing murder for all is the righteous decision for a country, but at the very least, to reverse Roe v wade, would allow a people within a state to democratically choose what kind of society they want to be part of. The Roe decision stole the right of people within every state in the country to choose a society that would protect and respect ALL human life. The Roe decision forced a self absorbed ideology on our country and our children without exception. People of a state that choose abortion to be legal will retain that option. Sovereign states.

Slavery was legal. It was NOT right. Abortion is currently legal, it is NOT right. The federal government has been raising our children to believe wiping out a human life is optional, acceptable and just fine if the child relies on your body for life. It took time for the government to convince all new generations, by law, that enslaving other humans is wrong. This will take time too.

Additionally I do believe it is not controlling or infringing on a woman's right to do what they want with their own body, to make it illegal to kill a child. Nothing wrong with creating a society that will say, "Sorry, you are not allowed to kill your child. It's against the law." It is horrible and sad that a woman would feel that killing her child is okay and morally legitimate.
 
christiefan915 said:
I believe for trump it was abortions, plural, and that he's really not against them; it's just his way of pandering to evangelicals. trump wanted Marla to have an abortion but she defied him. Maybe that's why he pays so little attention to Tiffany.
Click to expand...
She should be thankful :laugh:
 
christiefan915 said:
"Let’s start with this: A woman’s egg is only fertile for about two days each month. Yes, there are exceptions, because nature. But one egg which is fertile two days each month is the baseline. And those fertile eggs are produced for a limited number of years. This means, on average, women are fertile for about 24 days per year.

But men are fertile 365 days a year. In fact, if you’re a man who ejaculates multiple times a day, you could cause multiple pregnancies daily. In theory, a man could cause 1000+ unwanted pregnancies in just one year. While it’s true that sperm gets crappier as men age, it doesn’t have a fertility expiration date; men can cause unwanted pregnancies from puberty until death. So, starting with basic fertility stats and the calendar, it’s easy to see that men are the issue here."
Click to expand...

All true. Therefore, if the goal is to stop abortions, all males should be mandated to have vasectomies at age 11. They can only be reversed once he's got a good job, a residence, and is legally married. ;)
 
8158e3adc8769c8a-jpg.986305
 
FreeSpeech1789 said:
Once again state law already prohibited abortion and once again they needed a specific law because federal law was specifically written to protect the "right" of abortion by denying personhood status to the unborn. Are you saying that people didn't have personhood until the federal statute against murder was written in 1948?

Again you are just playing semantics as soon you won't have bad law or word games to hide behind as it is an incontrovertible biologocal fact that unborn babies are just as much human persons as the unborn and soon that fact will be codified into law in the vast majority of states, but whether or not it is codified doesn't change the fact that their people and killing them is murder.
Click to expand...

What a bunch of idiotic nonsense from you. What federal law was specifically written to deny personhood to the unborn? Are you saying the Constitution protects the right to abortion since it grants citizenship to all persons born in the US? That argument would seem to imply that Alito got it all wrong.

Let's see who is playing semantics. Provide us with the specific law "specifically written to protect the "right" of abortion by denying personhood status to the unborn."
 
Flash said:
His explanation was that "But none of these decisions (Griswold, Lawrence, Loving) involved what is distinctive about abortion: its effect on what Roe termed "potential life."
Click to expand...

Birth control most definitely is not distinctive from abortion in this context.


Certainly the constitutional guarantee of "life, liberty, and property without due process of law" gives a higher priority to life than it does consensual sex, interracial marriage, or birth control.
Click to expand...

LIFE...not "potential life".


I favor the freedom of a person to get an abortion, but that doesn't make Roe good constitutional law just because we like the results.
Click to expand...

Roe wasn't Constitutional Law.

It was a decision that was based on Constitutional Law.

Roe was never a law that was passed by Congress.


To suggest the Constitution splits the right to get an abortion into trimesters is certainly more imagination on the part of the justices than any constitutional principle.
Click to expand...

Exactly, which is why even the Roe decision was flawed. But just because it was flawed in that way doesn't mean it should be overruled just because of 5 or 6 justices personal beliefs.

Also, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barret all perjured themselves during their confirmation hearings when they all said Roe was settled.
 
FreeSpeech1789 said:
No it doesn't it says he is a biological male suffering from the mental delusion of gender dysphoria and enablers like you are only affirming his delusions.
Click to expand...

No, it's a chemical configuration in the brain, it's got nothing to do with a "mental delusion".

The mental delusion are those who think gender is binary, which is what you retreat to when confronted with new information.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top