If you thought Florida couldn’t get any wackier,

Taichiliberal said:
And with typical MAGA intellectual dishonesty and cowardice, you won't state in no uncertain terms the DeSantis WAS DEAD WRONG...THAT HE HAS NO PROOF OF WHAT HE SAYS.

Whom do you think you're fooling with this "investigation" bullshit? All you'll do is just link & post every CRT boogeyman screed there is. I mean, YOU are going to do better in producing proof that a sitting governor and his staff of Ivy leaguers and political seniors couldn't/can't? Puh-leeze!

THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON DeSantis, NOT ME, genius. His statement, his accountability to the public. If he can't put up, then he's a liar.
Period.
But you've made this attempt to justify him, so we'll all periodically check your progress. I'll wager you try to blow it all off in less than 2 weeks. Carry on.
Click to expand...

I posted proof. Whether DeSantis knew that at the time or not, there is proof that CRT based material was included in some of the textbooks. Here it is again

T. A. Gardner said:
Finally! The state of Florida started releasing some of the stuff they objected to that was related to CRT...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/e...pc=U531&cvid=4a8ff5a597b849a3b87abe1e3b2a2ae6

AAWsI3B.img


This one uses graphs that tell the student the implicit racial bias of various groups by age, while the one on the right shows the same thing by political viewpoint. It clearly makes older and conservative people out to be implicitly more racist.

AAWskfu.img


In this example, the same sort of thing is repeated. Both use something called the Implicit Association Test as their basis.

https://edib.harvard.edu/implicit-association-test-iat

You can take it here:

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html

AAWsFYQ.img


This one includes irrelevant social learning in it and is not CRT like the above two are.

AAWsuwx.img


Another social - emotional learning example banned by Florida law.

Well, that's a start. At least there was some CRT content in at least some of the textbooks rejected.
Click to expand...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I posted proof. Whether DeSantis knew that at the time or not, there is proof that CRT based material was included in some of the textbooks. Here it is again
Click to expand...

Those are high school level textbooks. Should they also ban teaching about the history of racism and slavery, Civil Rights Act, the Holocaust and MLK Jr.? How about the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn? And so on? After all that would be a part of the "CRT framework and principles".
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
And with typical MAGA intellectual dishonesty and cowardice, you won't state in no uncertain terms the DeSantis WAS DEAD WRONG...THAT HE HAS NO PROOF OF WHAT HE SAYS.

Whom do you think you're fooling with this "investigation" bullshit? All you'll do is just link & post every CRT boogeyman screed there is. I mean, YOU are going to do better in producing proof that a sitting governor and his staff of Ivy leaguers and political seniors couldn't/can't? Puh-leeze!

THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON DeSantis, NOT ME, genius. His statement, his accountability to the public. If he can't put up, then he's a liar.
Period.
But you've made this attempt to justify him, so we'll all periodically check your progress. I'll wager you try to blow it all off in less than 2 weeks. Carry on.
Click to expand...



I posted proof. Whether DeSantis knew that at the time or not, there is proof that CRT based material was included in some of the textbooks. Here it is again
Click to expand...

Text books or downloads from various sites used by some teachers in high school? Big difference, ya know. I've posted just one example. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ya-angelous-sexual-abuse-sex-work/7387752001/

And exactly what is the problem? I don't see any particular race, color or creed mentioned. Are you saying anything pertaining to current social problems you NOT be taught or referenced in high school? Hmm, I think the Bob Jones University covered that.
 
AProudLefty said:
Those are high school level textbooks. Should they also ban teaching about the history of racism and slavery, Civil Rights Act, the Holocaust and MLK Jr.? How about the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn? And so on? After all that would be a part of the "CRT framework and principles".
Click to expand...

Red herring argument. First, whether they are grade school or high school, what I presented doesn't teach history at all. It is in books teaching math. Why should blatantly racist material be used as the basis for math problems? Worse, why should those problems and material be presented in such a way as to politicize it? That is core CRT usage in a textbook.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Text books or downloads from various sites used by some teachers in high school? Big difference, ya know. I've posted just one example.

And exactly what is the problem? I don't see any particular race, color or creed mentioned. Are you saying anything pertaining to current social problems you NOT be taught or referenced in high school? Hmm, I think the Bob Jones University covered that.
Click to expand...

That has nothing to do with what I posted. How does presenting material from a quack Harvard test of bias and racism as the basis for learning about polynomials make sense? It is using a racist example that is clearly politicized to inject a degree of indoctrination into the lesson.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Red herring argument. First, whether they are grade school or high school, what I presented doesn't teach history at all. It is in books teaching math. Why should blatantly racist material be used as the basis for math problems? Worse, why should those problems and material be presented in such a way as to politicize it? That is core CRT usage in a textbook.
Click to expand...

I'll bite. How is it racist? How does it politicize it? BTW, those are images. No link to actual textbooks to review.

Basic statistics is a part of math. Also Civics.
 
AProudLefty said:
Statistics, probability, polls, poll questions, civics, social studies, literature and so many many many more can be a part of math. If they really object to the "CRT" part of them, they'd outright ban the rest of the subjects.
Click to expand...

The Alt-Right is dishonest; they habitually twist the truth and inject a lot of lies.

An example is how they are twisting the data from the Harvard Implicit Association Tests. Care to bet how many of them actually took one prior to me? I'm guessing a big fat ZERO. LOL

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html The Gender and career/family test.

Your responses suggested a slight automatic association for Male with Career and Female with Family.
gendercareerbreakdown.jpg
 
T. A. Gardner said:
That has nothing to do with what I posted. How does presenting material from a quack Harvard test of bias and racism as the basis for learning about polynomials make sense? It is using a racist example that is clearly politicized to inject a degree of indoctrination into the lesson.
Click to expand...

Please stop acting dumber than you are. A curriculum textbook is published and approved by the state for general distribution to the designated grade levels. Downloaded "educational tools" by choice of individual teachers is NOT the same thing, as I and a link pointed out.

I asked you a question as to your example and naturally you avoided answering it directly. Typical MAGA dodge. But your equally stubborn hero DeSantis finally coughed up his "examples". As suspected, it's not exactly how he generalized things:

Florida claims critical race theory is in math textbooks

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=59a4e7ae24fe4a7f951871f40d0a2471


And before you detour to more BS:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ldn%92t-get-any-wackier&p=5069114#post5069114
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top