If you just read the OP...that explains it.
TL; DR OP
Jesus fucking Christ, the Second Amendment was one paragraph. Your version looks like something a high school junior would write for extra credit.
Maybe you'll learn succinctness in college.
If you just read the OP...that explains it.
If you just read the OP...that explains it.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State
That's pretty clear by itself. No law passed in 1956 will change that.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
That's also clear. It's TWO separate things and can be associated with each other.
A small community can form a small militia in case SHTF according to the 2nd Amendment.
When our government collapses, who do we rely on?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State
That's pretty clear by itself. No law passed in 1956 will change that.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
That's also clear. It's TWO separate things and can be associated with each other.
A small community can form a small militia in case SHTF according to the 2nd Amendment.
When our government collapses, who do we rely on?
TL; DR OP
Jesus fucking Christ, the Second Amendment was one paragraph. Your version looks like something a high school junior would write for extra credit.
Maybe you'll learn succinctness in college.![]()
Depends on who has control of the big toys. A little gun isn’t going to do much against a drone.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State
That's pretty clear by itself. No law passed in 1956 will change that.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
That's also clear. It's TWO separate things and can be associated with each other.
A small community can form a small militia in case SHTF according to the 2nd Amendment.
When our government collapses, who do we rely on?
Agreed. A militia addresses concerns protecting the autonomy and security of each state plus the concern about Federal overreach. It was a given that citizens had a right to self-defense, but since a militia required firearms, they put the firearms in writing.
Depends on who has control of the big toys. A little gun isn’t going to do much against a drone.
Depends on who has control of the big toys. A little gun isn’t going to do much against a drone.
To me it's pretty clear that the militia and the people are one and the same. If "the people" want to organize a militia, they are free to do so. They are not a threat to the government.
In a nutshell, the militia are the people and the people are the militia.
Tell me if I am wrong.
Maybe you will learn what 'trolling' means?
Why don't you go and feed your cats?
That is one thing I assume you are good at.
I'd be impressed if you could explain in a clear and concise manner what that link means in support of your position. TIA but I won't hold my breath.![]()
The right of citizens to have arms is essential to a community being able to form a militia.
The Butthurt is strong in you, son. If you want to be a success in life, grow a thicker skin.
The Butthurt is strong in you, son. If you want to be a success in life, grow a thicker skin.
You better hope they are or that they believe in limiting human casualties.Trust me the militias will be supplied with the right toys.![]()
No....the truth is that you cannot read anything that is too long.
You have stated it - in essence - many times.
If you are not bright/educated enough to digest long text?
Or you have ADHD?
That is neither my problem nor my concern.
By Troll.