The Post; NATO was arming Ukraine for ' hybrid war ' against Russia last year

moon said:
It's a fact, monkey. The population totals of the 40 countries which did NOT condemn Russia number half the world.
Truth is a peace asset. You ain't.
Click to expand...

So population matters in terms of representation at the UN but not in terms of representation within each country?
 
moon said:
Truth doesn't flounder, dumbass. Half the world sees NATO aggression.
Click to expand...

Whoa. That is a hysterical leap. Now we understand why you gathered an irrelevant figure. You wanted to pervert "half of the world population ABSTAINED from condemning Russia for many reasons" into "half of the world population VOTED AGAINST condemning Russia because they see NATO aggression".

What a crackpot.
 
Legion said:
Which will exacerbate the conflict.
Click to expand...

Probably. Which is where we are now.
We're also stuck with Brandon , or if he steps down, Horizontal Harris for the next three yrs.
:dunno:
It will be interesting and take a few yrs, if not decades , how this all plays out.
 
moon said:
I'm just anti-American stupidity.
Odd that you should feel offended.
Click to expand...

Are you drunk? First you claim that the UN vote means that half of the world opposes NATO. Now *you* claim that *I* perceive some sort of "offense". You're a mess right now.
 
Diesel said:
moon is anti-American in the same way Republicans are anti-liberal. It doesn't matter what the subject is. moon will support whatever he thinks is the opposite of the American position. Republicans will support whatever they think will annoy liberals. It's really that simple.
Click to expand...

OK.
 
Diesel said:
Whoa. That is a hysterical leap. Now we understand why you gathered an irrelevant figure. You wanted to pervert "half of the world population ABSTAINED from condemning Russia for many reasons" into "half of the world population VOTED AGAINST condemning Russia because they see NATO aggression".
Click to expand...

Sure. There's a reason for abstentions from condemnation. ' Reason ' isn't integrated into your mental processes though, is it.

Now back up your claims or stfu.
 
Diesel said:
Are you drunk? First you claim that the UN vote means that half of the world opposes NATO. Now *you* claim that *I* perceive some sort of "offense". You're a mess right now.
Click to expand...

No, it's just that having your ego deflated has affected your equilibrium.


Haw, haw...................................haw.

Now back up your claim or stfu.
 
moon said:
Sure. There's a reason for abstentions from condemnation. ' Reason ' isn't integrated into your mental processes though, is it.

Now back up your claims or stfu.
Click to expand...

Something really is wrong with you. Every time you lose a debate, which appears to me to be very often, you curl into a ball in the corner and say that some unspecified claim hasn't been backed up. You've been doing it all week and perhaps much longer than that.

You made the completely meaningless observation that UN votes from countries that represent half of the world's population abstained from the Russia vote. And we all said, "It doesn't matter, moon. That's not how votes get counted in the UN. Sound familiar?"

Then you said, "So the fact that countries representing half of the world's population abstained means that half of the world opposes the US and NATO."

. . .

I don't expect you to get it, but to anyone else who is reading with a clear mind and eye, that is a bat shit crazy leap. An analogy would be, "My parents said I can't spend the night at your house." "I know why. Your parents hate my dog."

Why don't you read the list of countries that abstained from the vote? You think India, Burundi, South Africa, Laos, Madagascar, etc., etc. abstained from voting because they, your exact words, "see NATO aggression"?

Get a fucking grip or shut the fuck up yourself.
 
Diesel said:
Something really is wrong with you. Every time you lose a debate, which appears to me to be very often, you curl into a ball in the corner and say that some unspecified claim hasn't been backed up. You've been doing it all week and perhaps much longer than that.

You made the completely meaningless observation that UN votes from countries that represent half of the world's population abstained from the Russia vote. And we all said, "It doesn't matter, moon. That's not how votes get counted in the UN. Sound familiar?"

Then you said, "So the fact that countries representing half of the world's population abstained means that half of the world opposes the US and NATO."

. . .

I don't expect you to get it, but to anyone else who is reading with a clear mind and eye, that is a bat shit crazy leap. An analogy would be, "My parents said I can't spend the night at your house." "I know why. Your parents hate my dog."

Why don't you read the list of countries that abstained from the vote? You think India, Burundi, South Africa, Laos, Madagascar, etc., etc. abstained from voting because they, your exact words, "see NATO aggression"?

Get a fucking grip or shut the fuck up yourself.
Click to expand...

Your nonsense is characteristic- whether monosyllabic or long winded.
 
VDH makes the point that those who cant stop the inflow of weapons to their enemy almost always lose.

I wonder what the Russians are going to do about this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top