Experts warn OVER-vaccinating

Tranquillus in Exile said:
"Some experts claim the benefits of extra jabs are minimal because their primary purpose - preventing deaths and hospitalizations
- has barely waned after a year and several Covid variants."

You disagree?
Click to expand...

THE ORIGINAL PURPOSE (BILL OF GOODS) WE WERE SOLD, WAS TO "STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID".....WHICH THE LYING CORON-A-CRATS NOW TRY TO PRETEND WAS NEVER CLAIMED BY THEM....
 
Grokmaster said:
THE ORIGINAL PURPOSE (BILL OF GOODS) WE WERE SOLD, WAS TO "STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID".....WHICH THE LYING CORON-A-CRATS NOW TRY TO PRETEND WAS NEVER CLAIMED BY THEM
Click to expand...

President Trump put in all that effort personally developing vaccines - “I came up with three vaccines, all are very, very good,” Trump told Candace Owens - and you're not a bit grateful!
 
Beyond Ivermectin: Censoring Medical Journals
by Justus R. Hope, MD Nov 10, 2021

"All the contracts were signed, and all the payments were made to the journal and then the paper was published online...and it was cited and indexed in the National Library of Medicine - PubMed. That paper became part of medical history and began to be widely used because this week is the current FDA review for vaccination with the Pfizer vaccination in children age 5 to 11."

Dr. McCullough added, "It couldn't be a more important time to have a peer-reviewed paper available for the world as well as the US leaders for COVID-19 to review." But, unfortunately, the paper was subsequently and abruptly "taken down" or withdrawn by Elsevier, the journal's parent company, for no good reason.

"(Published) papers can only be withdrawn according to their rules. And according to the publication contract, they can only be pulled down if they are scientifically invalid, (contain) incorrect information, or if in fact there is a typesetting error or other problem."

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/beyond-ivermectin-censoring-medical-journals/article_b1089af2-4279-11ec-b491-5bcaf600d33c.html
 
In my selling days, we were one of the early ones introduced to hand sanitizer. The warnings to us early on were to discourage its frequent use due to the fact it might contribute to its ability to disrupt one's natural immunity.
I might say the same about cell phones and the internet.
 
aa-jpg.892808
 
THE POOR CORON-A-CRATS ARE GOING APOPLECTIC, AS THEIR PRECIOUS PANDEMIC PETERS OUT...WITH "CASES!! CASES!! CASES!!!" OF THE HARMLESS OMICRON....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top