Durham issues trial subpoenas to Clinton campaign and DNC

dukkha

Verified User
Special counsel John Durham issued trial subpoenas for members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee as he pushed his theory of a “joint venture” in the case against Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, who represented the Clinton campaign, and Rodney Joffe.

Clinton’s campaign, the DNC, the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and the Perkins Coie law firm are fighting Durham’s efforts to compel the submission of withheld documents, arguing their claims of attorney-client privilege should keep the records concealed. However, Durham is continuing his legal pressure as he insists those groups played a coordinated role in pushing false Trump-Russia collusion claims.

Fusion “was not primarily providing or supporting expertise relating to legal advice; instead, it appears that the investigative firm’s primary, if not sole, function was to generate opposition research materials that the firm then shared widely,” Durham said this month.

“Meeting to agree on the express goal of a joint venture is precisely what happened here, on more than one occasion,” the special counsel said early Saturday morning.
 
Sussmann’s attorneys said they learned Durham had issued the trial subpoenas Tuesday and that the special counsel is “requesting the testimony of witnesses regarding the assertion of attorney-client privilege in front of the jury.” The Clinton campaign and the DNC advised Sussmann they wanted to fight ”this plainly impermissible testimony,” Sussmann’s lawyers said.

“The Special Counsel this week took the astonishing and legally inappropriate step of subpoenaing witnesses for the express purpose of having them testify to the invocation of the attorney-client privilege in front of the jury,” Sussmann’s lawyers contended in a Friday filing.

Hillary for America also tried to intervene Tuesday, saying it was “asserting attorney-client privilege and work protection" related to Perkins and Fusion. The filing included declarations from Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta, Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook, and Elias.

“The Special Counsel continues to overreach: he seeks to admit evidence that the law squarely forbids, he seeks to prove unduly prejudicial allegations he has not charged, and he seeks to prove conduct that is utterly irrelevant to the one discrete crime he has charged,” Sussmann’s lawyers argued Friday night.

Durham also “seeks to prevent Mr. Sussmann from introducing relevant — indeed essential — exculpatory evidence in the form of testimony from his former client, Rodney Joffe,” Sussmann’s lawyers said Friday.

Durham pushed back Saturday.

The goal of the joint venture could not have been more clear: it was to gather and disseminate derogatory non-public information regarding the internet activities of a political candidate and his associates,” he wrote.

And that venture was far from collateral to the charged crime. Indeed, the above-described joint venture was the very project that led Tech Executive-1 to rely upon the defendant’s services; the very project that gave rise to the Russian Bank-1 allegations; the very project that prompted agents of the Clinton Campaign to meet with Tech Executive-1; and the very project that caused the defendant to meet with the FBI General Counsel and lie to him about the clients who were behind all of this work," Durham said.

Durham has declined to promise that Joffe won’t be indicted at some point in the future, but if Joffe is not granted immunity to testify at trial on Sussmann’s behalf, then the charges should be dismissed, the defense team argued.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...s-trial-subpoenas-to-clinton-campaign-and-dnc
 
Special counsel John Durham issued trial subpoenas for members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee as he pushed his theory of a “joint venture” in the case against Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, who represented the Clinton campaign, and Rodney Joffe.

Clinton’s campaign, the DNC, the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and the Perkins Coie law firm are fighting Durham’s efforts to compel the submission of withheld documents, arguing their claims of attorney-client privilege should keep the records concealed. However, Durham is continuing his legal pressure as he insists those groups played a coordinated role in pushing false Trump-Russia collusion claims.

Fusion “was not primarily providing or supporting expertise relating to legal advice; instead, it appears that the investigative firm’s primary, if not sole, function was to generate opposition research materials that the firm then shared widely,” Durham said this month.

“Meeting to agree on the express goal of a joint venture is precisely what happened here, on more than one occasion,” the special counsel said early Saturday morning.

Did you always hate our nation? What motivates your hatred of democracy?
 
Special counsel John Durham issued trial subpoenas for members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee as he pushed his theory of a “joint venture” in the case against Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, who represented the Clinton campaign, and Rodney Joffe.

Clinton’s campaign, the DNC, the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and the Perkins Coie law firm are fighting Durham’s efforts to compel the submission of withheld documents, arguing their claims of attorney-client privilege should keep the records concealed. However, Durham is continuing his legal pressure as he insists those groups played a coordinated role in pushing false Trump-Russia collusion claims.

Fusion “was not primarily providing or supporting expertise relating to legal advice; instead, it appears that the investigative firm’s primary, if not sole, function was to generate opposition research materials that the firm then shared widely,” Durham said this month.

“Meeting to agree on the express goal of a joint venture is precisely what happened here, on more than one occasion,” the special counsel said early Saturday morning.


00-promo-french-rev.jpg




No big deal; it's only TREASON, that's all.
 
Last edited:
00-promo-french-rev.jpg




No big deal; it's only TREASON, that's all.

Too rich.

Being sneaky about getting dirt on a political opponent is treason but staging an assault on the United States Capitol building where Congress is in session for the purpose of undoing the election of a President is all in good sport.
 
Too rich.

Being sneaky about getting dirt on a political opponent is treason but staging an assault on the United States Capitol building where Congress is in session for the purpose of undoing the election of a President is all in good sport.

Excuse me? Staging a seditious conspiracy , including a three year+ SPECIAL COUNSEL INVESTIGATION, BASED ON THE MANUFACTURED LIES OF HIS POLITICAL OPPOSITION, IN COLLUSION WITH A HOSTILE FOREIGN POWER, LYING TO A FISA COURT TO PERPETRATE ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE, ENTRAPMENT CONSPIRACIES, ETC., WITH THE EXPRESSED INTENT OF FIRST, ILLEGALLY UNDERMINING HIS CAMPAIGN, AND THEN ,TRYING TO END HIS PRESIDENCY...IS A BIT MORE THAN "OPPOSITION RESEARCH"...IT'S TREASON ,PLAIN AND SIMPLE.



FineSlimBushsqueaker-size_restricted.gif
 
Excuse me? Staging a seditious conspiracy , including a three year+ SPECIAL COUNSEL INVESTIGATION, BASED ON THE MANUFACTURED LIES OF HIS POLITICAL OPPOSITION, IN COLLUSION WITH A HOSTILE FOREIGN POWER. ,INCLUDING ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE, ENTRAPMENT CONSPIRACIES, ETC., WITH THE EXPRESSED INTENT OF FIRST, ILLEGALLY UNDERMINING HIS CAMPAIGN, AND THEN ,TRYING TO END HIS PRESIDENCY...IS A BIT MORE THAN "OPPOSITION RESEARACH"...IT'S TREASON ,PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

Exactly. But they will never admit it. Right up until the time the guilty get the nooses dropped around their necks that is........:cool: Again I say,....JUSTICE IS COMING.
 
Exactly. But they will never admit it. Right up until the time the guilty get the nooses dropped around their necks that is........:cool: Again I say,....JUSTICE IS COMING.

They need to be publicly hanged, for real.

There's some rope with Kerry's neck name on it.
 
Last edited:
When CROTUS gets put to the rope she will look like she's doing the old Charleston! :laugh:



CR ookedest O f T he U nited S tates
 
This is not about "treason" but rather the Hildabeast doing the same sort of dirty tricks and criminal bullshit Nixon was doing when he was president.
 
When found guilty, they'll likely not be hanged, but will get Federal time. 20 years would be about right.
 
When found guilty, they'll likely not be hanged, but will get Federal time. 20 years would be about right.

Thats fine. As long as we get to hang em as soon as they get out of the big house! :laugh: The country can make a day of celebration out of it. Like a national holiday. A paid day off where we can all go to a picnic and watch a good public hangin! That night we can have softball games and demolition derbies,........finish off with a bang and put on a big fireworks show! A great day to be an American!

 
This is not about "treason" but rather the Hildabeast doing the same sort of dirty tricks and criminal bullshit Nixon was doing when he was president.

No. NO ONE EVER did the shit they did to Trump...three+ years into his Presidency, in addition to the illegal spying on his campaign, and lying to FISA courts, buying Russian lies.....etc.etc....
 

No. NO ONE EVER did the shit they did to Trump...three+ years into his Presidency, in addition to the illegal spying on his campaign, and lying to FISA courts, buying Russian lies.....etc.etc....

Very true. They were terrified of him because IMO he had all the dirt on them.
 
When found guilty, they'll likely not be hanged, but will get Federal time. 20 years would be about right.

How much time do you think that Trump should get for inciting Jan6th riot????????????????????????????
 
Last edited:
Special counsel John Durham issued trial subpoenas for members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee as he pushed his theory of a “joint venture” in the case against Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, who represented the Clinton campaign, and Rodney Joffe.

Clinton’s campaign, the DNC, the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and the Perkins Coie law firm are fighting Durham’s efforts to compel the submission of withheld documents, arguing their claims of attorney-client privilege should keep the records concealed. However, Durham is continuing his legal pressure as he insists those groups played a coordinated role in pushing false Trump-Russia collusion claims.

Fusion “was not primarily providing or supporting expertise relating to legal advice; instead, it appears that the investigative firm’s primary, if not sole, function was to generate opposition research materials that the firm then shared widely,” Durham said this month.

“Meeting to agree on the express goal of a joint venture is precisely what happened here, on more than one occasion,” the special counsel said early Saturday morning.

Another sham investigation that will turn-up nothing.
 
Back
Top