No more nukes

BartenderElite

Verified User
The ol' rally cry from the '70's - it applies more than ever today.

The world needs a practical path forward for universal nuclear disarmament. This situation cannot happen again, and it's not in the interest of the future survival of the species to allow it to.
 
pink-fluffy-unicorn-dancing-on-a-rainbow.gif


Maybe you could organize some TikTok dancers to make it happen.

The White House Is Using TikTok Influencers

https://www.newsweek.com/white-house-using-tiktok-influencers-peddle-propaganda-opinion-1688698

Bungling Biden has a list.





BTW, don't you support voluntary human extinction "to save the planet"?


https://www.vhemt.org/
 
Destroying all nukes would be great for the world. They cost a fortune to maintain. Accidents have happened. There are 6 nukes that are lost. There have been 32 incidents involving them that were very dangerous. We dropped nukes on North Carolina and Spain. We are generally more careful than other nuclear countries and we fucked up. They should be destroyed.
 
Destroying all nukes would be great for the world. They cost a fortune to maintain. Accidents have happened. There are 6 nukes that are lost. There have been 32 incidents involving them that were very dangerous. We dropped nukes on North Carolina and Spain. We are generally more careful than other nuclear countries and we fucked up. They should be destroyed.

Give it your best shot.
 
Nukes are keeping the good countries of the world from doing more to protect the Ukraine.

The Hypersonic Missile deployed by Russia means every Capitol on Earth has ZERO PROTECTION from attack. You could eliminate every Nuke on the Planet, but the one with the Hypersonic Missiles will destroy everyone else.
 
The ol' rally cry from the '70's - it applies more than ever today.

The world needs a practical path forward for universal nuclear disarmament. This situation cannot happen again, and it's not in the interest of the future survival of the species to allow it to.

Trouble is, there is no practical path.
 
Destroying all nukes would be great for the world. They cost a fortune to maintain. Accidents have happened. There are 6 nukes that are lost. There have been 32 incidents involving them that were very dangerous. We dropped nukes on North Carolina and Spain. We are generally more careful than other nuclear countries and we fucked up. They should be destroyed.

No nuclear bombs were dropped on Spain or North Carolina.
 
I’ve heard it argued that what’s happening in Ukraine, a country that gave up its nukes, is why no country will give up their nukes in the future.

I’m no foreign policy guru but no nukes seems like some pie in the sky kumbaya type wish. How would it even work? Everyone goes to the UN and pinky swears they will get rid of them, and if someone like Putin doesn’t then we are going to put a bunch of sanctions on him? That’s just not reality.
 
I’ve heard it argued that what’s happening in Ukraine, a country that gave up its nukes, is why no country will give up their nukes in the future.

I’m no foreign policy guru but no nukes seems like some pie in the sky kumbaya type wish. How would it even work? Everyone goes to the UN and pinky swears they will get rid of them, and if someone like Putin doesn’t then we are going to put a bunch of sanctions on him? That’s just not reality.

There are legit global organizations working toward that goal. I've only started looking at the strategy, but they do account for these kinds of considerations.

Obviously, it has to be more than a promise. There has to be a mechanism for inspections, and a means of enforcement. But with a global economy, it's something that can become an integral part of participating in the world community.

It's doesn't have to be some dreamy thing. It's not in the world's interest to allow the possibility of one rogue leader ending the species.
 
It is not Nukes that are the problem. It is the partisan hacks that never think about them when they blindly vote for a politician.
 
The Hypersonic Missile deployed by Russia means every Capitol on Earth has ZERO PROTECTION from attack. You could eliminate every Nuke on the Planet, but the one with the Hypersonic Missiles will destroy everyone else.

Hopefully they'll start with you.
 
Climate scientist Michael Mills describes the devastation of a nuclear detonation




Bryan Dyne: What would happen to a city in a nuclear exchange between the US and North Korea? [ This interview was conducted in mid-April 2017, when the Trump administration was ratcheting up tensions with North Korea ]

Michael Mills: Our work is based on the idea that if a nuclear bomb exploded over a large modern city, the explosion would cause fires that would ignite over the entire area, eventually becoming what is known as a firestorm. This means that the fires have become so hot that the city itself becomes fuel for the fire, which releases much more energy than the nuclear weapon itself. This is what happened during the incendiary bombings of Hamburg, Dresden and Tokyo and the atomic bombing of Hiroshima during World War II.

Essentially, if a city is ignited on this scale, the fires produce millions of tons of black smoke, also called soot, from the burning buildings and other materials. Heat from the fires causes the soot-filled air to rise, and the soot absorbs sunlight, further heating the air so that it rises into the stratosphere, 10 to 30 miles above Earth’s surface. These particles are so high that they don’t get rained out, since there is no weather in the stratosphere. So it can take decades for the soot to settle back down to the surface.

The main effect from all this soot being trapped in the stratosphere is that it continuously absorbs sunlight. In our models, which are based off of the detonation of 100 small nuclear weapons by India and Pakistan, global temperatures become the coldest they’ve been in the past 1,000 years. In a big exchange between major powers, you basically get ice age temperatures.

The second problem is that heating up the stratosphere destroys up to 50 percent the ozone layer by producing changes in the chemical reaction rates that produce ozone. While this happens today in Antarctica, that is a seasonal effect that occurs in the Antarctic spring and early summer. The loss of ozone from stratospheric heating is constant and worldwide. As a result, crops and ecosystems face not only freezing temperatures, but also intense ultraviolet light from the Sun as a result of a diminished ozone layer.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/20...9VHs8e35L1K3ArYD-WLxMCsTZb4tgLRS2raDsdyp096MA
 
Back
Top