The mother of Ashli Babbitt speaks one year after her daughter’s death

AProudLefty said:
You are being asked to provide information as part of an internal and/or administrative investigation. This is a voluntary interview and you do not have to answer questions if your answers would tend to implicate you in a crime. No disciplinary action will be taken against you solely for refusing to answer questions. However, the evidentiary value of your silence may be considered in administrative proceedings as part of the facts surrounding your case. Any statement you do choose to provide may be used as evidence in criminal and/or administrative proceedings.
Click to expand...
You forgot this one :rolleyes:

"If you refuse to answer my questions, you will be subject to immediate dismissal."
 
After January 6, the United States Capitol Police promised to provide an update on its internal investigations related to the attack.

This week, the USCP provided the Department of Justice the administrative cases as part of the ongoing discovery production in the prosecution of the January 6 rioters. Officer names, witness names, and complainant names were redacted.

The USCP’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) launched 38 internal investigations. The U.S. Attorney’s Office did not find sufficient evidence that any of the officers committed a crime.

OPR was able to identify the officers involved in 26 of the cases. (Some complaints did not contain enough information to identify the officer at the center of the complaint.)

In 20 of the cases, no wrongdoing was found.

Violations were sustained and disciplinary action was recommended in six cases;

Three for conduct unbecoming
One for failure to comply with directives
One for improper remarks
One for improper dissemination of information


https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/uscp-completes-internal-investigation-january-6-officer-involved
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top