BidenPresident
Verified User
Both the Clintons went to public high schools.
Right wingers know how to bash education. That's about it.
Both the Clintons went to public high schools.
Both the Clintons went to public high schools.
So ONE, solitary, human being makes a list?
Some assistant editor at Forbes I have never heard of?
And Bang!!!
You assume it is the Nobel Prize of ascertaining good, post-secondary education.
Noted.
You must be a salespersons dream.
Bye now.
So ONE, solitary, human being makes a list?
Some assistant editor at Forbes I have never heard of?
And Bang!!!
You assume it is the Nobel Prize of ascertaining good, post-secondary education.
Noted.
You must be a salespersons dream.
Bye now.
Ok. Not a rhetorical question, is there a point there?
Moral of the story: Socialist public universities are the best bang for the buck.
The Top Ten:
Northwestern University
University of Pennsylvania
University of California Los Angeles
Harvard
MIT
Colombia
Princeton
Yale
University of California Berkeley
Now Cal at#1 is laughable. UCLA at #8 is truly off the charts laughable.
UC Berkley and UCLA are both tied to major powerhouse industries in America, Silicon Valley and Hollywood. They are hardly jokes.
Forbes ranked schools on return on investment, and those two schools are relatively cheap, with very high returns on investment.
UC Berkley and UCLA are both tied to major powerhouse industries in America, Silicon Valley and Hollywood. They are hardly jokes.
Forbes ranked schools on return on investment, and those two schools are relatively cheap, with very high returns on investment.
Your claim that Democrats are the product of private boarding schools sort of falls apart.
Anyone who reaches high office will usually have a lot of success before that, so it would not be unexpected that they might have gone to an Ivy League. But also many politicians have a working class background. Through hard work, some have risen up to great heights. That is not a partisan observation, but cuts both ways.
UC Berkley and UCLA are both tied to major powerhouse industries in America, Silicon Valley and Hollywood. They are hardly jokes.
Forbes ranked schools on return on investment, and those two schools are relatively cheap, with very high returns on investment.
UC Berkeley is a major research university whose reputation preceded Silicon Valley--which owes more to Stanford.
Once again, you speak to something you know nothing about Walt. You poor dumb bastard. democrat of course.
Definitely, Stanford is even more connected to Silicon Valley than Berkley. Berkley is definitely in second place in outcome(salary), as the Forbes list shows. The reason Berkley beats Stanford is because the list is about return on investment. Berkley has a slightly lower outcome, but a much lower investment(tuition).
Cal is a joke at #1. US News and World Report is basically the go to for rankings and they always have Cal in the 20's. And don't even start with Westwood High. UCLA has Hollywood? Dude, 'SC film school is #1 in the country. If you want to work in Hollywood you go to 'SC. And again, US News and World Report always has them in the 20's, not top 10.
My graduate school is towards the top of that list. I actually know a lot about that.
You do not even have a mother fucking GED.
It has a clear method. Berkley has a high return on investment. That is just a fact.
Definitely, Stanford is even more connected to Silicon Valley than Berkley. Berkley is definitely in second place in outcome(salary), as the Forbes list shows. The reason Berkley beats Stanford is because the list is about return on investment. Berkley has a slightly lower outcome, but a much lower investment(tuition).