The Key Question for Trumps criminality...

[Into the Night]

You are wrong, can you not think outside you’re a little closed in brain?

Insult fallacy. Argument of the stone fallacy.

If Trump called in the National Guard right away, as soon as he knew of the insurrection not a crime.

There was no insurrection.

If Trump did nothing, because he had no viable options, that is not a crime.

The National Guard are not policemen. What crime?

I could go on with many more options,

Sure. You can keep fabricating hallucinations and attempt to use them as a proof all day. You normally do.

you’re closed in mind can’t seem to grasp this reality.

Define 'reality'.

If however, Trump did nothing because he hoped doing nothing would Prevent Congress from certifying the election, that was a crime.

What election? There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

 

[Blackcat13th]

"Did Donald Trump, through action or inaction, corruptly seek to obstruct or impede Congress’ official proceeding to count electoral votes?”

If there is strong evidence the answer to this is yes, Trump should serve time.

Nah, who cares what a bunch of slime bag dope pushers think.

Congress can go suck an egg.

I mean, if no one can even be brought to examine the evidence, i cant see their proceedings were lawful to begin with.

Supposed insurrection = people jay walking to stop a mugging.

 

[Into the Night]

Once again you demonstrated your lack of understanding of fallacies.

I'll use a simple example. If you see a person trapped in a fire and you walk away, are or are you not guilty?

Of what?

 

[Into the Night]

Dumb Fallacy Fallacy

Fallacy fallacy. Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Actually, poor attempt at deflection.

Fallacy fallacy. There was no deflection here.

 

[Into the Night]

And orange people?

Are they like the Lizard people?

 

[Into the Night]

And we will…

You will what?

 

[Into the Night]

Justice takes time, obstruction and corruption delays it even further.

Justice of what? What obstruction? What corruption?

 

[Into the Night]

Look, only dumb people keep talking about logical fallacies.

Denial of logic. Insult fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Now you bringing in all sorts of trivial objections. By now specifying actions I might take without knowing the specific circumstances, you are just loading the question.

Fallacy fallacy. He is not objecting. He is not loading the question either. He is answering it, as fallacious the question itself was.

"Anything" is just another sweeping generality.

No. It's a valid generality.

But in any case, I am under no specific legal requirement to help someone in that situation, only a moral one,

Correct. Here, you just agreed with Lefty's answer.

so it doesn't circle back to the original question here posed by Jarod which is based on a legal issue.

What legal issue? He is making a void argument fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Only smart people know what logical fallacies are and will explain them (unlike some other posters who regularly trot them out).

Such as...?

Idiots ignore logical fallacies because they make their positions fall apart, not to mention making any sort of argument harder to pursue.

Fallacies don't make anyone's position fall apart. There is no position. Invalid arguments are not a position. There is nothing to pursue.

 

[Into the Night]

You seem to not understand that inaction can result in a criminal charge, especially when a person is responsible for what transpired.

Contrivance. Void argument fallacy. What inaction? What person? What event?

 

[Blackcat13th]

Evidence shmevidence

 

[Into the Night]

I know what the logical fallacies are.

You have already demonstrated otherwise. Lie.

Only dumb people think talking about them makes them look smart.

Denial of logic.

Argue, make your case,

He already did.

respond to objections.

He already did.

How debate works.

There is no debate here. Only conversations.

 

[AProudLefty]

Contrivance. Void argument fallacy. What inaction? What person? What event?

Hello Donny.

 

[Into the Night]

Only dumbasses would think it's a complex question fallacy. It is not.

It is. Insult fallacy. Denial of logic.

If Trump did not influence 1/6

The day had the same length as it should have.

and was not aware that it would happen

Neither were you. Does that make you equally guilty?

and not aware it was happening,

You apparently are ignoring his calls to stand down. You are also ignoring that he did not and does not condone the rioting.

he would not be criminally responsible.

Attempted negative proof fallacy by contrivance.

 

[Into the Night]

“"firsthand testimony" that during the attack, Trump's daughter and then-senior adviser Ivanka Trump asked him to intervene.”

Intervene in what?

 

[Into the Night]

Hello Donny.

Donny isn't here.

 

[AProudLefty]

Donny isn't here.

You switched personality already?

 

[Jarod]

Intervene in what?

The attack on January 6, dipshit!