Wrong. Education has more to do with the student's family background than the school they attend. That is, if a student comes from a home that values education, has more opportunities to learn outside of school like books and parents that are well educated, they do better than students that come from a broken home where television is the only media available. Sure, there are exceptions both ways there but that is the general case.
Then why nationally is there no correlation between funding and results in public education?
https://www.npri.org/commentary/ana...n-education-spending-and-student-achievement/
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/public-spending-education-_b_1883387
https://www.americanexperiment.org/is-there-a-link-between-school-spending-student-achievement/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/realsp...to-improved-student-learning/?sh=3b1a40055135
They are when they are the only teachers. Few or no male role models for boys is an issue. I could toss in the inequity and unfairness of having a female dominated education system too. Don't Progressives like you rail against such inequities in gender when it goes the other way?
States may fund their education systems but they still have to follow state and federal regulations on things like workplace safety and environmental rules in handling chemicals. The easiest route for a school system to take to do that is to eliminate most or all programs that would involve such issues and avoid dealing with them entirely. That means fewer trade and learning opportunities for students involving these things. No more shop programs. No hands on chemistry experiments--or limiting them to ones that don't involve chemicals that could be hazardous.
The trick they use is to average all the numbers in instead of apply them by county, which is where the funding starts.
Example: https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/student-outcomes-does-more-money-really-matter/2019/06
“Saying money doesn’t matter is something that would be convenient if it were true,” said Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, a Northwestern University labor economist who found that states that overhaul their school finance systems see a significant positive impact on student-test scores.
And part of that improvement, she says, comes from tighter tracking and control of how money gets spent along the way.
“In the old days, money didn’t matter as much because schools weren’t held accountable for their outcomes,” said Schanzenbach. “Now that we have more accountability, the relationship between money and achievement has changed.”