Kyle Rittenhouse

Into the Night said:
:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

It figures that an alt-right coward and BS artist is your hero here. He disappeared right after Jan. 6th, then came back about 2 months later with a new icon...denouncing his years of oather/threeper screeds.

Yet he is STILL posting Lew Rockwell BS.

And again, what part of this video shows the initial point of contact? Who started it?
 
Into the Night said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Squawky is babbling, dear readers. He'll NEVER admit he's wrong, like his god Cheeto Jeezus. But for the rational, objective reader, here's what Squawky is in denial of. Pay attention to section 948.60, then watch Squawky go off the deep end in denial.

WISCONSIN STATE LEGISLATURE

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/sta...tatutes/948/55
Click to expand...


Insult fallacies. Lie. TDS. Buzzword fallacies. Psychoquackery. Special pleading fallacy. Cliche fallacy. Cherry picking fallacy.

Not the entire law, dumbass. You also seem to forget the JUDGE DISMISSED THIS CHARGE.
Click to expand...

No cherry picking, genius.... A matter of fact. That you have a "judge" of questionable objectivity is not surprising who is essentially giving the defense it's case by saying "self defense" trumps any and all violations is unreal. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/11/bruce-schroeder-kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-trial

One could only imagine the shrill squawks from you if it were a BLM sympathizer killing some self appointed "protector" during this past years riots and such.

You're done Squawky. Now, go figure how many more words you can add on to your "fallacy" screech. See ya next month.
 
Taichiliberal said:
It figures that an alt-right coward and BS artist is your hero here. He disappeared right after Jan. 6th, then came back about 2 months later with a new icon...denouncing his years of oather/threeper screeds.

Yet he is STILL posting Lew Rockwell BS.

And again, what part of this video shows the initial point of contact? Who started it?
Click to expand...

Buzzword fallacy. Denial of history. TDS. RQAA.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Squawky is babbling, dear readers. He'll NEVER admit he's wrong, like his god Cheeto Jeezus. But for the rational, objective reader, here's what Squawky is in denial of. Pay attention to section 948.60, then watch Squawky go off the deep end in denial.

WISCONSIN STATE LEGISLATURE

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/55
Click to expand...

Like most liberals, you have serious issues with not doing your homework. You can't just read section 2a of 948.60 and be done with it. There is also 2b-d and 3a-c.

Section 3c of 948.60 very clearly states that "this section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593."

Kyle was NOT in violation of s. 941.28 (possession of short-barreled rifle) and was NOT in violation of ss. 29.304 AND 29.593 ... If I recall correctly, the defense agreed that Kyle was indeed in violation of 29.593, but NOT in violation of 29.304.

Therefore, 948.60 does NOT apply to Kyle and Kyle was LEGALLY carrying the rifle in question.

Learn how to read a complete section of State law before spouting off your nonsense.
 
Nordberg said:
The only people injured were by Rittenhouse. The danger was him.
Click to expand...

it's hardly the fault of rittenhouse that the mob was incompetent at violence against individuals........no matter how hard they tried to kill him.

and yes, after watching the video of kyle defending himself very efficiently, he is a danger............so don't fuck with him
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top