"We keep marrying other species and ethnics " - Fox News Host

Taichiliberal said:
"slaughtering" a baby translates that a baby, post birth with ambilical cord cut and breathing on it's own, was then murdered by the attending physician. So unless you have proof of this, you're full of it. Anti-abortionist have a bad habit of generalizing terms when it suits them...try not to repeat that BS here.
Click to expand...
as an anti-baby killer, I reject your ridiculous translation of my post....just keep on slaughtering babies and stop altering my statements.....
 
ib1yysguy said:
fetus2.jpg
≠
baby-gown.jpg
Click to expand...


Yes, both examples are the exact same human life, there is no dispute of this. Nothing has to happen to Example #1 to make it Example #2, it already has every single element to make it and define it as a human being. The only difference in Example #1 and Example #2 is stage of development. The only difference between Example #1 and YOU is stage of development and time.
 
"slaughtering" a baby translates that a baby, post birth with ambilical cord cut and breathing on it's own, was then murdered by the attending physician.
Click to expand...

So we are back to square one with you again, where a 'human being' is somehow defined by having a severed umbilical cord, and before that moment, it is physically something besides a living human organism. The problem is, you have presented NO scientific evidence to support your absurd and ridiculous point. The fetus is a living human being from point of conception, deal with THAT fact first, before you start establishing an argument for anything else.
 
Watermark said:
Magic is 100% effective in turning lead into gold. Can you refute that? Yes or no?
Click to expand...

I am unable to refute it or affirm it...I have no knowledge of how to test the thesis......I do know how to test the thesis that abstinence is 100% effective to avoid pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases.....
 
Dixie said:
Sure it does. Your argument is, we don't need to teach our children about the one and only foolproof way to avoid unwanted pregnancy.
Click to expand...

That's not my argument, dishonest piece of crap. I said abstinence ONLY education is ineffective. And it is. Can you refute that? Yes or no?
 
christiefan915 said:
So Iraqi babies and pregnant Iraqi women aren't humans murdered in the war?
Click to expand...
If you're talking about the US military,
Exactly right.....As a rule.....Iraqi babies and pregnant Iraqi women were NOT murdered in the war....

Thats not to deny criminal acts by evil men, be they military or civilian, as happens all over the world at various times.....or accidental causalities in the civilian population, as happens in all wars....
usually caused by enemy using civilians as shields...
 
Last edited:
ib1yysguy said:
That's not my argument, dishonest piece of crap. I said abstinence ONLY education is ineffective. And it is. Can you refute that? Yes or no?
Click to expand...

has anyone here even suggested that we teach abstinence only?.....this whole line of argument on your part is a dishonest piece of crap.....
 
Dixie said:
Your erroneous question is misleading and presumptive, and has nothing to do with this debate. Sorry.
Click to expand...

Translation:

Dixie PWND

lol, YOU were the one that said their view points were valid because they were founded in religious beliefs. I'm simply wondering do you think this extends to all beliefs that are founded in religious doctrine or are you just arbitrarily picking this one.

You said it dummy!
 
Dixie said:
I can refute that. Magic is not reality, it is an illusion. Let's deal with reality, Waterhead!
Click to expand...

And believing that your education causes abstinence is equally in the realm of fantasy. It would require magic. That's the problem with conservatives, they base all their policies on magic.

Let's deal with reality.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I am unable to refute it or affirm it...I have no knowledge of how to test the thesis......I do know how to test the thesis that abstinence is 100% effective to avoid pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases.....
Click to expand...

Yep. Something that is never going to happen is 100% effective at avoiding pregnancy. That's great to know.

Let's get down to reality now. The pill is statistically 100% effective. Give that to them.
 
Honestly, Didn't Palin's daughter demonstrate how abstinence only is not an effective way to teach your children.

How is this even a debate?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top