Mr. Tiny Penis, the trial is over and Mr. Rittenhouse was found not guilty. Piss and moan all you want but it is over.
Now the lawsuits begin.
Saint Kyle!
- Thread starter MAGA MAN
- Start date
Mr. Tiny Penis, the trial is over and Mr. Rittenhouse was found not guilty. Piss and moan all you want but it is over.
Now the lawsuits begin.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Fascinating....two pieces of shyte that share a fatal bigotry regarding black folk and anyone they perceive as the "other" literally get away with murder and then arrogantly try to push their "righteous vindication" agenda. What's next, local politics? Bet they have the vote of a our resident MAGA members/oathers/teaparty/neocon type folk on these threads here. Amazing.
Nomad
Verified User
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Yes, it will be interesting to see if widdle Kyle's fanbase that footed the bill to keep him out of jail will do the same for this attempted defamation lawsuit. Whoopee's loaded, so she's got more gun powder in her legal arsenal.
Into the Night
Contributor
Kyle didn't shoot anyone that was 'black'. Racism.
Into the Night
Contributor
Hallucination.
Well you have to admit it would help combat climate change or at least put to rest the debate whether or not American humans cause it. There’s a silver ling for everything.
Maybe if we'd quit poking all the holes (with "space exploration") in our atmosphere might help?
No shit, kid. Did your mommy read that to you from her newspaper or did your hear about it in Social Studies?
Young punks like you weren't around for OJ, Clinton's impeachment and other examples of "100% not guilty". LOL
Stringfellow Hawk
Member
1. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/24/business/media/washington-post-lawsuit-covington-student.html
2. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...y-teen-in-lincoln-memorial-case-idUSKBN1Z70CL
3. https://www.mitchell-attorneys.com/internet-defamation
4. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...tube-defamation-case-her-victory-ncna1288049- this one was over gossip
5. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/world/australia/geoffrey-rush-defamation.html
6. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...defamation-case-over-abc-four-corners-episode
Stringfellow Hawk
Member
self defense, if attacked here I have a legal right to shoot my attackers, pretty much anywhere except IL, NY, and CA
Dumbass; the first two are Nickie. The third was two business assholes, not "media" as you asserted. I stopped wasting my time after that.
Stringfellow Hawk
Member
All were media whiny ass baby, run from facts as usual and call people names just like the 8 year old you are
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Saint Kyle knows when he can shoot! Clicked off all five boxes of the self defense laws!
Innocence
You must be the innocent party in the encounter. You can't start the fight. If you start the fight or if you provoked the attack then you don't have the legal right to self-defense.
Proportionality
Your use of defensive force must be proportional to the threat. If you are defending against a threat of low physical harm (IE a punch in the face that is not likely to cause serious injury or death) then you do not have the legal right to use deadly force in defense of that threat.
You may legally only use deadly force such as a gun to defend against a threat of serious bodily injury or death.
Imminence
You may only defend against a threat that is immediate. You may not defend against a past threat that is no longer active or against a potential future threat that is not immediate.
Reasonableness
What you perceive, think, and do must be reasonable based on what a reasonable person of your circumstances would have thought, felt, or believed as it relates to each of the elements of self-defense.
Avoidance (The 5th Element)
Only true on a small number of states, and even within those states only true outside the home; you must make any reasonable attempt to safely retreat from the threat before using force in defense of that threat.
Innocence
You must be the innocent party in the encounter. You can't start the fight. If you start the fight or if you provoked the attack then you don't have the legal right to self-defense.
Proportionality
Your use of defensive force must be proportional to the threat. If you are defending against a threat of low physical harm (IE a punch in the face that is not likely to cause serious injury or death) then you do not have the legal right to use deadly force in defense of that threat.
You may legally only use deadly force such as a gun to defend against a threat of serious bodily injury or death.
Imminence
You may only defend against a threat that is immediate. You may not defend against a past threat that is no longer active or against a potential future threat that is not immediate.
Reasonableness
What you perceive, think, and do must be reasonable based on what a reasonable person of your circumstances would have thought, felt, or believed as it relates to each of the elements of self-defense.
Avoidance (The 5th Element)
Only true on a small number of states, and even within those states only true outside the home; you must make any reasonable attempt to safely retreat from the threat before using force in defense of that threat.