Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson- AKA Bozo.

moon said:
maggot- are you saying that flying asylum-seekers to Africa is a vote winner for soon-to-be-deposed Bozo ?

Is the maltreatment of the desperate now an official Tory policy ?



Haw, haw..................................haw.
Click to expand...

I'm saying that I don't give a flying fuck for your opinion on the subject, or indeed any subject come to that.
 
I'll answer for you , maggot. Yes, maltreatment of desperate refugees is now the official policy of the UK's Tory party, which is led by a moral degenerate currently the subject of police investigations. So warped is the thinking of Bozo and his asshole accomplices that they believe cruelty is a vote-winner.
 
Countries which will defy international human rights and ship desperate refugees to concentration camps in Rwanda ......England, Denmark....and of course..................fucking Israel.



Haw, haw...................................haw.
 
Contemptible English behavior, maggot- and against the international convention on refugees.

Your criminal government just can't help itself, can it- except when it come to public funds.


Haw, haw..............................haw.
 
Gun Shaky
200w.webp
They were mostly just voting to keep Herr Corbyn out of power
Click to expand...


Why ' Herr Corbyn ' ? Have you been brain-scrubbed into believing that he's German- and so your weak mind can associate him with the Third Reich ?




Haw, haw......................................haw.


Fuck off
 
moon said:
Contemptible English behavior, maggot- and against the international convention on refugees.

Your criminal government just can't help itself, can it- except when it come to public funds.


Haw, haw..............................haw.
Click to expand...

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1650297169395.jpg
    FB_IMG_1650297169395.jpg
    80 KB · Views: 11
Imagine how the arch-bishop's condemnations have rocked the Tory grass-roots, maggot.
And then they see their leadership- and the likes of you- lampooning the church .

Tch, tch.

Ta, ta, Bozo, innit.


Haw, haw..................................haw.
 
moon said:
Gun Shaky



Why ' Herr Corbyn ' ? Have you been brain-scrubbed into believing that he's German- and so your weak mind can associate him with the Third Reich ?




Haw, haw......................................haw.


Fuck off
Click to expand...

Does he have to be a Kraut to be worthless?
 
Back to work today, after your Christian vacation, maggot ?

knife.jpg




Haw, haw...................................haw.
 
Legion said:
GettyImages-1239974769.jpg


A PRITI PICTURE​


Boris Johnson’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is “canny on several fronts”, says Clare Foges in The Times.

Not only is it a distraction from the PM’s Partygate fine, it has “roused the Tories’ usual culture war enemies to rage”. Jeremy Corbyn calls it “beyond cruel”, Caroline Lucas “vicious and grotesque”, Nicola Sturgeon “despicable”.

The Archbishop of Canterbury also weighed in, calling the scheme “ungodly”.

But what the critics “curiously” ignore is that those attempting to cross the Channel could choose to stay in France.

They may be fleeing a country of “haughty Parisians and terrible pop music”, but it’s hardly a war zone.

And the critics’ tacit acceptance of the status quo means we’re subcontracting our asylum policy to people smugglers.

The scheme doesn’t exactly make you want to “wrap yourself in the Union flag and start singing Jerusalem”.

It’s unlikely to work and will trigger endless rows with lawyers and human rights organisations.

There are in fact only two effective solutions to the migrant problem: turn back the boats, or clamp down on Britain’s black economy with a national ID card system.

In the meantime, though, Johnson will have “earned credit” with a core vote which clamors for hard line policies, while also not being able to enact a policy that he – “instinctively softer on immigration” – probably doesn’t like much anyway.

However much the left hate it, “for Johnson this policy is a win-win-win”.


https://link.newsletters.theknowledge.com/view/6256227209142080950a120dgbkx3.4fc/474c404d
Click to expand...

So what about Denmark?
 
Primavera said:
So what about Denmark?
Click to expand...

Denmark has spent 20 years deterring migrants.

While Britain’s plan to process asylum seekers in Rwanda has provoked bemusement in much of Europe, it has been welcomed by Denmark, which appears poised to conclude a similar deal.

Since 2015, when more than a million asylum seekers from Syria and elsewhere arrived in Europe, successive Danish governments of both right and left have introduced, or at least threatened to introduce, headline-grabbing measures to dissuade migrants by making the wealthy and otherwise liberal Scandinavian country seem as unwelcoming as possible.

Mette Frederiksen, 44, the Social Democratic prime minister, has said her aim is to reduce the number of people seeking asylum in her country to zero.

One law, passed in 2016, stipulated that newly arrived asylum seekers should hand over jewelry, gold and other valuables.



https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hardline-denmark-has-spent-20-years-deterring-migrants-flfjs5rxr
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top