Poll Finds 45% Of Democratic Voters Want COVID Internment Camps For The Unvaccinated.

McRocket said:
The article is irrelevant.
The poll is the thing.
Strange you are not aware of that.

Now, I freely admit that Rasmussen is NOT the best source for hyper-accurate polling.
But the fact that they even did the poll at all shows how crazy things are getting on the left in this regard.

Bye now.
Click to expand...

I took you off ignore so I can carve you up. We’ll start here. If the article is irrelevant why do you keep quoting it? Use the results and then try to use YOUR OWN words to comment on it instead of quoting the hyperbole if this right wing rag site. I showed you how a smart person would do that. Your turn.
 
McRocket said:
As per usual (it seems)...you skipped over the questions I asked you.

3) where exactly did I claim I was 'intellectually superior'?
Let me know when you admit there is no post of that nature.

Man...in all seriousness?

You are making a fool out of yourself.
You are clearly out of your depth.

Sadly, I suspect you are so delusional that you actually think you are coming across as 'intelligent' and 'emotionally together'.
Sorry man...in all honesty - you are not.

I think it's times you seek professional help there gramps.
It's not too late.

Unless you are senile...then it IS too late.
But drugs can slow the process down.

Get help!!!
Click to expand...
DU is coming across exactly as intended and your responses are exactly what he intended. The sooner you figure that out the better off you’ll be. I thought you said you were smart?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Agreed.

It's difficult to discern if they had a high IQ at one time and suffered a stroke, TBI or other problem that caused adverse cognitive issues or if they are just liars living a fantasy life online.

Stevie (Steven VanderMolen) was bipolar and would go off his meds.

Spaz (Matt Stefanowicz the Polish Racist) was obviously under 100 but he could have been smarter at one time and suffered an injury or he was just a lying retard.

McRickets believes that high intelligence can't be demonstrated online even while proclaiming his high IQ despite evidence to the contrary. WTF?
Click to expand...

125 is not even super bright; it's just high average. It's interesting that the pretenders use the wording "government-tested IQ," isn't it? They then use that to promote their various cuckoo stories about how bad, evil, incompetent, etc. that same government is.

:laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:
 
McRocket said:
Hey...the great troll finally called me 'stupid'!
A right of passage.

And if you had bothered to read the OP.
You would see that the words 'internment camp' were in the title of the article I quoted.
Duh!

I STRONGLY suggest you learn to read better before you start typing your ad hominem's.
That way?
They will make a modicum of sense, at least.

Have a nice day, Mr. Troll.
Click to expand...

So I win ten bucks. The words ‘internment camps’ were not in the poll And you base your entire OP on an article that you yourself claim is irrelevant. Look at the big brain on Rocket Man!!!
 
McRocket said:
If I scream in all caps and make it bold will you believe me?
Click to expand...

Nope. You've proven nothing. I posted the actual poll which gives NO demographic information. Repeating lies does not magically turn them into truth. Even people with an IQ of 80 know this. You would too if yours was that high. :laugh:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
125 is not even super bright; it's just high average. It's interesting that the pretenders use the wording "government-tested IQ," isn't it? They then use that to promote their various cuckoo stories about how bad, evil, incompetent, etc. that same government is.

:laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:
Click to expand...

Finally we find hard evidence that the government is lying to us ��
 
Concart said:
Smart people don’t have to tell others about how smart they are. You are what you post. Nothing more, nothing less. Every claim made here should be taken with a grain of salt. The more someone brags the less likely those claims are true. Because when they are made constantly they are made in a feeble attempt to gain credibility. Intelligent people say intelligent things. That’s the only measure that counts on sites like this and McRocket is a failure on that count. The title of this thread is proof of that.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Something young Mr. McRickets doesn't understand despite his self-proclaimed "high IQ".
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Actually it would not have, but nice try. Unlike you sheep, when I see a wild-ass patently bullshit claim like "Male Trump Voters Prefer Fucking Guys" post, I figure it's bullshit and walk on by.

You guys... not so much.
Click to expand...

you guys are the worst, you label one side of the aisle protests insurrectionists, and your side peaceful protests while arson, assault, and murder of citizens were taking place.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
125 is not even super bright; it's just high average. It's interesting that the pretenders use the wording "government-tested IQ," isn't it? They then use that to promote their various cuckoo stories about how bad, evil, incompetent, etc. that same government is.

:laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO Excellent point; McRickets doesn't trust the government except when it suits him.
 
Concart said:
I took you off ignore so I can carve you up. We’ll start here. If the article is irrelevant why do you keep quoting it? Use the results and then try to use YOUR OWN words to comment on it instead of quoting the hyperbole if this right wing rag site. I showed you how a smart person would do that. Your turn.
Click to expand...

Everyone should have a hobby. Carving up trolls and idiots on the Internet is one of mine too!

When I was new here I asked Stevie (Steven VanderMolen AKA Peace n Safety before he was banned) to read a paragraph he supplied and put it into his own words. He couldn't do it.

I asked Spaz, the Polish Racist, the same question. Same non-response. It's like asking a blind man to see. They can't do it.
 
Hello McRocket,

McRocket said:
Majority want unvaxxed locked in their homes, close to half want people jailed for questioning jabs.

https://summit.news/2022/01/17/poll...-covid-internment-camps-for-the-unvaccinated/

From the survey:

'– Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Such a proposal is opposed by 61% of all likely voters, including 79% of Republicans and 71% of unaffiliated voters.

– Nearly half (48%) of Democratic voters think federal and state governments should be able to fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines on social media, television, radio, or in online or digital publications. Only 27% of all voters – including just 14% of Republicans and 18% of unaffiliated voters – favor criminal punishment of vaccine critics.

– Forty-five percent (45%) of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Such a policy would be opposed by a strong majority (71%) of all voters, with 78% of Republicans and 64% of unaffiliated voters saying they would Strongly Oppose putting the unvaccinated in “designated facilities.”

– While about two-thirds (66%) of likely voters would be against governments using digital devices to track unvaccinated people to ensure that they are quarantined or socially distancing from others, 47% of Democrats favor a government tracking program for those who won’t get the COVID-19 vaccine.

How far are Democrats willing to go in punishing the unvaccinated? Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine. That’s much more than twice the level of support in the rest of the electorate – seven percent (7%) of Republicans and 11% of unaffiliated voters – for such a policy.'

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pu...s_support_harsh_measures_against_unvaccinated


I am not huge on Rasmussen.

But still...
tracking devices?
Separating parents from their children?
Internment camps?

This is starting to get frigging NUTS.
Click to expand...

Why is it that I have never even heard of Summit News? Is it because it is a heavily right-biased outfit and not mainstream news?

Why is it that the selected poll is from Rasmussen, known for right-biased polling?

Why is it that this was done through the right wing Heartland Institute, a shill for big nasty corporate PR?

"The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.[3]

Founded in 1984, it worked with tobacco company Philip Morris throughout the 1990s to attempt to discredit the health risks of secondhand smoke and lobby against smoking bans.[4][5]: 233–34 [6] Since the 2000s, the Heartland Institute has been a leading promoter of climate change denial.[7][8] " wiki

Can these results really be trusted?

Or are they just cherry-picked slanted right wing propaganda.
 
Stringfellow Hawk said:
you guys are the worst, you label one side of the aisle protests insurrectionists, and your side peaceful protests while arson, assault, and murder of citizens were taking place.
Click to expand...

Not me, dipshit. I strongly favor killing all terrorists. Why do you give some terrorists a pass, MAGA-brain?

61nieu.gif
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello McRocket,

Why is it that I have never even heard of Summit News? Is it because it is a heavily right-biased outfit and not mainstream news?

Why is it that the selected poll is from Rasmussen, known for right-biased polling?

Why is it that this was done through the right wing Heartland Institute, a shill for big nasty corporate PR?

"The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.[3]

Founded in 1984, it worked with tobacco company Philip Morris throughout the 1990s to attempt to discredit the health risks of secondhand smoke and lobby against smoking bans.[4][5]: 233–34 [6] Since the 2000s, the Heartland Institute has been a leading promoter of climate change denial.[7][8] " wiki

Can these results really be trusted?

Or are they just cherry-picked slanted right wing propaganda.
Click to expand...
Summit News is, indeed, extremely Right Wing and stupid just like McRickets.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/summit-news/
extremeright031.png


Overall, we rate Summit News Questionable based on Extreme Right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, misleading and unproven stories, and a complete lack of transparency.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello McRocket,



Why is it that I have never even heard of Summit News? Is it because it is a heavily right-biased outfit and not mainstream news?

Why is it that the selected poll is from Rasmussen, known for right-biased polling?

Why is it that this was done through the right wing Heartland Institute, a shill for big nasty corporate PR?

"The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.[3]

Founded in 1984, it worked with tobacco company Philip Morris throughout the 1990s to attempt to discredit the health risks of secondhand smoke and lobby against smoking bans.[4][5]: 233–34 [6] Since the 2000s, the Heartland Institute has been a leading promoter of climate change denial.[7][8] " wiki

Can these results really be trusted?

Or are they just cherry-picked slanted right wing propaganda.
Click to expand...

I posted the actual poll results. No where do they indicate demographic breakdown of which respondents belonged to which parties.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello McRocket,



Why is it that I have never even heard of Summit News? Is it because it is a heavily right-biased outfit and not mainstream news?

Why is it that the selected poll is from Rasmussen, known for right-biased polling?

Why is it that this was done through the right wing Heartland Institute, a shill for big nasty corporate PR?

"The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.[3]

Founded in 1984, it worked with tobacco company Philip Morris throughout the 1990s to attempt to discredit the health risks of secondhand smoke and lobby against smoking bans.[4][5]: 233–34 [6] Since the 2000s, the Heartland Institute has been a leading promoter of climate change denial.[7][8] " wiki

Can these results really be trusted?

Or are they just cherry-picked slanted right wing propaganda.
Click to expand...

You're going to have to define 'climate change' someday, moron.
Science doesn't use consensus. There is no voting bloc in science. There is no theory of science about an undefined phrase.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top