FreeSpeech1789
Banned
Prove that it's murder.
Murder is defined as the intentional killing of a human being, how does abortion not meet that definition? Does a 9 month old remain subhuman until it passes through a woman's vagina?
Prove that it's murder.
I like watching him squirm as well, which is why I continue to interact with him, especially on this issue. He becomes very irrational very quickly.I like seeing him ineffectively trying to get himself out of a losing hole.Never try to argue Human development with a doctor.
You do not have the right to murder an unborn child even in "private."
26 weeks.
Like ones that raped Roe?Rapists do.
There is no such thing as an unborn child.
How is it a whataboutism? You used a lower receiver as a retarded example in your feeble attempt to prove a point.
Not according to biology. What is the cut off point? Does a 9 month old remain subhuman until it passes through a woman's vagina? Ladies and gentlemen the party of science.
U already stated it was human
So a 9 month old remains subhuman until it passes through a woman's vagina?
Rapists do.
Rapists do.
You need only ask him two questions to completely tear his position apart.
[1] What is the species of the zygote if it is not 'human'? (here, he must admit that the zygote is human).
[2] How is the zygote actively developing through the stages of human life if he/she is not living? (here, he must admit that the zygote is living).
From here, he has now admitted that the zygote is a 'living human', and is thus condoning the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime nor have expressed any desire to die. --- IOW, a very morally disgusting, reckless, and indefensible position on human life.
He will then, in his irrationality, try to divert your focus off of this fact any way that he can, which usually means continuing to bring up and get you to start discussing the word "BEING", attempting to get you to fall into the rabbit hole of debating what a human "BEING" is, losing sight of the fact that he is condoning the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime nor have expressed any desire to die.
So long as you stick steadfast to this line of argumentation and refuse to fall for any distraction attempts, you have the winning position on the issue.
Nope. No need. You condone the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime nor have expressed any desire to die. That's murder. That's morally irreprehensible.
Or via C-section, yes.
Correct. I do not dispute that.
And what % of abortions are the product of rape?
And what % of abortions are the product of rape?
Thank God he isn't Gov. of Virginia anymore...Indeed.
Virginia Gov. Just Called For Legalizing Murder Of Newborn ...
https://thefederalist.com › Latest
Jan 30, 2019 — Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam Just Called For Legalizing Murder Of Newborn Babies ... “The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother ...