Fl voter laws tossed by judge

[cancel2 2022]

You need your shit sausage filled head examined by a team of the worlds foremost doctors in the field of mental abnormalities. Do us ALL a favor. Make the damn call! 1-800-IMC-RAZY

Actually I really think she is mentally impaired, she been like that for well over 15 years at least.

 

[Matt Dillon]

And well within his right to do so under the law as a US District Court judge.

His ruling will be struck down like lightning. He went way out of bounds on that.

 

[Matt Dillon]

So all the MAGA minions have to do is provide the legal statutes where it says that a U.S. District Court judge cannot make such rulings for states under his jurisdiction. When they can do that, THEN they have a basis beyond sour grapes for debate. Until then, it'll be up to the higher court and/or SCOTUS to make that decision.

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/tenth_amendment

The state elected to do something, and some Federal judge is trying to do something else that is wholly unconstitutional.

No power was delegated to "The United States" whom he represents, (by the Constitution) to do what he did.

The End. That judge should be impeached for going against the very fabric of why he's there.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

WHAT A FUCKING LIAR. THAT IS NOT THE WORDING OF ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTIION, THIS IS:


Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.



THERE IS NO BULLSHIT :"BUT THE CONGRESS..." REGARDING ELECTION LAWS.

YOU QUOTED A SINCE OVERTURNED COURT CASE , AND PRETENDED IT'S IN THE CONSTITUTION.

WHAT AN IGNORAMUS FUCKHEAD YOU ARE.


YOU/'RE FUCKING PATHETIC, AND A PROVEN LIAR...AGAIN.



AND THE FUCKHEAD JUDGE WILL GET HIS ASS HEANDED TO HIM ,ON APPEAL.

The legislature can't direct a manner and then after the manner they chose doesn't give them the desired results then they can redirect the manner. That violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Do I need to explain amendments to you?

By the way, the judge said this which clearly defeats your idiotic argument.
4I

Federal courts would not countenance a law denying Christians their sacred right to prayer,
and they should not countenance a law denying Floridians their sacred right to vote.
At the outset, this Court notes that the parties have vastly different views on
how this Court should approach this case. To hear Plaintiffs tell it, Florida wears a
constitutional straitjacket any time it revises its election code. To hear Defendants
tell it, Florida holds a constitutional blank check. Neither is true.
States enjoy considerable discretion in regulating their elections. Article I of
the Constitution tasks states with enacting laws governing “[t]he Times, Places and
Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives.” U.S. Const. art. I,
§ 4, cl. 1. But the states’ discretion is not limitless. The states must comply with acts
of Congress, such as the VRA. See id. (“ut the Congress may at any time by Law
make or alter such Regulations.”). They must also comply with the Constitution. For
example, election regulations cannot “deny to any person . . . the equal protection of
the laws.” U.S. Const. amend. XIV. And states cannot deny the right to vote based
on race, sex, or failure to pay a tax. U.S. Const. amend. XV, § 1; U.S. Const. amend.
XIX; U.S. Const. amend. XXIV. Nor, for citizens older than 18, can states deny the
right to vote based on age. U.S. Const. amend. XXVI.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

seems you don't even know where to look to find the "facts" the judge ruled on.......

It seems you want to argue that the judge did something that the judge didn't do.

Let's look at your original statement -

okay bright boy.....explain how a law that says all drop boxes have to be indoors is an impediment for black voters but not white voters......

Now let's look at the judge's ruling on moving drop boxes indoors.

This Court is not empowered to speculate as to
whether the diversion of resources these parties suffer will be redressed by an

injunction against the drop box provision. As such, no Plaintiff has established
standing, under any theory, to challenge the provision

The judge didn't rule that moving the drop boxes indoors was an impediment to black voters. The judge said no one had standing to challenge that particular provision.

So clearly you don't have a clue as to what the judge ruled let alone what evidence the judge used.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...election-/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS




A federal judge on Thursday struck down portions of Florida’s new election law, siding with liberal groups opposed to the restrictions on drop boxes for mail-in ballots and third-party voter registration.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker declared most of the law unconstitutional. He wrote that voting rights in the U.S. are “under siege” because of racial gerrymandering of congressional districts.

What excellent news. Is third-party registration when a group like League of Women Voters has a registration drive, like on a college campus, and helps ppl sign up? If so, what's wrong with that? I mean, other than the more ppl vote the less the Republiqans tend to do poorly.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/tenth_amendment

The state elected to do something, and some Federal judge is trying to do something else that is wholly unconstitutional.

No power was delegated to "The United States" whom he represents, (by the Constitution) to do what he did.

The End. That judge should be impeached for going against the very fabric of why he's there.

One small little problem with your argument. The Constitution does delegate to Congress the power to create laws on how elections are conducted.

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

Congress did pass a law. The Voting Rights Act. Federal courts are the jurisdiction for all violations of federal law. Clearly the court does have jurisdiction and anyone capable of reading at a 6th grade level or above should recognize that.

 

[Grokmaster]

The legislature can't direct a manner and then after the manner they chose doesn't give them the desired results then they can redirect the manner. That violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Do I need to explain amendments to you?

By the way, the judge said this which clearly defeats your idiotic argument.
4I

SHUT UP YOPU FUCKING IDIOT.

NO "JUDGE" CAN CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION. THE STATE LEGISLATURES WRITE ELECTION LAWS.

PERIOD. IF A JUDGE THINKS IT'S AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, HE CAN SPECIFY HOW.


THE RULING OF THE MORON OBAMA JUDGE IN FLORIDA WIL NEVER STAND, AS IT IS BULLSJHIT.


YOUR RIDICULOLUS LIE ABIOUT WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAYS HAS ALREADY BEEN EXPOSED.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

SHUT UP YOPU FUCKING IDIOT.

NO "JUDGE" CAN CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION. THE STATE LEGISLATURES WRITE ELECTION LAWS.

PERIOD. IF A JUDGE THINKS IT'S AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, HE CAN SPECIFY HOW.


THE RULING OF THE MORON OBAMA JUDGE IN FLORIDA WIL NEVER STAND, AS IT IS BULLSJHIT.


YOUR RIDICULOLUS LIE ABIOUT WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAYS HAS ALREADY BEEN EXPOSED.

^^^ One day you'll blow a gasket and end up a vegetable staring at the ceiling. LOL ^^^

 

[PostmodernProphet]

It seems you want to argue that the judge did something that the judge didn't do. .

obviously, he reversed what the legislature set forth as rules for elections.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

The judge said no one had standing to challenge that particular provision.

and yet he enjoined the enforcement of that statute, saying it was racist.........go figure.....

 

[Dutch Uncle]

and yet he enjoined the enforcement of that statute, saying it was racist.........go figure.....

Since you're a racist and a hater, you must have been pleased.

 

[anatta]

judge is gonna get over-ruled..case closed

 

[PostmodernProphet]

; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations,

you keep saying that......but the fact is, in this case Congress didn't.......a judge did.......you may have noticed the Constitution doesn't mention him......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Since you're a racist and a hater, you must have been pleased.

since you're a mindless fool, you must still be trying to figure out which way is up......

 

[Dutch Uncle]

since you're a mindless fool, you must still be trying to figure out which way is up......

Actually, I'm pretty good at knowing which way is up. The fact you seem oblivious to what being a Christian is all about is sad.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

and yet he enjoined the enforcement of that statute, saying it was racist.........go figure.....

Do you not know the meaning of the term "severability?"

 

[AProudLefty]

federal judges fuck up all the time.......that's we have appeal courts.....in this particular case I know federal law better than the federal judge......

 

[evince]

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...election-/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS




A federal judge on Thursday struck down portions of Florida’s new election law, siding with liberal groups opposed to the restrictions on drop boxes for mail-in ballots and third-party voter registration.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker declared most of the law unconstitutional. He wrote that voting rights in the U.S. are “under siege” because of racial gerrymandering of congressional districts.

This is what will happen to all these evil laws


Roberts owes this nation an apology for taking the Republican Party off that decades old court ordered consent decree

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

you keep saying that......but the fact is, in this case Congress didn't.......a judge did.......you may have noticed the Constitution doesn't mention him......

Congress passed the Voter Rights Act. The judge ruled the Florida law violated the Federal law that Congress passed.

The judge also pointed out that if states can pass laws the violate the right to vote as established in the Constitution then states can pass laws violating any rights in the Constitution so they could ban guns or outlaw religions. I guess you didn't realize that the right to vote was in the US Constitution. It is the one right that is named more than once.