ExpressLane
Verified User
I wonder if flow batteries might be useful.I'd agree w/ that. Conservatives kind of knee-jerk oppose anything green, but there are sensible measures that can be taken to accelerate R&D without making blind commitments.
I wonder if flow batteries might be useful.I'd agree w/ that. Conservatives kind of knee-jerk oppose anything green, but there are sensible measures that can be taken to accelerate R&D without making blind commitments.
Why Tom's article is a fail whale. Selecting just two alternative sources could certainly fail, but why would we avoid hydro-electric, solar thermal, geo-thermal bio-fuel and new clean nuclear?
Also the insane pronouncement that the entire country is both dark and totally calm at the same time is nuts.
There is stuff down the line that people in the field haven't even imagined yet.
That's like saying we shouldn't invest in computers in the 1970's, and referencing Chinese bean counters from thousands of years ago.
It is ironic that the same morons who think that man can change the planets climate also think that ancient solar and wind technology can power a modern society. Perhaps they want to return to cave man days where life expectancies were around 30 years of age?
We barely make any investment in green right now.
As an example, the article in the OP talks about the availability of solar being an issue, at night or on overcast days. Problem solved. That was easy.
Then let private industry invert a life vest BEFORE we dive off the deep end.
Conservatives kind of knee-jerk oppose anything green.
That must be why the ultra-leftist Dick Nixon created the EPA.
It is the premise of the OP.'No nukes' ring any bells?
![]()
Remind me, what happened when a offshore wind farm was proposed near Hyannis Port?
Wind Farm? Not Off My Back Porch
March 30, 2007 — -- A major battle in the politics of alternative energy has moved to a final phase in Washington, and a senator named Kennedy with a waterfront view and a bone to pick awaits.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=2995334&page=1
And more recently....
Group to file lawsuit Wednesday against wind farm planned for waters off Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket
https://www.bostonherald.com/2021/08/24/group-to-file-lawsuit-wednesday-against-wind-farm-planned-for-waters-off-marthas-vineyard/
Who said that, old pal?
It is the premise of the OP. Ask Tom about modern safe nukes.
Yes it is and get back to me after you understand baseload generation.No, it's not, and I'm asking Y O U.
Yes it is and get back to me after you understand baseload generation.
Actually, both are recyclable:Batteries do nothing but store energy, and most are not recyclable,
where does the energy come from to fuel the batteries? The blades from windmills are not recyclable, and must be buried!
I said nothing about whether it is doable now or 'suffering'.I am for developing clean energy to the point where it is sustainable it's not now and we should not suffer while it gets there. Solar panels are also very hard to recycle!
Not totally true. Nixon created both OSHA and the EPA at a time when they were sorely needed. With OSHA, unions and employers alike really weren't taking worker safety seriously. Yea, all you union lovers, your union didn't give a shit about your safety. Anyway, there were over 100,000 serious injuries on the job in the US every year. Tens of thousands of people died in work related accidents.
The EPA was needed at a time when there were rivers catching fire, huge chemical dumps accumulating, and air pollution was like China's today.
What happened over time is these agencies saw a combination of bureaucrats and Leftists move in. The result of that was they've gotten a "zero tolerance" mentality now. That is, they think that unless something is 100% safe or pollution is at zero, they haven't done enough. Today they're exponentially driving up the cost of everything they regulate for near zero improvements on the stuff regulated.
So, good ideas with good intentions turned into evil ideas with destruction as their goal.
I bring up computers a lot, but these same debates were going on in the '70's about computers ever having a practical use for individuals.
There really isn't a "can't" with technology. We can go back through all of human history. When we want to do something & we set our minds to it, it happens. And technological advancement is exponential.