Here are 4 ways Biden can avoid an energy collapse

First, the administration should mitigate the headwinds it has already embedded in future production by holding lease sales as soon as possible. To do so, the administration must stop invoking excuses for evading its duty to conduct such sales.

Interior recently announced that the one onshore lease sale in the planning process is now indefinitely on hold due to a recent court decision barring the administration from using its interim estimates for the social cost of greenhouse gas emissions. This particular cost analysis, however, is not required for lease sales, so the administration can and should proceed with previously used cost estimates.

With respect to offshore leasing, Interior should promptly complete the next five-year leasing program, which is required by law, as expeditiously as possible. In addition to the already unprecedented gap of more than one year since the last successful lease sale under the current program, we are also on track for at least a second year without offshore leasing. There is no excuse for the administration’s protracted delay in issuing the next iteration of the offshore leasing program.

Second, the administration should work with all relevant agencies to ensure that infrastructure permitting processes are designed and implemented in a manner that ensures consistency, transparency and timeliness – supporting both federal production and much larger production on state and private lands. (Another benefit to the administration is that this would aid renewable energy infrastructure, too.)

Third, the administration should reinstate the leases it suspended in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the permit development it approved in the National Petroleum Reserve. These were permitted with stringent environmental standards and could prove to be a significant source of domestic production over time.

Fourth, if the administration wants to see domestic energy projects and production continue, it should end its efforts to deny capital to oil and gas producers. American energy leadership requires a fair and welcoming investment environment.

Without the above policy changes, the unfortunate result will be a steady decline in oil and gas production over the next several years – and a reliance on unsteady regimes. Europe knows how that movie ends.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/energy/biden-energy-gas-prices-oil-frank-macchiarola
 
All oil is bought and sold on the same global oil market, so nothing we do here domestically is going to have anything more than a nominal and temporary impact on the price per barrel because OPEC controls 80% of the world's global oil reserves, and can -at any time- increase production to bankrupt US oil companies, just as it did in 2015.
 
First, the administration should mitigate the headwinds it has already embedded in future production by holding lease sales as soon as possible. To do so, the administration must stop invoking excuses for evading its duty to conduct such sales.

Interior recently announced that the one onshore lease sale in the planning process is now indefinitely on hold due to a recent court decision barring the administration from using its interim estimates for the social cost of greenhouse gas emissions. This particular cost analysis, however, is not required for lease sales, so the administration can and should proceed with previously used cost estimates.

With respect to offshore leasing, Interior should promptly complete the next five-year leasing program, which is required by law, as expeditiously as possible. In addition to the already unprecedented gap of more than one year since the last successful lease sale under the current program, we are also on track for at least a second year without offshore leasing. There is no excuse for the administration’s protracted delay in issuing the next iteration of the offshore leasing program.

Second, the administration should work with all relevant agencies to ensure that infrastructure permitting processes are designed and implemented in a manner that ensures consistency, transparency and timeliness – supporting both federal production and much larger production on state and private lands. (Another benefit to the administration is that this would aid renewable energy infrastructure, too.)

Third, the administration should reinstate the leases it suspended in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the permit development it approved in the National Petroleum Reserve. These were permitted with stringent environmental standards and could prove to be a significant source of domestic production over time.

Fourth, if the administration wants to see domestic energy projects and production continue, it should end its efforts to deny capital to oil and gas producers. American energy leadership requires a fair and welcoming investment environment.

Without the above policy changes, the unfortunate result will be a steady decline in oil and gas production over the next several years – and a reliance on unsteady regimes. Europe knows how that movie ends.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/energy/biden-energy-gas-prices-oil-frank-macchiarola

What a fucking idiot.

Not one single oil company is going to start a new well because doing so will lower the price per barrel and make it unprofitable.

It is simply NOT in the oil company's interests to start new wells because that reduces their profits.
 
First, the administration should mitigate the headwinds it has already embedded in future production by holding lease sales as soon as possible. To do so, the administration must stop invoking excuses for evading its duty to conduct such sales.

Interior recently announced that the one onshore lease sale in the planning process is now indefinitely on hold due to a recent court decision barring the administration from using its interim estimates for the social cost of greenhouse gas emissions. This particular cost analysis, however, is not required for lease sales, so the administration can and should proceed with previously used cost estimates.

With respect to offshore leasing, Interior should promptly complete the next five-year leasing program, which is required by law, as expeditiously as possible. In addition to the already unprecedented gap of more than one year since the last successful lease sale under the current program, we are also on track for at least a second year without offshore leasing. There is no excuse for the administration’s protracted delay in issuing the next iteration of the offshore leasing program.

Second, the administration should work with all relevant agencies to ensure that infrastructure permitting processes are designed and implemented in a manner that ensures consistency, transparency and timeliness – supporting both federal production and much larger production on state and private lands. (Another benefit to the administration is that this would aid renewable energy infrastructure, too.)

Third, the administration should reinstate the leases it suspended in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the permit development it approved in the National Petroleum Reserve. These were permitted with stringent environmental standards and could prove to be a significant source of domestic production over time.

Fourth, if the administration wants to see domestic energy projects and production continue, it should end its efforts to deny capital to oil and gas producers. American energy leadership requires a fair and welcoming investment environment.

Without the above policy changes, the unfortunate result will be a steady decline in oil and gas production over the next several years – and a reliance on unsteady regimes. Europe knows how that movie ends.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/energy/biden-energy-gas-prices-oil-frank-macchiarola

Every single thing you copied and pasted from Fox News is wrong.

All of it.

Oil prices are set on the global market, and OPEC controls that market, not us.

If you want us to be "energy independent", then you must support nationalizing the oil industry because they are going to sell the oil to whoever is willing to pay the most for it.
 
All oil is bought and sold on the same global oil market, so nothing we do here domestically is going to have anything more than a nominal and temporary impact on the price per barrel because OPEC controls 80% of the world's global oil reserves, and can -at any time- increase production to bankrupt US oil companies, just as it did in 2015.

All what oil? A lot of oil from the States is no longer on the market.
 
What a fucking idiot.

Not one single oil company is going to start a new well because doing so will lower the price per barrel and make it unprofitable.

It is simply NOT in the oil company's interests to start new wells because that reduces their profits.

You can't sell oil you don't have, dumbass.
 
Every single thing you copied and pasted from Fox News is wrong.

All of it.

Oil prices are set on the global market, and OPEC controls that market, not us.

If you want us to be "energy independent", then you must support nationalizing the oil industry because they are going to sell the oil to whoever is willing to pay the most for it.

OPEC does not control the oil market.
 
First, the administration should mitigate the headwinds it has already embedded in future production by holding lease sales as soon as possible. To do so, the administration must stop invoking excuses for evading its duty to conduct such sales.

Interior recently announced that the one onshore lease sale in the planning process is now indefinitely on hold due to a recent court decision barring the administration from using its interim estimates for the social cost of greenhouse gas emissions. This particular cost analysis, however, is not required for lease sales, so the administration can and should proceed with previously used cost estimates.

With respect to offshore leasing, Interior should promptly complete the next five-year leasing program, which is required by law, as expeditiously as possible. In addition to the already unprecedented gap of more than one year since the last successful lease sale under the current program, we are also on track for at least a second year without offshore leasing. There is no excuse for the administration’s protracted delay in issuing the next iteration of the offshore leasing program.

Second, the administration should work with all relevant agencies to ensure that infrastructure permitting processes are designed and implemented in a manner that ensures consistency, transparency and timeliness – supporting both federal production and much larger production on state and private lands. (Another benefit to the administration is that this would aid renewable energy infrastructure, too.)

Third, the administration should reinstate the leases it suspended in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the permit development it approved in the National Petroleum Reserve. These were permitted with stringent environmental standards and could prove to be a significant source of domestic production over time.

Fourth, if the administration wants to see domestic energy projects and production continue, it should end its efforts to deny capital to oil and gas producers. American energy leadership requires a fair and welcoming investment environment.

Without the above policy changes, the unfortunate result will be a steady decline in oil and gas production over the next several years – and a reliance on unsteady regimes. Europe knows how that movie ends.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/energy/biden-energy-gas-prices-oil-frank-macchiarola

How stupid that was. Biden allowed more for oil leases. They take time to develop. They will do nothing for this problem. Oil companies have a glut of oile leases that they are not developing. They are just using this Putin war as an excuse to pile up more of them, which they also will not use.
 
Back
Top