Affirmative Action Jackson is an extremist. This is now a problem for the Court

Legion

Oderint dum metuant
GettyImages-1387390693-1-640x480.jpg


SHE'S A BIG FAN OF WESLEY'S WORK



Wesley Hawkins, the left's hero of the Affirmative Action Jackson hearings, describes life after pornography sentence

Wesley Hawkins heard a few weeks ago that a Black woman had been nominated to the Supreme Court and wondered why her name sounded so familiar.

Then, he saw her picture and knew.

Affirmative Action Jackson was the judge who had given him a 90-day sentence him for felony possession of child pornography.

But in recent days, unbeknownst to him, Hawkins’s 2013 sentencing became topical.

This week Hawkins repeatedly crisscrossed a neighborhood in view of the U.S. Capitol in his hunt for young boys — unaware that inside, members of Congress were talking at length about him and his case in nationally televised hearings.

Tracked down by leftist media eager to put him on a pederastic pedestal, he was surprised to learn that to today's DEMOCRATS, he is a demi-god.

In an interview Thursday at a relative’s home in the District, Hawkins was in disbelief. “My case?” he asked a Washington Post reporter. “They’re talking about my case?” Soon, he was watching YouTube clips of he Senate instead of his usual kiddie porn, his mouth agape.

The left's latest hero was found with videos and images depicting prepubescent boys engaged in sex acts, and he is grateful to Affirmative Action Jackson for letting him out of jail so he could continue corn-holing kids.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/03/25/wesley-hawkins-ketanji-brown-jackson/
 
Prominent DEMOCRAT arrested for kiddie porn; vows to take case to the Supreme Court

eliot-culter-781.jpg


JAILED DEMOCRAT LOOKS TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION JACKSON FOR "JUSTICE"





Prominent DEMOCRAT political figure Eliot Cutler was arrested Friday on child pornography charges.

Cutler is facing four counts of possession of unlawful sexually explicit materials Class C, which means subjects are younger than 12-years-old, Matthew J. Foster, district attorney for Hancock and Washington counties, said.

The arrest comes days after police executed search warrants at his homes.

Foster said police first received a tip in December from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

A search of his devices this week resulted in at least 10 more files, according to Foster.

Cutler worked in the Office of Management and Budget under President Jimmy Carter.









https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/local/eliot-cutler-arrested-following-search-of-two-properties-prosecutor-says/97-c3ed2478-e8ab-4bb8-88af-f183904e3626
 
236760_5_.jpg


DUMB AS A ROCK



For crying out loud, it’s 2022 and, in the federal government women are still being promoted based on their looks rather than their qualifications for the job.

And by POTUS no less! Well, bungling Biden is just a derivative iteration of Harvey Weinstein.

Around twenty years ago, he twice participated in filibustering (Black, female) Judge Janice Rogers Brown’s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals. She finally was approved in 2005.

Then, bungling Biden advised President Bush that if he dared to nominate Brown to the Supreme Court, he would filibuster her again and prevail.

At the same time, DEMOCRATS also filibustered a Hispanic male judge, two other female judges, and a male judge of Lebanese descent, among others.

How very diverse, inclusive, and equitatious of them!

However, Affirmative Action Jackson does have several attributes in common with the bungling Biden"

For one, she’s got a lousy memory. Indeed, it was Senator Cruz’s careful and repetitious questioning, that helped her to recall quite a few things about herself that she had previously forgotten. Such a lack of self-awareness from one who anticipates setting precedent is disturbing.

She did independently recall “staring at the image on the cover" of Derrick Bell’s book Faces At The Bottom Of The Well "when I was growing up.” She must have been a very late bloomer.

That book was first published when she was a senior at Harvard.

Affirmative Action Jackson is no scholar. She’s a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Law, yet couldn’t recall the core arguments in the pivotal Dred Scott case.

How does she expect to converse intelligently with thoroughly prepared lawyers regarding precedent and relevance in cases that will appear before her in the Supreme Court?

She was unable to respond intelligently regarding the near-total recidivism rates of pedophiles and sexual offenders. She’s overseen many of these cases, yet is unfamiliar with the literature? Has she no curiosity regarding common subjects in her courtroom? Is she not driven to be the best possible judge she can be?

In common with Shamala, the Affirmative Action VP, she seems to have no familiarity, or, at least, no opinion on or understanding she was willing to state, with the visceral topics of our times.

What is a woman? When does life begin? Her flip answers cause this author to wonder how shallow is her thinking?

Her understanding of constitutional principles is weak.

And her language usage is sloppy and casual. Free speech is allowed? Allowed??? Free speech is. Period. It is Congress and, by extension the government, that is not allowed to interfere with the exercise of the unalienable right of citizens to freely speak and thus exercise the foundation of their liberty.

Affirmative Action Jackson has been overturned enough times now to confirm that both her judgment and constitutional expertise are lacking. She is out of step with the common federal judiciary understanding of the law and its bases, precedents, and exceptions. Again, she’s not paying attention.


https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/03/ketanji_brown_jackson_is_a_trojan_horse.html
 
Sassy!

Sen. Sasse says he won't support Affirmative Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court because 'we disagree on judicial philosophy'


https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/gop-sen-ben-sasse-says-142256309.html
 
GettyImages-1387390693-1-640x480.jpg


SHE'S A BIG FAN OF WESLEY'S WORK



Wesley Hawkins, the left's hero of the Affirmative Action Jackson hearings, describes life after pornography sentence

Wesley Hawkins heard a few weeks ago that a Black woman had been nominated to the Supreme Court and wondered why her name sounded so familiar.

Then, he saw her picture and knew.

Affirmative Action Jackson was the judge who had given him a 90-day sentence him for felony possession of child pornography.

But in recent days, unbeknownst to him, Hawkins’s 2013 sentencing became topical.

This week Hawkins repeatedly crisscrossed a neighborhood in view of the U.S. Capitol in his hunt for young boys — unaware that inside, members of Congress were talking at length about him and his case in nationally televised hearings.

Tracked down by leftist media eager to put him on a pederastic pedestal, he was surprised to learn that to today's DEMOCRATS, he is a demi-god.

In an interview Thursday at a relative’s home in the District, Hawkins was in disbelief. “My case?” he asked a Washington Post reporter. “They’re talking about my case?” Soon, he was watching YouTube clips of he Senate instead of his usual kiddie porn, his mouth agape.

The left's latest hero was found with videos and images depicting prepubescent boys engaged in sex acts, and he is grateful to Affirmative Action Jackson for letting him out of jail so he could continue corn-holing kids.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/03/25/wesley-hawkins-ketanji-brown-jackson/

you are so fucking stupid you confuse looking at sick ass pics, which is bad enough, with your fantasy and part time hobby- cornholing kids. when you are not doping goats so you can blow them.
 

josh hawley is a hypocritical creampuff lying pussyboy. he has voted for federal judges who have similar records on child porn possession.

New York Times: “Critics of Jackson’s Child Sex Abuse Sentences Backed Judges With Similar Records”

New York Times: “Several Republican senators repeatedly and misleadingly suggested during this week’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings that Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson had given uncommonly lenient sentences to felons convicted of child sex abuse crimes. But all of the Republican critics had previously voted to confirm judges who had given out prison terms below prosecutor recommendations, the very bar they accused Judge Jackson of failing to clear.”

New York Times: “But Mr. Hawley, Mr. Graham, Mr. Cotton and Mr. Cruz all voted to confirm judges nominated by President Donald J. Trump to appeals courts even though those nominees had given out sentences lighter than prosecutor recommendations in cases involving images of child sex abuse.”

So we’ll say this again for good measure: Judge Jackson’s sentencing record is firmly within the mainstream for federal judges – including judges appointed by Donald Trump – and these baseless attacks have been conclusively debunked:

ABC News: “An ABC News review of federal judges appointed and confirmed during the Trump administration found nearly a dozen had handed down below-guideline sentences in cases of defendants viewing, possessing, transporting or distributing child pornography.”

PolitiFact: “Hawley, and Cruz, emphasized how much shorter Jackson’s sentences were than what prosecutors sought. She appears to have company, including among judges elevated to federal appeals courts during the Trump administration.”

For instance, Judge Amul Thapar, who had once been on Trump's list for the Supreme Court, is also a favorite of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, and now sits on the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals.

When he served as a district court judge in the Eastern District of Kentucky, he sentenced a defendant for production of child pornography in United States v. Sherman to 360 months -- 30 years -- when his guidelines were life and the government recommended 1,080 months -- 90 years. A review of the transcript shows Thapar struggling with the case, taking into consideration various factors including the futures of the defendant's children.

In her testimony, Jackson spoke about all the factors she considered when handing down sentences. Hawley read extensively from court transcripts depicting the factors that Jackson considered.
In the end, Thapar concluded that while 100 years would be a deterrent he was not convinced that these "healthy sentences" aren't accomplishing "as much deterrence as we want."
For his confirmation to an appeals court, Thapar received the support of Republican members who still sit on the Senate Judiciary panel, including Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Graham, John Cornyn of Texas, Mike Lee of Utah, Cruz, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Tom Cotton of Arkansas, John Kennedy of Louisiana and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.
Another judge, Joseph Bianco, when he was serving on the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sentenced one defendant for distribution of child pornography to 60 months when his guidelines were 151 to 188 months and the government had asked for more.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/25/politics/white-house-ketanji-brown-jackson-hearing/index.html
 
So you say.

So, what is she doing being nominated to the highest court in the land? She wasn’t President Obama’s selectee when he had the chance to make history. But perhaps he didn’t want to seem race-obsessed.

Oh, sorry, who am I kidding?

Affirmative Action Jackson is a Trojan horse, set to spill out all the weaponry of the progressives into our court of final appeal should she be approved. Affirmative Action Jackson is dogmatic and anti-rational.

Affirmative Action Jackson views everything through the lenses of power structure and victimhood.

Affirmative Action Jackson's work on behalf of the very worst terrorists in the entire human population and her expressed sympathies with the most horrible destroyers of human dignity (pedophiles) already prove this.

Affirmative Action Jackson will not regard the law as founded in an objective, defined reality but will push for a fluidity of definition, subject to prevailing arguments.

With Affirmative Action Jackson, the Constitution, law, customs, tradition, and precedent lose all meaning. See her past deliberate setting aside of sentencing guidelines to know how Affirmative Action Jackson will continue.

Affirmative Action Jackson will not be a seeker of the truth. Her obfuscations, voids, and outright falsehoods given before Congress attest to this. And what’s with the head-scratching? It’s a tell, alright. I wouldn’t mind playing poker opposite her.

Besides the perennially contentious gun and abortion wars, we’ve got others rumbling toward SCOTUS. To name but a few:
  • Gender inequity claims based on another’s deviance from chromosomal reality a la the Williams swimmer.
  • Detransitioning lawsuits against medical establishments and practitioners for affirming, rather than impartially addressing, mental health and other medical claims made by adolescents.
  • The role the state may play in the lives of children, via school, social work, and childcare, vs parental rights.
  • Governmental action that results in loss of livelihood, business opportunity, and prosperity coming from COVID lockdowns, economic mandates like shutting down pipeline construction, and the failure to stop the burning of cities by looters and rioters.
  • Defining “peaceably to assemble” to prosecute proper criminals and determine the government’s liability for having hunted down and incarcerated unjustifiably truly peaceful protesters.
  • Covert actions by the alphabet agencies domestically against citizens.
  • Collectivism via emergency declarations versus individual rights and states’ rights as enumerated in the Constitution.
Affirmative Action Jackson will be poised to poison the arguments and written decisions of one of the most powerful small groups on earth.

Do not be deluded, cowed, humiliated, or threatened into approving her nomination now, just because she was previously approved for a federal judgeship. She’s had a chance to prove herself in such a position. Given that chance, though, she failed and, perhaps under another administration, would be subject to censure or impeachment. Good sense, courage, and strength demand a Nay vote on her appointment.

Affirmative Action Jackson is intellectually lazy and careless. She’s a thoroughly committed leftist Progressive. She’s the last type of judge we need on the Supreme Court.

we all know a pinhead like you did not write that bullshit. you are too stupid to write anything at a 4th grade level, and this is at least 6th grade. so i searched the internet and lo and behold, you plagiarized it like a little bitch. this was an opinion piece, not facts, so when you copied it and posted it, you wanted people to think you wrote it. because you are a gutless, chickenshit liar. the only thing you wrote was the silly ass "Affirmative Action Jackson" about 20 times like a retard.

here is where you stole that bullshit-

Judge Jackson is a Trojan horse, set to spill out all the weaponry of the progressives into our court of final appeal should she be approved. She will be dogmatic and anti-rational. She will view everything through the lenses of power structure and victimhood. Her work on behalf of the very worst terrorists in the entire human population and her expressed sympathies with the most horrible destroyers of human dignity (pedophiles) already predict this.

She will not regard the law as founded in an objective, defined reality but will push for a fluidity of definition, subject to prevailing arguments. With her, the Constitution, law, customs, tradition, and precedent will lose all meaning. See her past deliberate setting aside of sentencing guidelines to know how she will continue.

Judge Jackson will not be a seeker of the truth. Her obfuscations, voids, and outright falsehoods given before Congress attest to this. And what’s with the head-scratching? It’s a tell alright. I wouldn’t mind playing poker opposite her.

Besides the perennially contentious gun and abortion wars, we’ve got others rumbling toward SCOTUS. To name but a few:

Gender inequity claims based on another’s deviance from chromosomal reality a la the Williams swimmer.
Detransitioning lawsuits against medical establishments and practitioners for affirming, rather than impartially addressing, mental health and other medical claims made by adolescents.
The role the state may play in the lives of children, via school, social work, and childcare, vs parental rights.
Governmental action that results in loss of livelihood, business opportunity, and prosperity coming from COVID lockdowns, economic mandates like shutting down pipeline construction, and the failure to stop the burning of cities by looters and rioters.
Defining “peaceably to assemble” to prosecute proper criminals and determine the government’s liability for having hunted down and incarcerated unjustifiably truly peaceful protestors.
Covert actions by the alphabet agencies domestically against citizens.
Collectivism via emergency declarations versus individual rights and states’ rights as enumerated in the Constitution.
Some of these may not arise under Biden but you can bet your sweet bippy they will under the next president. Judge Brown Jackson, if approved, will be poised to poison the arguments and written decisions of one of the most powerful small groups on earth.

Senators, do not be deluded, cowed, humiliated, or threatened into approving her nomination now, just because she was previously approved for a federal judgeship. She’s had a chance to prove herself in such a position. Given that chance, though, she failed and, perhaps under another administration, would be subject to censure or impeachment. Good sense, courage, and strength demand a Nay vote on her appointment.

Brown Jackson is intellectually lazy and careless. She’s a thoroughly committed leftist Progressive. She’s the last type of judge we need on the Supreme Court.

March 25, 2022
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a Trojan Horse
By Anony Mee

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/03/ketanji_brown_jackson_is_a_trojan_horse.html
 
GettyImages-1387390693-1-640x480.jpg


SHE'S A BIG FAN OF WESLEY'S WORK



Wesley Hawkins, the left's hero of the Affirmative Action Jackson hearings, describes life after pornography sentence

Wesley Hawkins heard a few weeks ago that a Black woman had been nominated to the Supreme Court and wondered why her name sounded so familiar.

Then, he saw her picture and knew.

Affirmative Action Jackson was the judge who had given him a 90-day sentence him for felony possession of child pornography.

But in recent days, unbeknownst to him, Hawkins’s 2013 sentencing became topical.

This week Hawkins repeatedly crisscrossed a neighborhood in view of the U.S. Capitol in his hunt for young boys — unaware that inside, members of Congress were talking at length about him and his case in nationally televised hearings.

Tracked down by leftist media eager to put him on a pederastic pedestal, he was surprised to learn that to today's DEMOCRATS, he is a demi-god.

In an interview Thursday at a relative’s home in the District, Hawkins was in disbelief. “My case?” he asked a Washington Post reporter. “They’re talking about my case?” Soon, he was watching YouTube clips of he Senate instead of his usual kiddie porn, his mouth agape.

The left's latest hero was found with videos and images depicting prepubescent boys engaged in sex acts, and he is grateful to Affirmative Action Jackson for letting him out of jail so he could continue corn-holing kids.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/03/25/wesley-hawkins-ketanji-brown-jackson/

The above post is notable for its libel of the young man who was 18 and just out of high school when sentenced to jail - the suggestion he was cruising for young boys is the wishful fantasy of the poster, and also for wrongly suggesting the story supports the poster's animus for the Judge. Rubbish as usual, in other words.
 
The above post is notable for its libel of the young man who was 18 and just out of high school when sentenced to jail - the suggestion he was cruising for young boys is the wishful fantasy of the poster, and also for wrongly suggesting the story supports the poster's animus for the Judge. Rubbish from him as usual, in other words.

Please, do elaborate.
 
Back
Top