So, You Want $15 An Hour?

I'm still waiting for you to actually answer questions but you're a leftist retard and can't. Id respect you more if you won't answer them but it's clear you can't so all I have is pity for you. That or you're actually the non American and you read something and thought you'd try spewing that stupidity here.
Too bad right-wingers are just plain liars.
 
Obviously, you don't know what a fallacy is either.

A fallacy is an error in logic. Logic is a closed system like mathematics. It is the equivalent of making a math error.

It thinks we are here to convince it yet it is the one making all the claims. Lmfao.
 
This "person" is a retard. Maybe an EU reject who read something about the constitution and thought it would try arguing about it here.

Sadly, he probably American. Too many people in this country have never read the Constitution of the United States nor even their own State constitution.
Democrats, of course, discard all constitutions.
 
Sadly, he probably American. Too many people in this country have never read the Constitution of the United States nor even their own State constitution.
Democrats, of course, discard all constitutions.

You know that's probably the case. Sad as it is it's the truth. I'm still waiting for evidence that Article 1 talks about social laws.
 
It thinks we are here to convince it yet it is the one making all the claims. Lmfao.

I noticed that. Good catch.

He is claiming:
* price controls work (even though they don't).
* price controls are necessary (even though they don't work and are fascist in nature, which is government manipulation of markets).
* this is somehow incorporated into the Constitution somewhere.
* that capitalism has failed (even though it never has).
* that fascism is the answer to everything, especially via price controls and other government manipulations of markets.
* that either of us are actually making any claims.

In a sense, the last one is somewhat correct. I am claiming he is making fallacy after fallacy.
 
That poster didn't think things through but now has to try and retain some dignity. I suspect we will get more repeating but no actual information.

Resorting to insults is the usual result of running out of arguments. Like a little child, they start calling people names. I see this among Democrats and other socialists a lot. Sometimes it goes further, spewing random phrases and meaningless buzzwords and even labeling them as 'sCiEnCe'. This is a favorite tactic of the Church of Covid, the Church of Global Warming, the Church of the Ozone Hole, and the Church of Green.

When arguing for the Church of Karl Marx, substitute the word 'eCoNoMiCs' for 'sCiEnCe'.

These people understand neither.
 
I noticed that. Good catch.

He is claiming:
* price controls work (even though they don't).
* price controls are necessary (even though they don't work and are fascist in nature, which is government manipulation of markets).
* this is somehow incorporated into the Constitution somewhere.
* that capitalism has failed (even though it never has).
* that fascism is the answer to everything, especially via price controls and other government manipulations of markets.
* that either of us are actually making any claims.

In a sense, the last one is somewhat correct. I am claiming he is making fallacy after fallacy.

My claim is simply that the poster can't back up any of their claims. So fair I'm not wrong.
 
Back
Top