NYT Reporter: Jan 6 Media Coverage ‘Overreaction,’ FBI Involved, Event Was Not Organi

V

volsrock

Verified User
Pulitzer Prize Winning New York Times Reporter: January 6 Media Coverage ‘Overreaction,’ FBI Involved, Event Was Not Organized Despite Ongoing Narrative


NYT National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, contradicts his own January 6 reporting: “There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.”

Rosenberg: “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun!”

Rosenberg: “I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are like ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘f*ck off!’”

Rosenberg: “I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, ‘dude come on, you were not in any danger.’”

Rosenberg: “These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches.”

Rosenberg: "They were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

Rosenberg RESPONDS: “Will I stand by those comments? Absolutely.”

VIDEO

https://www.projectveritas.com/news...york-times-reporter-january-6-media-coverage/
 
volsrock said:
Pulitzer Prize Winning New York Times Reporter: January 6 Media Coverage ‘Overreaction,’ FBI Involved, Event Was Not Organized Despite Ongoing Narrative


NYT National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, contradicts his own January 6 reporting: “There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.”

Rosenberg: “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun!”

Rosenberg: “I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are like ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘f*ck off!’”

Rosenberg: “I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, ‘dude come on, you were not in any danger.’”

Rosenberg: “These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches.”

Rosenberg: "They were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

Rosenberg RESPONDS: “Will I stand by those comments? Absolutely.”

VIDEO

https://www.projectveritas.com/news...york-times-reporter-january-6-media-coverage/
Click to expand...


Cite the NY Times. Otherwise, just more bullshit.
 
So once again, a hyped-political narrative from the “deep state” in Washington DC is shown to be pure lies and propaganda.
 
Project Veritas?

laugh-dosequis.gif
 
volsrock said:
So once again, a hyped-political narrative from the “deep state” in Washington DC is shown to be pure lies and propaganda.
Click to expand...

No. Once again Veritas edits a video to try to get it to show something that doesn't exist. The interesting thing is how Veritas has sued the NY Times and demanded they stop doing any reporting on Veritas while the suit is ongoing and then they pull this shit. I don't think the judge will be happy with them. It certainly will endanger Veritas' claims in court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top