SmarterthanYou
rebel
are you claiming that the left never pushed for a liberal SCOTUS EVER?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
The Supreme Court faces an existential crisis of legitimacy
- Thread starter BidenPresident
- Start date
are you claiming that the left never pushed for a liberal SCOTUS EVER?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Into the Night
Verified User
Okay...let's examine some various religions:
Christianity:
Christ taught that women have a special place in the kingdom of God. They bring forth children, which are of the kingdom of God. Christians also brought forth honoring mothers specifically, using a holiday.
Shinto:
No specific hatred or love for women in these religions.
Buddhism:
No specific hatred or love for women in this religion, but it DOES recognize the importance of women to bring about the reincarnation of the spirit.
Hindi:
No specific hatred or love for women in this religion, but it DOES recognize the importance of women to bring about the reincarnation of the spirit and completing the Circle of Life.
Islam:
Generally treats women as property.
Church of No God:
Treats women as property. Women are treated as less than human for many purposes.
Ethnic African:
No specific hatred or love for women in this religion, but it DOES recognize the importance of women to bring about the reincarnation of the spirit and completing the Circle of Life. Centers more on magick.
Polyandric:
Some tribes in Africa, India, and Nepal practice 'marriage' of one women to multiple men. Any children produced in this type of society are raised by the women and all of the men 'married' to her. Women are treated as a 'shared resource'.
So, no. Most religions are NOT about power over women.
Argument from randU fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
You are talking about yourself.
Into the Night
Verified User
Insult fallacies. Racism. Trolling. No argument presented.
Awesome, Grumpy. Why don't you tell everyone how the Supreme Court ruled on the Salem Witch Trials.
What about the rest? All nastiness by human beings to other human beings. That part is correct; we've been doing it throughout history.
Is that why you seek to continue the misery and hate, grumps?
My error for responding to you ... I'll try to not let it happen again.
Into the Night
Verified User
Contextomy fallacy. Stay on topic.
Into the Night
Verified User
Into the Night
Verified User
No, it isn't. The decision of having an abortion also has its consequences, which you can't escape. The anguish of homicide can weigh heavily on some, very lightly on others. But consequences they are. It is the argument from Democrats (and from Satan no less, whether you believe the Bible to be true or not) that there is no consequence resulting from choice.
Obvious to all the calm, sane people, no.
That said, only an oath-breaker and other liars would disclaim that both sides, while pushing for their own party agendas haven't pushed as hard to tilt the court as the Republicans.
When SCOTUS begins ruling against American freedoms, then you will know that you have won and the United States will fall as surely as Rome.
That's what you said the last time, grumps. Don't you remember? LOL Of course you don't. Life is sad, isn't it?
Into the Night
Verified User
Don't play dumb. You know what you said. Don't deny it.
Contextomy fallacy. Word stuffing. Lying via manufactured quote.
Trolling. No argument presented.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
absolute proof that you are a leftist.............thanks.
Into the Night
Verified User
Then it's not obvious to you.
Non-sequitur fallacy.
Buzzword fallacy. Define 'American freedoms'.
The United States has ALREADY FALLEN, thanks to the silent coup by Democrats.
You're a credit to your species, Sybil. When did Trump appoint you as his spokesman?
Awesome, Sybil.
Dude, all you do is look as crazy as Sybil when you say shit like that.
Just because I wasn't with the mob trying to hang Pence and murder all of Congress doesn't mean I wouldn't pick up arms against enemies of the Constitution, foreign and domestic.
Only a deluded moron thinks "the Democrats are coming to take our guns today so we need to overthrow the government NOW!!!!"
because the body in question, the one whom someone else is seeking to end the life of cannot defend itself.
thats the point and why it works
Where in the Constitution does the Federal government have that power? The woman is an American citizen. The zygote or blastocyst is only a potential citizen yet you are asserting the "rights" of a potential citizen override the rights of a living, breathing adult American citizen.
By what logic have you arrived at this decision? It strikes me to be almost purely religious.
It doesn't always work and one must be willing to use it. Grosskreutz carried a pistol as a deterrent but he wasn't ready to use it and it cost him an arm.