How desperate the soulsick left is to murder the unborn....
Kavanaugh and Barret are liars!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Plus Gorsuch and Ailito fall under that claim, in fact, if you want a real exercise in flat out lying go back and watch Ailito’s confirmation hearings
Correct. So does that mean he won't vote to overturn it?
Althea
Althea told me...
The OP? I thought he is a lawyer?
Now, I'm talking about breakdown lane. He came here posing as a Medical Doctor. He is not.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Perhaps this will help answer your confusion .https://www.virginialawreview.org/articles/settled-law/
What confusion? Is Kaverynaughty going to vote to overturn it? Yes or no?
ExpressLane
Verified User
You came here posing as a moron . You have not failed to live up to that description.
Do you know what 2,3 Diphosphoglyceric Acid (2,3 Dpg) does in the human body? Waits while Confart furiously googles 2,3 Dpg and pretends he knows ExpressLane
Verified User
Tell me what settled law means
Means it is done per precedent and stare decisis.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
nobody will ever make that mistake with you.....
ExpressLane
Verified User
No it does not. It wasn't even use until the Bork hearings.
LOL, our idiot Fake Doc strikes again. Something is either settled law or it isn't. If it's settled, SCOTUS will respect it. Well, except in this instance.
cawacko
Well-known member
From same guy who wrote the previous one. I asked if precedent and establish law are the same thing. A little inflammatory but are you buying what he's saying here?
No. It's all the same; "precedent" is just a case that is still good law ie has not yet been overturned. Every Supreme Court precedent has to be followed by every lower court and no Supreme Court precedent is binding on the Supreme Court, although they will give past opinions different levels of deference based on a variety of factors (and the draft opinion goes through this laboriously). The folks acting like Kavanaugh and Trump's other appointees "lied" because they said Roe and Casey are "precedents" or "settled law" or whatever are either ignorant or being purposely misleading. Generally if you hear something like "established law" you can just assume the person is a gasbag. Ask the folks who say that every opinion ever authored by RBG or Sotomayor, no matter how recent, is "settled law" whether they also think DC v. Heller or Citizen United v. FEC is "settled law" immune to reconsideration. You'll likely end up with a bunch of stammering and a change of subject.
Not quite the "arguement" that Brett, and especially Alito, used in their hearings (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tru...s-previously-roes-precedent/story?id=84470384), Barret did, but the others lied, Gorsuch tipped toe around da direct answer as most nominees do with controversial questions.
Point being regardless of what they said, none of these individual ever held any regard for precedent, if they do, it is only if it meets their purpose, as I said earlier, guarantee eliminating Roe v Wade was mandatory for the Federalist Society to recommend them to Trump.
Althea
Althea told me...
Oh. I don't read most of his stuff. Another doctor? Darth used to claim to be a retired OR worker. Never went as far as to pretend to be a doctor.
gemini104104
Verified User
The product of the seditious and unqualified stench that tRump and his repuke co-conspires against Democracy, society and U.S. Constitutional law corrupted the court and rendered it incompetent. This until the seditious stench of tRump and his repuke co-conspires are removed at being a terrible threat against society and its wellbeing, and no worse of a threat compared to foreign enemies.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
ExpressLane
Verified User
Geeko Sportivo posted a selfie
Wonder what happened to old Darth. Given his age and his position on Covid...... well, you get the drift.