Republicans Falsely Accuse Biden’s Supreme Court Pick Of Going Easy On Sex Offenders

Dutch Uncle said:
Just like Trump's association with pedophiles!

5mt8nn.jpg
Click to expand...

you spelled biden wrong
 
ExpressLane said:
Biden likes it when judges go easy on pedophiles.
Click to expand...

Not President Biden, but one term loser Trump and his buddy Matt Getz. Dont forget his Friend Epstein who preyed on 16 year old girls employed by Trump to be "towel girls" in the men's locker room at Mar-A-Lago.
 
Jarod said:
Not President Biden, but one term loser Trump and his buddy Matt Getz. Dont forget his Friend Epstein who preyed on 16 year old girls employed by Trump to be "towel girls" in the men's locker room at Mar-A-Lago.
Click to expand...

The entire Republican Party supports pedos like Trump, Gaetz, Roy Moore, etc.

5t7olk.jpg
 
Jarod said:
Not President Biden, but one term loser Trump and his buddy Matt Getz. Dont forget his Friend Epstein who preyed on 16 year old girls employed by Trump to be "towel girls" in the men's locker room at Mar-A-Lago.
Click to expand...

Trump and Epstein were never friends, however Epstein and the Clinton's were thick as thieves
 
Wolverine said:
So now a simple picture means friends:laugh: it was a photo op for Epstein! Step up your game old man!
Click to expand...

Sane, honest people know there are dozens of photos of Trump and his pedo friends. Trump was raping Epstein's girls throughout the 90s.

51v5hs.gif
 
PoliTalker said:
The sentencing guidelines for child porn were out of whack. She was giving sentences which were totally in line with what other judges were doing.

"But in terms of her own work, I mean, I fully expect that she will talk about the child pornography sentences. And I think she will have Romney to give the context. Now, these senators have 30 minutes for — each senator has 30 minutes for questioning. So she should be given the time to explain what was happening with sentencing and child pornography that led to more lenient sentences, as most other federal judges were doing, because, at the time, those sentences were perceived as too tough and a mess.

And the Sentencing Commission was struggling at the time with trying to work all that out. So, she was not out of the mainstream."

PBS Newshour
Click to expand...
theres no butt
stop giving this nonsense legs

bottom line white men have convinced
white americans that blacks are child molesters so it fits the narrativethat because shes black she will let black men out of jail.
 
TTQ64 said:
theres no butt
stop giving this nonsense legs

bottom line white men have convinced
white americans that blacks are child molesters so it fits the narrativethat because shes black she will let black men out of jail.
Click to expand...

Who mentioned the race of the men convicted, oh yeah, you did! I couldn't tell you the race of any of those people I listed, racist!
 
gemini104104 said:
Sewer dwelling gutter trolls should consider the following details versus their lies and bullshit against a fully qualified SCOTUS Justice candidate who is far more qualified than what tRump and his seditious repukes dumped on SCOTUS in violation of U.S. Constitutional law:

Republicans Falsely Accuse Biden’s Supreme Court Pick Of Going Easy On Sex Offenders
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record on cases involving sex offenses is backed by research well within the mainstream.

In a thinly sourced Twitter thread on Thursday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) made a series of inflammatory attacks against Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is President Joe Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court and currently a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

The tweets dealt with some of Jackson’s past statements on sex offender registries and civil commitment, as well as her views on mandatory minimums. He claimed, without evidence, that Jackson “has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker.”

It was a preview of a tactic Republicans will likely deploy next week when Jackson testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which Hawley is a member. But despite his claim that she is soft on sex offenses, nothing is particularly unusual about her judgments in such cases.

“I’m concerned that this is a record that endangers our children,” Hawley tweeted Thursday, in a thread that contained out-of-context screenshots of Jackson’s past statements and no links to the underlying material he was criticizing."

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/repu...kson-supreme-court_n_6234b708e4b019fd812d8aab
Click to expand...

Giving someone a 3 month sentence for child sex abuse instead of 10 years that the Federal guidelines called for...is going easy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top