Putin brings back gold standard. Was that his plan all along? America is doomed!!

The coin doesn't exist without adding the correct hash to the blockchain.
Yes it does.
The hash may be correct but it won't become a coin unless you are first to record the hash.
The hash IS the Coin.
So you can get all the hash results you want. None of them will be Coins until you are connected to the internet. The odds of getting a correct hash when not connected and then being first when you do connect later are so low they might as well be zero.
You are speaking of a transaction again. Math errors: failure to declare boundary. Failure to declare randX.

Argument from randU fallacy.
 
Yes it does.

The hash IS the Coin.

You are speaking of a transaction again. Math errors: failure to declare boundary. Failure to declare randX.

If the hash is the coin then there could be multiple copies of the coin. As soon as the hash is accepted by the blockchain any other copies become invalid because the next hash required by the blockchain will be different.
The Bitcoin is created by the transaction because the only way the Bitcoin can exist is if the blockchain changes to reflect that Bitcoin. The Bitcoin can not exist without the blockchain since the only way to verify that the bitcoin exists is by accessing the blockchain.

Argument from randU fallacy.
Fallacy fallacy
The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, almost always Into the Night, claims a fallacy in order to appear smarter than they actually are.
 
Yes it does. Apparently you don't know what it means. Now you want to quibble over semantics.

I know that extracting gold from previously mined activity is not mining

I know that when we mine a bit coin, we increase the supply of bit coin - and the same is true of gold

I know you are a moron
 
aaa-png.946727
 
If the hash is the coin then there could be multiple copies of the coin.
Not likely.
As soon as the hash is accepted by the blockchain any other copies become invalid because the next hash required by the blockchain will be different.
There is no 'next hash required'. The blockchain has no sequence in hashes.
The Bitcoin is created by the transaction because the only way the Bitcoin can exist is if the blockchain changes to reflect that Bitcoin. The Bitcoin can not exist without the blockchain since the only way to verify that the bitcoin exists is by accessing the blockchain.
Fine. Have it your way. There is obviously no educating you on the difference between a Coin and a transaction.
 
At about three cents an ounce, gasoline looks like a bargain next to gold.

Gold zoomed past $2,000 an ounce on Tuesday.

Inflation here, and war involving a country responsible for mining so many precious metals over there, makes all the bad news good news for holders of precious metals, particularly palladium. It reached $3,169 an ounce today..
 
Never said it did. Contextomy fallacy. Semantics fallacies. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

shit stain has to lie to get out from his retarded posts

typically shit stain behavior

and yes you did. I said mining increases the supply - you said it creates a coin.

so how does mining gold create a coin you fucktard?
 
Not likely.

There is no 'next hash required'. The blockchain has no sequence in hashes.

Fine. Have it your way. There is obviously no educating you on the difference between a Coin and a transaction.

ROFLMAO. I guess you should tell Satoshi Nakamoto that he is wrong when he says this in the paper he wrote explaining how Bitcoin works:

We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures.
...
By convention, the first transaction in a block is a special transaction that starts a new coin owned
by the creator of the block.



The coin can't exist without the transaction because the only way to verify the coin is through verification on the peer to peer system.



The block has no sequence of hashes?
Once again, let's let Satoshi Nakamoto explain it:
The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing
the proof-of-work.
 
They don't trade in dollars already. What's the diff? Neither Visa nor Mastercard are dollars.

True, but the world standard still seems to be the US dollar. Maybe not so much what it is, but what perceptions are, and Vise and Mastercard are US companies.. Exposing that many people to think otherwise and with China pushing very hard to topple our throne with their currency I think the point above makes one question.
 
shit stain has to lie to get out from his retarded posts

typically shit stain behavior

and yes you did. I said mining increases the supply - you said it creates a coin.

so how does mining gold create a coin you fucktard?

RQAA. Insult fallacies. No argument presented.
 
ROFLMAO. I guess you should tell Satoshi Nakamoto that he is wrong when he says this in the paper he wrote explaining how Bitcoin works:

We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures.
...
By convention, the first transaction in a block is a special transaction that starts a new coin owned
by the creator of the block.



The coin can't exist without the transaction because the only way to verify the coin is through verification on the peer to peer system.



The block has no sequence of hashes?
Once again, let's let Satoshi Nakamoto explain it:
The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing
the proof-of-work.

That would be YOUR problem. Inversion fallacy (again).
 
Back
Top