judge may allow the men Kyle Rittenhouse shot to be called 'rioters' or 'looters'

SmarterthanYou said:
unless there is other video we haven't seen yet, it's pretty cut and dry
Click to expand...

I think there's more video and audio. Should be interesting.

How many of Kyle's friends went to the Insurrection? Do you think one of them would roll on Kyle for a reduced sentence?

How many in his militia unit? I'm sure they'll all be called to testify along with all other living witnesses.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and we've all seen the videos. hopefully the jury that's picked can interpret them a hell of a lot better than you
Click to expand...

Not sure how those videos show Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense. He didn't remove himself from the situation, he inserted himself into it...so that's not self-defense, that's aggression.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It depends on Wisconsin law and legal precedent. Again, I doubt a prosecutor will tarnish his/her reputation by taking a sure loser as a case. If he didn't have the goods, he'd have taken a plea deal.

No doubt Kyle, being young and stupid, is the perfect "suicide bomber" for the militias by taking this to trial and risking a much larger sentence.

How many of these "aggressors" have been tried already? Arrested?
Click to expand...

Rittenhouse is going to go to jail just like James Fields did, because Rittenhouse is using the same defense Fields used to no success.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Did Casey Anthony empty a magazine into someone?
Click to expand...
no, her crime was much more heinous

Dutch Uncle said:
No, it is not. Yes, some are. Two men are dead, another maimed. Justice demands a reckoning.
Click to expand...

and just like the prosecutor overcharged zimmerman, this prosecutor is overcharging rittenhouse........pure politics. If kyles lawyer is any good, this is over before it starts and you will probably see a guilty plea to one or two misdemeanors for time served
 
SmarterthanYou said:
since I understand bullies much better than you, and watching that video of the first jerkoff bully daring them to shoot him
Click to expand...

It's not against the law to taunt people.

If Rittenhouse is that sensitive, then he shouldn't have had a gun.

Instead of shooting those people, Kyle could have just left.

Why didn't he just leave?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
my guess is that he felt he could threaten and overpower the youngest one he saw.........then paid the price for it.
Click to expand...

So Rittenhouse panicked, then.

He panicked and instead of running away and not shooting anyone, he shot someone.

Of all the choices he could have made, why did he make that one?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I think there's more video and audio. Should be interesting.
Click to expand...
it already is interesting

Dutch Uncle said:
How many of Kyle's friends went to the Insurrection? Do you think one of them would roll on Kyle for a reduced sentence?
Click to expand...
what insurrection?

Dutch Uncle said:
How many in his militia unit? I'm sure they'll all be called to testify along with all other living witnesses.
Click to expand...
you are either being humorously sarcastic, or stupidly indulging in liberal fantasy..........
 
SmarterthanYou said:
what, EXACTLY, was he saying here and who was he saying it to?????? oh, you don't know?
Click to expand...

It doesn't fuckin' matter because he's there with the gun, so his very presence is a taunt and act of intimidation.

He's not even FROM Kenosha, so what the fuck was he even doing there? Being a crisis actor, that's what he was doing there.
 
LV426 said:
Not sure how those videos show Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense. He didn't remove himself from the situation, he inserted himself into it...so that's not self-defense, that's aggression.
Click to expand...

since we have no video prior to that first shooting, we don't know if he inserted himself in to it or felt threatened. you're making idiot assumptions because of your hate and anger
 
LV426 said:
It's not against the law to taunt people.
Click to expand...
you've heard the judicial term of 'fighting words', have you not?

LV426 said:
If Rittenhouse is that sensitive, then he shouldn't have had a gun.
Click to expand...
neither should 1/3rd of all police, yet there they are

LV426 said:
Instead of shooting those people, Kyle could have just left.

Why didn't he just leave?
Click to expand...

it appears that when he tried to leave, a handful of people chased him down and tried to kill him............
 
SmarterthanYou said:
we don't know if he inserted himself in to it or felt threatened
Click to expand...

If he felt threatened, then why didn't he call his mommy to come and pick him up?

Because he did after.

After he killed people, he called his mommy to pick him up.

Why didn't he call his mommy before he decided to shoot people because he was a scared little baby?
 
LV426 said:
So Rittenhouse panicked, then.

He panicked and instead of running away and not shooting anyone, he shot someone.

Of all the choices he could have made, why did he make that one?
Click to expand...

show us the video you have of the first person shot just taunting and not being physically threatening. we'll wait
 
LV426 said:
Rittenhouse is going to go to jail just like James Fields did, because Rittenhouse is using the same defense Fields used to no success.
Click to expand...

Not sure if that is Apples to Apples, but agreed the kid will be doing time. Maybe up to 15 years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top