SmarterthanYou
rebel
because they are corporate protectionists?
fucktard barney frank
- Thread starter SmarterthanYou
- Start date
because they are corporate protectionists?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
excellent point....if the liberals had any connection to the founding fathers they wouldn't need justices capable of changing the constitution into what they want it to say......apparently the founders lacked "empathy"......
SmarterthanYou
rebel
really? how strongly do modern conservatives feel about warrantless wiretaps, warrantless home searches, indefinite detentions?
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
General George Washington was an advocate of guerrilla war.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
yeah, and so am I but that doesn't answer my questions above.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Guerrilla war means that you use any means necessary to beat the enemy during times of war, so it is likely that Washington would have approved, as do I.
ib1yysguy
Junior Member
Washington would have stomped on the constitution. Great.
You don't get to scream all high and mighty about the constitution when you say stuff like this, broseph.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
please provide some context. I have a hard time equating SM's hypothetical fight against tyrants with Washington stomping on the constitution.
ib1yysguy
Junior Member
His ridiculous argument is that Washington would have approved of the violations of the constitution you listed if he was fighting an enemy.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I didn't read it that way, myself. maybe you should try reading it again, objectively.
ib1yysguy
Junior Member
How the fuck could you read this any differently?
In response to you listing the violations of the constitution, he said
Southern Man said:
What the hell is wrong with you?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I guess it's the optimist in me that tends to side with the liberty and freedom tendencies. maybe SM can answer more succinctly.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
The Constitution doesn't protect folks that we are at war with dummy.
ib1yysguy
Junior Member
The US isn't at war with me or you and a lot of other US citizens whom the Constitution DOES protect, yet they violated their constitutional rights by tapping their phones without a warrant. And you defend it. You have NO business talking about how liberals tamp on the constitution when you make arguments like this.
sounds good to me, give it 1 1/2 years and if no real progress, then you can start blaming bho, not that some small minds will not blame him before that
try thinking of the economy as something like a super tanker going at maximum speed...you just cannot turn it around quickly
besides if you try, you may break it...like causing hyperinflation
we need to get away from this boom/bust/boom/bust cycle
try thinking of the economy as something like a super tanker going at maximum speed...you just cannot turn it around quickly
besides if you try, you may break it...like causing hyperinflation
we need to get away from this boom/bust/boom/bust cycle
TuTu Monroe
A Realist
JWC, where were you when the FISA court ruled that the warrantless wiretaps were NOT illegal? Another liberal lie.
TuTu Monroe
A Realist
sounds good to me, give it 1 1/2 years and if no real progress, then you can start blaming bho, not that some small minds will not blame him before that
try thinking of the economy as something like a super tanker going at maximum speed...you just cannot turn it around quickly
besides if you try, you may break it...like causing hyperinflation
we need to get away from this boom/bust/boom/bust cycle
Presidents should not be meddling with the economy, It's not their job and that includes Bush. It only prolongs it. SIGH!!
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Yes, magic will fix it. I'd love to live in the fairy tale land you guys do, but unfortunately for me, I'm stuck squarely in reality.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
ib1yysguy
Junior Member
FISA court is not SCOTUS. They don't determine constitutionality.