CIA Releases Documents Fmr. Vice President Cheney Requested Be Made Public

I am sure you knew that Charver was being sarcastic. Thats why you answered with "When did that ever happen in the Yadkin Valley?".

I was not being sarcastic when I said that some people just don't get it. And I was not being sarcastic when I said I was an astute observer.
You must be smarting from the zing because you're mixed up. Posts 118 and 120 were sarcastic, Post 121, as you just admitted, was not. *shrug*
 
You must be smarting from the zing because you're mixed up. Posts 118 and 120 were sarcastic, Post 121, as you just admitted, was not. *shrug*

Oh, I was talking aboutthe sarcasm you completely didn't get. Just to have the fun of showing you the error of your ways.

Your zing was meaningless.

121 was certainly not sarcastic. why should it be? I am an astute observer and some people don't get it. If you don't understand what I meant when I said "some people don't get it", then you might be one of those who don't get it.

Get it?
 
and I think the question of severe mental suffering is a bit subjective.....as I said earlier, I suspect most liberals experience it when they are told they are idiots.....
and I would suggest that if YOU were stripped naked after being captured by one of America's enemies... a hood put over your head, and electrodes attached to YOUR hands... that YOU might consider yourself in severe mental anquish... but we'll never know, because that would require you to show the sort of ethics to actually make such an admission.
 
and I would suggest that if YOU were stripped naked after being captured by one of America's enemies... a hood put over your head, and electrodes attached to YOUR hands... that YOU might consider yourself in severe mental anquish... but we'll never know, because that would require you to show the sort of ethics to actually make such an admission.

we know you wouldn't....that is just an average weekend night for you and your "wink" friends
 
and I would suggest that if YOU were stripped naked after being captured by one of America's enemies... a hood put over your head, and electrodes attached to YOUR hands... that YOU might consider yourself in severe mental anquish... but we'll never know, because that would require you to show the sort of ethics to actually make such an admission.

one thing's for certain, MM.....if liberals are left to run the country, I'll have a better chance at experiencing it.....
 
well, let's see...
1. I have said my definition of torture includes causing harm.
2. They killed him.
~ I think we can conclude that would fall within my definition of "torture"

I asked if making a man stand on a box with a bag over his head was torture....I didn't ask if killing a man was torture...(though I will note that chaining a man with his hands over his head isn't an act you would naturally assume would cause death)....

I will stand behind the fact that neither the photo of the man on the box or your photo of a corpse was in fact evidence of torture....

You can stand behind your opinion that neither was tortured but the facts tell a different story. Al-Jamadi died while being tortured and there's no doubt about it. Apparently you didn't read the article I linked.

As far as the photo of the man on the box, he was being tortured psychologically, and probably physically as well. If you don't think there's such a thing as psychological torture, try visiting a VA hospital and talking to vets who've suffered with PTSD for years.
 
You can stand behind your opinion that neither was tortured but the facts tell a different story. Al-Jamadi died while being tortured and there's no doubt about it. Apparently you didn't read the article I linked.

you didn't link the story when you used the picture, as usual, and I my comment was an accurate response to the picture......it provided no evidence of torture.....it was just a picture of a body (actually, I assumed the guy was dead, that information wasn't provided either)......
 
we know you wouldn't....that is just an average weekend night for you and your "wink" friends

you really need to get a life other than crusing gay bars, yurtie....

what do you have of substance? Isn't there some semantic argument you feel compelled to make?
 
you didn't link the story when you used the picture, as usual, and I my comment was an accurate response to the picture......it provided no evidence of torture.....it was just a picture of a body (actually, I assumed the guy was dead, that information wasn't provided either)......

You responded to my posts 90 and 101, but *curiously* overlooked #99, which gave a link and an excerpt and a comment.
 
Oh, I was talking aboutthe sarcasm you completely didn't get. Just to have the fun of showing you the error of your ways.

Your zing was meaningless.

121 was certainly not sarcastic. why should it be? I am an astute observer and some people don't get it. If you don't understand what I meant when I said "some people don't get it", then you might be one of those who don't get it.

Get it?
LOL Now you're making shit up. Be a man, and simply admit that you didn't get the joke. You're beginning to look more than simply stupid.
 
You responded to my posts 90 and 101, but *curiously* overlooked #99, which gave a link and an excerpt and a comment.

as I said, I made my comment regarding your picture as "evidence" of torture....what I said was true when I said it, it's still true now....I commented on your text by saying that killing someone would fall within my definition of "torture".....
 
I'm sure you do, every time you make shit up.

No, its because of the fact that you have been shown wrong numerous times and do your dance to avoid admitting it. Its because you love to post your Logical Fallacy stuff aimed at others, but then use the same things yourself.

Its like being told to "Man up" by Richard Simmons.
 
Back
Top