OH..THE PRES.MORON FEDS "CITED SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY", DID THEY??
OH NO!! NOT "CITED"??!?!!!
OH....HAVEN'T FILED ANY CHARGES FOR SEDITION....GOT IT.
"Where's the sedition charges if this was an insurrection?""
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
OH..THE PRES.MORON FEDS "CITED SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY", DID THEY??
OH NO!! NOT "CITED"??!?!!!
OH....HAVEN'T FILED ANY CHARGES FOR SEDITION....GOT IT.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Great analysis.
Seems like a solid factual foundation for discrediting an American election.
Trump also got more votes than Obama in 2008. Can you believe that?
Many people around me did not believe Obama or Biden won, either. They make the mistaken assumption that since nobody they knew supported them nobody else could. I also know people who don't think anybody could have supported Trump.
They don't believe polls for the same reason although both 2016 and 2020 polls were right on the money. 2020 had Biden with 52%.
Fraud to get 8 million more votes would obviously have required a lot of people participating. By now somebody would have sold that story for millions. The conspiracy people will probably claim that has not happened because they were threatened or murdered.
I have yet to find one person who couldn't vote due to voter ID or voter suppression, no evidence of voter fraud except the relatively small number of people charged with voting illegally, or no illegal aliens who have voted; yet, most of our posters are convinced of some of these occur.
Kill yourself.
That's because you're not really looking, choosing instead to lazily stand back and wait for people to accommodate your bad faith.
Voter Suppression in 2020
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voter-suppression-2020
US election 2020: Why it can be hard to vote in the US
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54240651
Poll: Despite Record Turnout, 80 Million Americans Didn't Vote. Here's Why
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/15/9450...out-80-million-americans-didnt-vote-heres-why
Block the Vote: How Politicians are Trying to Block Voters from the Ballot Box
https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/block-the-vote-voter-suppression-in-2020/
Court Orders Pennsylvania To Segregate Some Provisional Ballots But Rejects GOP Push To Throw Them Out
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...s-gop-push-to-throw-them-out/?sh=58ab20b048e4
A Georgia law prevented 87,000 people from voting last year.
https://www.apmreports.org/story/2019/10/28/georgia-voting-deadlines-2020-election
Despite record turnout, some Texas voters were still shut out
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/11/06/texas-voting-access-turnout/
Flash is one of these remarkably lazy people who can't be bothered to do any research and only seeks things out that confirm his long-held and inaccurate biases.
That's because you're fucking lazy, as usual.
This took me literally 5 seconds to find in a Google search.
So what's your excuse?
Here we go again. LV426 begins with bigotry, hostility, hate, and poorly researched sources.
Let's look at your articles.
NPR says 80 million people did not vote because:
Nonvoters' reasons for not voting include:
- not being registered to vote (29%)
- not being interested in politics (23%)
- not liking the candidates (20%)
- a feeling their vote wouldn't have made a difference (16%)
- being undecided on whom to vote for (10%)
Another says it was because people did not register by the deadline. Registration with deadlines is common and has been around for decades. A person has years to register but they can't manage to do so by a deadline? And, only Democrats seem to have this problem?
Another says the mail did not deliver her ballot to California. It also lists the pandemic, fear, complex processes, missing absentee ballots, uninformed poll workers, technical issues, registration problems and other hurdles disenfranchised a number of Texans. Issues that occur in almost every election.
Nothing about people who wanted to vote but couldn't due to voting laws. It was because of the pandemic, failing to register, or the fault of others (post office). Even those states recently cutting some of the voting hours still have more time to vote than many of the other states making no changes. Texas has 17 early voting days and Delaware has 10, but Texas is seen as suppressing votes. Anybody who thinks it is difficult to vote in Texas is an uninformed idiot.
LV426 wants to have suppressed voters so he can be a big daddy to the poor victims. I don't think you read your own articles.
And yet, there was record turnout with over 70% of registered voters voting.
Doesn't change my point at all. In fact, it makes the number of people who voted even more incredulous. 74.6%. That is a record for all times.
Doesn't change my point at all. In fact, it makes the number of people who voted even more incredulous. 74.6%. That is a record for all times.
Right, because there isn't automatic voter registration. And the fact that there isn't is voter suppression.
And automatic voter registration is also common, yet not in some states. Why do you think?
First of all, people DO register, and then are purged from the voter rolls. Like the 50,000 purged in GA ahead of the 2018 election.
The problem, Flash, is that registration puts an artificial barrier to entry. And "barrier" is another word for "suppression".
Automatically registering everyone to vote removes that barrier.
So by not automatically registering everyone, you are suppressing the vote because you are adding a barrier to entry (registration, and all the crazy bullshit that comes along with that).
NO!
Not that the mail didn't deliver it, TEXAS DIDN'T SEND IT OUT.
Not sending out a ballot, even after jumping through the hoops to get it requested, is voter suppression.
She was denied her vote because TX didn't send her the requested ballot.
So yeah! There ya go! Voter disenfranchisement by all those means and more, is voter suppression.
Wasn't that what you claimed didn't happen in 2020?
You JUST SAID ONE SENTENCE AGO that voters were disenfranchised, and one of those disenfranchisement tools YOU LISTED were "complex processes" and "registration problems".
From where do you think those complex processes and registration problems came? FROM THE VOTING LAWS, FLASH.
Use your head.
You just proved that voting laws disenfranchise voters.
Flash must be senile because he said this literally in the paragraph before:
Hurdles, like...what?
But why cut the hours at all? What's the purpose of doing that? Obviously to prevent people from voting.
What are the OTHER voting rules in Delaware?
Specifically with regard to mail-in voting?
Does DE make it easier for people to cast their vote by mail than TX does?
Did you bother to do your research into the voting laws of DE? Of course not, because you're lazy.
You have this nasty habit of leaving out exculpatory information like that because it always, always, ALWAYS ruins your argument.
So you wonder stupidly why we aren't accusing DE of suppressing votes, even though they have fewer early voting hours than TX...but you wonder that because you didn't bother to look at DE's other voting laws to see how they compare to TX.
Last edited:
You were literally handed a story about a woman from Texas who never received her absentee ballot because TX never sent it out.
How am I their "big daddy"?
By ensuring that they're registered to vote and can actually cast a ballot.
Yeah...how terrible of me.
Seems to me that you don't want more people voting because it dilutes the influence of your shitty vote.
I read everything before I post it, unlike you, who scans things for information you can pull out of context and then misrepresent on JPP, after contradicting yourself like a moron.
70% is a C-.
The fact that you're satisfied with a C- shows just how lazy and complacent you truly are.
I can pretty much assume that you were a C- student, and a C- associate professor, because you're a C- human being.
C- isn't a brag (unless you're GW Bush), it's barely satisfactory.
An "A" would be a brag.
An "A" would indicate no voter suppression.
But we didn't get an "A" in Texas...we didn't get an "A" anywhere because of "C-" voter suppression.
No one can ever accuse you of having high standards.
Last edited: