Update on the Rittenhouse trial

Jarod said:
More than what this Prosecutor is doing would be required, I think the judge yelled because he was embarrassed that he knows his prior rulings were unclear and gave the prosecutor a door to run right through, a judge needs to be clear with his words and rulings.
Click to expand...

and I think you're an idiot for thinking that bullshit.........when rittenhouse is acquitted, we'll see how stupid you look
 
PostmodernProphet said:
true.....about a dozen in 42 years.....most of them demanded by tenants who tried to represent themselves in pro per.......like the tenant who demanded a jury trial and then said the landlord was discriminating against him just because he complained the landlord had rented the apartment next door to niggers.....
Click to expand...

So, never against a licensed attorney on the opposing side? Likely mostly a day or two trials?
 
Jarod said:
So, never against a licensed attorney on the opposing side? Likely mostly a day or two trials?
Click to expand...

never had a jury trial last longer than a day.......if you could understand English it would have been clear to you that "most of them in pro per" leaves a balance which would have been against licensed attorneys.......though perhaps in Florida there are "unlicensed" attorneys such as yourself to contend with......so you've handled more jury trials than I have.....though I know I've handled more bench trials than you have, as I stopped counting at 5000, and that was over ten years ago......be that as it may, I apparently handle the bench with more respect than you do, as I always refer to the judge as "Your Honor" and never call him "the bitch who does what I tell him to".......,
 
This case is a gross miscarriage of justice and Unconstitutional pandering to the thugs who threaten to burn the city down.

There is no clearer case of self defense ever in the history of the Republic. Rittenhouse is innocent of the charges. The prosecution is so desperate, their top witness was a criminal pedophile who admitted he held a gun to Rittenhouse's head.

But what should frighten ALL of those who love this country and believe in the Constitutional protections we enjoy, imagine how this despicable prosecutor would have acted had there NOT been dozens of videos documenting the insane rioters attacks on people like Rittenhouse?

Lastly, this loss of life occurred because the Liberal City refused to act. When the police are prevented from doing their jobs of protecting the citizens, then law abiding citizens will take matters into their own hands. What other choices are there?

This is what you get voting for morons in the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses and falling for lie filled narratives from the PHONY media. :sad:
 
Bulletbob said:
I watched that on tv today, the judge is not a happy man with the prosecution , who seem like they are either stupid or have never done a case before its like the skipper and Gilligan are handling the case for the state.
Click to expand...

I'm going with stupid and dishonest. :thumbsup:
 
Jarod said:
More than what this Prosecutor is doing would be required, I think the judge yelled because he was embarrassed that he knows his prior rulings were unclear and gave the prosecutor a door to run right through, a judge needs to be clear with his words and rulings.
Click to expand...

WRONG; the judge was angry because this repugnant prosecutor attempted to use despicable unconstitutional tactics knowing he doesn't have a case and was willing to push it forward anyway due to political pressure.
 
Jarod said:
Lawyers have a part they control and Judges have a part they control, its checks and balances, Judges are not kings.

Its a shitty lawyer who lets the judge take over his province, common mistake of the lawyer. A good lawyer takes his place in the courtroom and protects it from the opposing counsel and from an overreaching judge.

I suspect you have not done many jury trials.
Click to expand...

:legion:
 
PostmodernProphet said:
never had a jury trial last longer than a day.......if you could understand English it would have been clear to you that "most of them in pro per" leaves a balance which would have been against licensed attorneys.......though perhaps in Florida there are "unlicensed" attorneys such as yourself to contend with......so you've handled more jury trials than I have.....though I know I've handled more bench trials than you have, as I stopped counting at 5000, and that was over ten years ago......be that as it may, I apparently handle the bench with more respect than you do, as I always refer to the judge as "Your Honor" and never call him "the bitch who does what I tell him to".......,
Click to expand...

I’ve never called them that… but I’d call “one day trials.” more of an evidentiary hearing than a trial. I’d love to see you in the third week of a real trial.
 
Jarod said:
I’ve never called them that… but I’d call “one day trials.” more of an evidentiary hearing than a trial. I’d love to see you in the third week of a real trial.
Click to expand...

waste of time.......I do work that benefits my clients rather than that which benefits my bank account.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top