mutually assured destruction actually works.
As a deterrent, not as a plan of action to be executed.
mutually assured destruction actually works.
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said it better than any of the court’s external critics. "Will this institution survive the stench this creates in the public perception, that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” she asked during oral arguments on Mississippi’s abortion law on Wednesday. “If people believe this is all politics, how will we survive? How will this court survive?”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...court-faces-an-existential-crisis-legitimacy/
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said it better than any of the court’s external critics. "Will this institution survive the stench this creates in the public perception, that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” she asked during oral arguments on Mississippi’s abortion law on Wednesday. “If people believe this is all politics, how will we survive? How will this court survive?”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...court-faces-an-existential-crisis-legitimacy/
I suspect you wouldn't have your panties in a bunch if 6 of the SC members were all alt-lefties. Now that we have all seen the true side of Garland, I will be sending a cash donation for McConnel's re-election.
I posted basically the same thing.
Soto would not be worried that “the Constitution and its reading are just political acts” if the Court was 5-4 or 6-3 liberal.
She never supports the Constitution...ever.
But she is a "WISE LATINA" ... just ask her
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said it better than any of the court’s external critics. "Will this institution survive the stench this creates in the public perception, that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” she asked during oral arguments on Mississippi’s abortion law on Wednesday. “If people believe this is all politics, how will we survive? How will this court survive?”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...court-faces-an-existential-crisis-legitimacy/
yes, their OWN bodies, not the body of an unborn human being inside their body. But lets pursue your "logic" a little further. and I'm going to ignore your juvenile attempt to insult me.
Using your logic, why shouldn't a mother be able to kill a 2 year old when he or she becomes a financial problem or interferes with her social life? If inconvenience is the criteria for murder, why does it only apply pre birth?
the idiots in Roe used the first amendment (speech) as the criteria for making it legal.
There are two bodies involved...two hearts, two brains...the mother has the right to do what she wants with her own body but not the unborn baby who has rights too.
This will all be settled in a few months and I believe the right for a mother to murder her own child will be restricted...greatly.
I suspect you wouldn't have your panties in a bunch if 6 of the SC members were all alt-lefties. Now that we have all seen the true side of Garland, I will be sending a cash donation for McConnel's re-election.

Indeed... my esposa is a wise Latina...she married me.
Soto is a partisan, totally biased Justice who never defends from deviations to the Constitution.
In God’s eyes, the rights of the mother do not exceed the rights of the child before and after the child is born.
In about six months, the S.C. will say pretty much the same thing.
That doesn't surprise anyone. Make sure to steal from your great grandchildrens' piggy banks to pay for Trump's legal bills too.![]()
The good protectors of the Constitution will rightly rule that the unborn children have rights too.
The “settled law” issue was dealt with by the listing of settled law cases that have been overturned.
There will be no diminishment of women’s rights after the ruling, just their never existent right to murder their own child.
Unwanted children can and are adopted...contraception is available to rich and poor.
The good protectors of the Constitution will rightly rule that the unborn children have rights too.
The “settled law” issue was dealt with by the listing of settled law cases that have been overturned.
There will be no diminishment of women’s rights after the ruling, just their never existent right to murder their own child.
Unwanted children can and are adopted...contraception is available to rich and poor.
The raised in a barn pendejo can take a hike.
His scatological posts scream “look at me...look at me, please.”
Perhaps a neglected child seeking attention, anyway he can get it.