Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
So you have no citation, that means it’s a lie.
gib•ber•ish (ˈdʒɪb ər ɪʃ, ˈgɪb-)
n.
1. meaningless or unintelligible talk or writing; nonsense.
2. talk or writing containing many obscure, pretentious, or technical words.
flail (flāl)
n.
To wave or swing vigorously; thrash: flailed my arms to get their attention.
To move vigorously or erratically; thrash about: arms flailing helplessly in the water.
To strike or lash out violently
half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person
moron
noun
mo·ron | \ ˈmȯr-ˌän \
1: a foolish or stupid person
mental case
noun
: a crazy person
That guy is a complete mental case.
Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story
They are the supposed nonpartisan group of top spies looking out for the best interest of the nation.
But the 51 former “intelligence” officials who cast doubt on The Post’s Hunter Biden laptop stories in a public letter really were just desperate to get Joe Biden elected president. And more than a year later, even after their Deep State sabotage has been shown again and again to be a lie, they refuse to own up to how they undermined an election.
The officials, including CNN pundit and professional fabricator James Clapper — a man who was nearly charged for perjury for lying to Congress — signed a letter saying that the laptop “has the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/intel...to-apologize-for-smearing-hunter-biden-story/
They are the supposed nonpartisan group of top spies looking out for the best interest of the nation.
But the 51 former “intelligence” officials who cast doubt on The Post’s Hunter Biden laptop stories in a public letter really were just desperate to get Joe Biden elected president. And more than a year later, even after their Deep State sabotage has been shown again and again to be a lie, they refuse to own up to how they undermined an election.
The officials, including CNN pundit and professional fabricator James Clapper — a man who was nearly charged for perjury for lying to Congress — signed a letter saying that the laptop “has the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/intel...to-apologize-for-smearing-hunter-biden-story/
Do the officials who tried to flip the 2020 election feel any regret for their actions? The Post reached out to those who signed the letter. Most would not answer the question. A few doubled-down, including Clapper. No remorse. No shame. And no apologies:
Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t respond.
Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State University: Declined comment.
John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.
Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.
John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.
Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University: Didn’t respond.
Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.
Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.
Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism: Didn’t respond.
John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group:
Didn’t respond.
Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel: Didn’t respond.
David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”
Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t respond.
Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.
David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t respond.
Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t respond.
Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t respond.
David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t respond.
Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer: Didn’t respond.
Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t respond.
Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.
Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t respond.
Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”
Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.
John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer: Declined to comment.
Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs:
Didn’t respond.
Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues: Didn’t respond.
Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director: Didn’t respond.
David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.
Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”
Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t be reached.
Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t respond.
Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State University: Declined comment.
John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.
Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.
John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.
Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University: Didn’t respond.
Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.
Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.
Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism: Didn’t respond.
John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group:
Didn’t respond.
Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel: Didn’t respond.
David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”
Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t respond.
Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.
David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t respond.
Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t respond.
Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t respond.
David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t respond.
Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer: Didn’t respond.
Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t respond.
Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.
Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t respond.
Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”
Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.
John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer: Declined to comment.
Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs:
Didn’t respond.
Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues: Didn’t respond.
Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director: Didn’t respond.
David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.
Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”
Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t be reached.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
what a stupid fuck bitch you are!! you quote the NY Post? same assholes who own fox? and you expect anyone to believe you. just because the laptop is real, does not mean the russians might have changed or created content on the computer and made sure it was "discovered" by some pawn shop owner. and why is hunter biden important? he was never connected to the government, to the biden campaign. unlike sleazy ivanka trump and her gay husband jared.
About 446,000 results (0.46 seconds)
Ivanka's Trademark Requests Were Fast-Tracked In China ...https://www.forbes.com › tommybeer › 2020/09/22 › i...
Sep 22, 2020 — The Chinese government granted a total of 41 trademarks to companies linked to Ivanka Trump by April of 2019—and the trademarks she applied ...
Works written: The Trump Card
China grants 18 trademarks in 2 months to Trump, daughterhttps://apnews.com › ...
Nov 7, 2018 — SHANGHAI (AP) — The Chinese government granted 18 trademarks to companies linked to President Donald Trump and his daughter Ivanka Trump ...
Ivanka Trump Wins China Trademarks, Then Her Father Vows ...https://www.nytimes.com › 2018/05/28 › business › ivank...
May 28, 2018 — Trump's trademarks, according to data from China's trademark office. Then, on May 21, China awarded Ms. Trump two more trademarks in snacks, ...
Ivanka Trump gets initial approval from China for 16 trademarkshttps://www.cnbc.com › 2018/11/06 › ivanka-trump-ge...
Nov 6, 2018 — The approval for Ivanka Trump's trademarks comes three months after she said her personal clothing brand was shutting down. It occurred “while ...
Ivanka Trump's Chinese Trademarks - CREW - Citizens for ...https://www.citizensforethics.org › crew-investigations
Nov 5, 2018 — Presidential adviser Ivanka Trump's fashion brand won first trial approval for 16 new trademarks from the Chinese government in October.
China greenlights large batch of Ivanka Trump trademark ...https://www.washingtonpost.com › world › 2018/11/06
Nov 6, 2018 — In May, China awarded Ivanka Trump seven trademarks around the same time that President Trump worked to save a Chinese state-owned telecom ...
Now let's look at the moronic responses from those who did respond to the NY Posts question:
Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”
Let me translate this bullshit for you: Clapper is still a liar and going to lie about anything he bloviates on CNN or MSNBC.
Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do — Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to be prudent.”
Translation: Even though I signed on to a lie, it helped get rid of Trump.
Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”
Translation: I'll continue to lie.
Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”
Translation: I'm still going to lie my dumb, partisan ass off about the whole affair and anything else related to Biden. BUT TRUMP!!!!
Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”
Translation: The Sgt Schultz defense, "I see NUTTING!!"
So these are all the hacks that signed that lie filled pile of bullshit used by the media to bury the REAL truth and story about Biden and his son's despicable corruption and lying.
Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”
Let me translate this bullshit for you: Clapper is still a liar and going to lie about anything he bloviates on CNN or MSNBC.
Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do — Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to be prudent.”
Translation: Even though I signed on to a lie, it helped get rid of Trump.
Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”
Translation: I'll continue to lie.
Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”
Translation: I'm still going to lie my dumb, partisan ass off about the whole affair and anything else related to Biden. BUT TRUMP!!!!
Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”
Translation: The Sgt Schultz defense, "I see NUTTING!!"
So these are all the hacks that signed that lie filled pile of bullshit used by the media to bury the REAL truth and story about Biden and his son's despicable corruption and lying.
Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.
whining
adjective
whin·ing | \ ˈ(h)wī-niŋ \
1: producing or emitting a prolonged, high-pitched sound : producing a whine
a whining howl
2: complaining or =inclined to complain in a childish or petulant manner
[/i]child·ish (chīl′dĭsh)
adj.
Marked by or indicating a lack of maturity; puerile: immature; infantile: Screaming and stamping your feet is childish.[/i]
half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
ooh, hunter biden's laptop!! when he had nothing at all to do with the government of biden's campaign. but let's blow off ivanka trump's connection to china, and the quid pro quo, when SHE WAS A TOP ADVISOR TO HER CHICKENSHIT DADDY.
About 446,000 results (0.46 seconds)
Ivanka's Trademark Requests Were Fast-Tracked In China ...https://www.forbes.com › tommybeer › 2020/09/22 › i...
Sep 22, 2020 — The Chinese government granted a total of 41 trademarks to companies linked to Ivanka Trump by April of 2019—and the trademarks she applied ...
Works written: The Trump Card
China grants 18 trademarks in 2 months to Trump, daughterhttps://apnews.com › ...
Nov 7, 2018 — SHANGHAI (AP) — The Chinese government granted 18 trademarks to companies linked to President Donald Trump and his daughter Ivanka Trump ...
Ivanka Trump Wins China Trademarks, Then Her Father Vows ...https://www.nytimes.com › 2018/05/28 › business › ivank...
May 28, 2018 — Trump's trademarks, according to data from China's trademark office. Then, on May 21, China awarded Ms. Trump two more trademarks in snacks, ...
Ivanka Trump gets initial approval from China for 16 trademarkshttps://www.cnbc.com › 2018/11/06 › ivanka-trump-ge...
Nov 6, 2018 — The approval for Ivanka Trump's trademarks comes three months after she said her personal clothing brand was shutting down. It occurred “while ...
Ivanka Trump's Chinese Trademarks - CREW - Citizens for ...https://www.citizensforethics.org › crew-investigations
Nov 5, 2018 — Presidential adviser Ivanka Trump's fashion brand won first trial approval for 16 new trademarks from the Chinese government in October.
China greenlights large batch of Ivanka Trump trademark ...https://www.washingtonpost.com › world › 2018/11/06
Nov 6, 2018 — In May, China awarded Ivanka Trump seven trademarks around the same time that President Trump worked to save a Chinese state-owned telecom ...
About 446,000 results (0.46 seconds)
Ivanka's Trademark Requests Were Fast-Tracked In China ...https://www.forbes.com › tommybeer › 2020/09/22 › i...
Sep 22, 2020 — The Chinese government granted a total of 41 trademarks to companies linked to Ivanka Trump by April of 2019—and the trademarks she applied ...
Works written: The Trump Card
China grants 18 trademarks in 2 months to Trump, daughterhttps://apnews.com › ...
Nov 7, 2018 — SHANGHAI (AP) — The Chinese government granted 18 trademarks to companies linked to President Donald Trump and his daughter Ivanka Trump ...
Ivanka Trump Wins China Trademarks, Then Her Father Vows ...https://www.nytimes.com › 2018/05/28 › business › ivank...
May 28, 2018 — Trump's trademarks, according to data from China's trademark office. Then, on May 21, China awarded Ms. Trump two more trademarks in snacks, ...
Ivanka Trump gets initial approval from China for 16 trademarkshttps://www.cnbc.com › 2018/11/06 › ivanka-trump-ge...
Nov 6, 2018 — The approval for Ivanka Trump's trademarks comes three months after she said her personal clothing brand was shutting down. It occurred “while ...
Ivanka Trump's Chinese Trademarks - CREW - Citizens for ...https://www.citizensforethics.org › crew-investigations
Nov 5, 2018 — Presidential adviser Ivanka Trump's fashion brand won first trial approval for 16 new trademarks from the Chinese government in October.
China greenlights large batch of Ivanka Trump trademark ...https://www.washingtonpost.com › world › 2018/11/06
Nov 6, 2018 — In May, China awarded Ivanka Trump seven trademarks around the same time that President Trump worked to save a Chinese state-owned telecom ...
How Dem officials, the media and Big Tech worked in concert to bury the Hunter Biden story
Everlasting, undying, soul-rending shame be upon you, Facebook and Twitter and Politico and all the others who covered up, denied and suppressed this newspaper’s true and accurate reporting about Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020. You should be hurling yourselves at the feet of the American people, begging forgiveness. You should be renting billboards saying, “WE LIED.”
But most importantly, you should be hauled before Congress to answer humiliating questions.
These and other information purveyors owe us — not just this paper, but this country — restitution for what now looks like the most egregious and willful fake-news scam of our time. This paper’s scoops on Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020 were labeled “Russian misinformation” (Politico), a “hoax” (Steven Brill of “fact-check” site NewsGuard), discredited by “many, many red flags” (NPR) and a “hack and leak” operation that had to be throttled (Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg)
It was infamously snuffed out on Twitter, as was The Post’s Twitter account, because of a policy about hacked materials that only seemed to apply to this one case.
https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/how-big-tech-media-and-dems-killed-the-hunter-biden-story/
Everlasting, undying, soul-rending shame be upon you, Facebook and Twitter and Politico and all the others who covered up, denied and suppressed this newspaper’s true and accurate reporting about Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020. You should be hurling yourselves at the feet of the American people, begging forgiveness. You should be renting billboards saying, “WE LIED.”
But most importantly, you should be hauled before Congress to answer humiliating questions.
These and other information purveyors owe us — not just this paper, but this country — restitution for what now looks like the most egregious and willful fake-news scam of our time. This paper’s scoops on Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020 were labeled “Russian misinformation” (Politico), a “hoax” (Steven Brill of “fact-check” site NewsGuard), discredited by “many, many red flags” (NPR) and a “hack and leak” operation that had to be throttled (Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg)
It was infamously snuffed out on Twitter, as was The Post’s Twitter account, because of a policy about hacked materials that only seemed to apply to this one case.
https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/how-big-tech-media-and-dems-killed-the-hunter-biden-story/
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.
whining
adjective
whin·ing | \ ˈ(h)wī-niŋ \
1: producing or emitting a prolonged, high-pitched sound : producing a whine
a whining howl
2: complaining or =inclined to complain in a childish or petulant manner
[/i]child·ish (chīl′dĭsh)
adj.
Marked by or indicating a lack of maturity; puerile: immature; infantile: Screaming and stamping your feet is childish.[/i]
half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person
WOW, you can quote a dictionary!! you must be the brightest kid in your special ed second grade class. but calling you a low grade moron is not projection, it is describing how fucking stupid you are. see the difference?
This is what a crack addict and narcissist looks like:
BidenPresident
Verified User
Hilarious. You cite another newspaper to prove something about NY Times.