Abortion Question.

Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine in that time.

Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians.

Instead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.


Einstein. What's wrong with letting the woman make the Decision?
 
Row V Wade has been the law for nearly 50 years. Medical science has made tremendous advances in medicine in that time.

I disagree with this claim. It was never "law." It was an inferred Constitutional right by activist Supreme Court Justices.

Abortion becomes a moral and legal issue when a fetus reaches a certain stage, per the laws enacted by politicians.

No argument here.

RInstead of politicians deciding when a woman can or cannot have an abortion, how about letting the medical community decide at which point an abortion is manslaughter? Take the politics out of the formula. Let the decision be between a woman and her doctor based on AMA rulings.

The issue of abortion didn't become a divisive political issue until the activist court of 1973. This is, and always has been, a States Rights issue. Let the voters decide in their respective states.

Doctors are not the arbiters of morality.
 
That's because they are lying hypocrites with massive double standards.

iu


They must think everyone else are just as stupid as they seem to be.

It's the fallacy of assumed similarity at work.
 
Viability can be as early as 20 weeks as per medical science.

As I have stated multiple times, it changes nothing since most abortions are done within 10 weeks anyway.

Then why all the angst from the left about laws that say after 15 or 25 weeks? The Mississippi case is about a law that states no abortion after 15 weeks.

If you were dealing with facts and reality, the Democrats and their leftist minions don't believe in ANY restrictions.
:palm:
 
Last edited:
Then why all the angst from the left about laws that say after 15 or 25 weeks? The Mississippi case is about a law that states no abortion after 15 weeks.

If you were dealing with facts and reality, the Democrats and the ir leftist minions don't believe in ANY restrictions.
:palm:

I have no idea why all the angst about it. As I have stated many times, it changes nothing as most abortions are done within 15 weeks anyway.
 
Why are we talking about vaccine? Take it elsewhere, dumbass. Take your whataboutism and shove it up your ass.

He's making a relevant point you willful dumbass. You can't argue it's a woman's choice and her body then demand everyone take a vaccine. Of course you, being a low IQ, uneducated, dishonest thread trolling asshole, you aren't capable of comprehending the OBVIOUS point. :palm:
 
Deal. Instead, we'll just tell you lepers to stay home. You know, like you covidiots all said to us norms last year when governments mandated masks and social distancing to keep you fools alive.

Absurdity; the last desperate refuge for the ignorant, the dishonest and the stupid. :palm:
 
Abortion should be mandatory for all unintended pregnancies.
Pregnancies should require, on an individual basis, licensing by a government board of family planning experts.

If a mother insists on carrying an accidental baby full term,
the baby should be confiscated by social services and both biological parents should be heavily fined if not incarcerated.

Who could argue with logical reasoning like that? Certainly nobody who isn't intellectually and morally deficient, right?

tenor.gif

triggered.gif
 
Back
Top