People who live with a gun present face twice the risk of death by homicide

They knew that stats would prove the proliferation of guns results in many, many , many deaths. They result in mass murders. A kid playing with a gun lover's weapon kills another kid every day. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/interactive/2022/kids-shot-killed-2021-gun-violence-record/

Kids playing with matches burn down homes every day.
Kids swiping the car keys and wrecking the car (and possibly someone else's) happen quite often.
Kids swallow poison every day.

False authority fallacy. The Washington Post is a newspaper, not a statistic. It is biased.

Watch your kids and raise them properly.
Yes...that includes teaching them about guns.

We have always had guns in our house and no one ever committed suicide.
 
I don't understand the stigma that goes with suicide.
Shouldn't people be entitled to decide when they've had enough?

When the rewards don't adequately compensate the travails, life becomes a net-negative experience.
Sometimes people just get sick of it.
How is that hard to understand?
Not when they are children.
Idiot.
Children have no judgement, no discretion, no bank of knowledge, no way to know that they will not always be in such pain.
You have outlived your usefulness.
Please take your own advice and off your self.
I suggest a small handgun to minimize clean up.
 
Bombs are against the law and we do everything we can to stop them. Guns kill multiples of those killed by bombs. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/02/03/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/
From your link, over half were suicides, nothing to do with guns. Most suicides I know about were hangings, ODs, one drank furniture polish.


Here is a lot of info on the phenomenon https://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/story?id=4476181

Further, it is generally reported that Police kill almost three times the number in your article.
 
Shut the fuck up you fucking idiot. That is precisely their function you functional retard.

Nope. No dictionary owns any word. No dictionary defines any word. That is not their purpose. The purpose of a dictionary is to standardize spelling and pronunciation, and to provide samples on the use of a word. No dictionary defines any word.
 
The biggest mass murders in this country involved bombs.

Bombs are also legal weapons.

The 2nd amendment does not specify any limit of any Arm by type, caliber, action, whether it's "scary looking", whether the military uses it.

ANY weapon is allowed, including any bomb. Any law that seeks to infringe ownership or use of these weapons for defense is itself unconstitutional. Yes...States are bound by the 2nd amendment just as the federal government is.


Murdering people is not legal, no matter what the weapon.
 
Nope. No dictionary owns any word. No dictionary defines any word. That is not their purpose. The purpose of a dictionary is to standardize spelling and pronunciation, and to provide samples on the use of a word. No dictionary defines any word.
Stupidity fallacy; you are a moron.
 
Bombs are also legal weapons.

The 2nd amendment does not specify any limit of any Arm by type, caliber, action, whether it's "scary looking", whether the military uses it.

ANY weapon is allowed, including any bomb. Any law that seeks to infringe ownership or use of these weapons for defense is itself unconstitutional. Yes...States are bound by the 2nd amendment just as the federal government is.


Murdering people is not legal, no matter what the weapon.
Thank you Captain Obvious.

Now shut the fuck up you evil moron.
 
Bombs are against the law and we do everything we can to stop them. Guns kill multiples of those killed by bombs. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/02/03/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/

Bombs are not against the law. They are legal to own and use. Indeed, I myself make some for entertainment purposes.
No gun is against the law.

The 2nd amendment does not specify 'Arm' by type, brand, action, style, accessory, etc. ANY type of weapon.
 
Back
Top