Government tightening food safety standards

Whomever

uscitizen alternate login
Government tightening food safety standards


Jul 7, 7:06 AM (ET)

By MARY CLARE JALONICK

WASHINGTON (AP) - New safety standards aimed at reducing salmonella and E. coli outbreaks are part of a government effort to try to make food safer to eat.

A food safety panel established by President Barack Obama developed the new rules for eggs, poultry, beef, leafy greens, melons and tomatoes as well as for better coordination and communication among the agencies overseeing the nation's food supply.

The panel was to announce Tuesday that the Food and Drug Administration and the Agriculture Department would adopt the standards, which follow a string of breakdowns in food safety.

Earlier this year a massive salmonella outbreak in peanut products sickened hundreds, was suspected of causing nine deaths and led to one of the largest product recalls in U.S. history. In the past month, Nestle Toll House cookie dough and 380,000 pounds of beef produced by the JBS Swift Beef Co. of Greeley, Colo., have been recalled due to connections with outbreaks of E. coli.

In March, Obama said he would create a special advisory group to coordinate antiquated food safety laws and recommend ways to update them. The FDA does not have enough money or workers to conduct annual inspections at more than a fraction of the 150,000 food processing plants and warehouses in the country, Obama said.

Under the new rules:

_The FDA will help the food industry establish better tracing systems to track the origins of a bacterial outbreak.

_A new network will be established to help the many agencies that regulate food safety to communicate better.

_Egg and poultry producers will have to follow new standards designed to reduce salmonella contamination.

_The Food Safety Inspection Service, the Agriculture Department agency that inspects meat, will increase sampling of ground beef ingredients in an effort to better find E. coli contamination.

_The FDA will recommend ways that producers of leafy greens, melons and tomatoes can reduce disease strains, and require stricter standards in those industries within two years.

_The FDA and the Agriculture Department also will create new positions to better oversee food safety.

The Agriculture Department inspects meat and poultry, and shares inspections of eggs with the FDA. The FDA inspects most other foods, but at least 15 government agencies are a part of the food safety system.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090707/D999IO7G0.html
 
In March, Obama said he would create a special advisory group to coordinate antiquated food safety laws and recommend ways to update them. The FDA does not have enough money or workers to conduct annual inspections at more than a fraction of the 150,000 food processing plants and warehouses in the country, Obama said.

This is a very good move. The cited section will be the greatest hurdle, however.
 
In March, Obama said he would create a special advisory group to coordinate antiquated food safety laws and recommend ways to update them. The FDA does not have enough money or workers to conduct annual inspections at more than a fraction of the 150,000 food processing plants and warehouses in the country, Obama said.

This is a very good move. The cited section will be the greatest hurdle, however.

A tax/charge on the items being inspected? The question is will the US public pay for safer food?

It is no different than other industries paying for testing to pass safety criteria.
And could lower their insurance rates.
 
In March, Obama said he would create a special advisory group to coordinate antiquated food safety laws and recommend ways to update them. The FDA does not have enough money or workers to conduct annual inspections at more than a fraction of the 150,000 food processing plants and warehouses in the country, Obama said.[quote/]

This is a very good move. The cited section will be the greatest hurdle, however.

A tax/charge on the items being inspected? The question is will the US public pay for safer food?

It is no different than other industries paying for testing to pass safety criteria.
And could lower their insurance rates.[/QUOTE]


LOL
the last sentence is amusing
 
so to make food safer, we're going to increase the number of government jobs (more taxes, bigger budget) and then tax the companies for the extra inspections? (increased food cost at the supermarket)

so now the plan is to starve us out?
 
so to make food safer, we're going to increase the number of government jobs (more taxes, bigger budget) and then tax the companies for the extra inspections? (increased food cost at the supermarket)

so now the plan is to starve us out?

Increased food safety is not free. You support a nanny state government?
I feel that the cost should be incorporated into the cost of the product being inspected.
 
so to make food safer, we're going to increase the number of government jobs (more taxes, bigger budget) and then tax the companies for the extra inspections? (increased food cost at the supermarket)

so now the plan is to starve us out?
In the last decade our inspections have fallen short of keeping people from being poisoned. What do you suggest? No inspection? What should be done is internal policing and if they fuck up then they face criminal sanctions for poisoning people.
 
In the last decade our inspections have fallen short of keeping people from being poisoned. What do you suggest? No inspection? What should be done is internal policing and if they fuck up then they face criminal sanctions for poisoning people.

Agreed. Unless a person is growing all his own food, he has no knowledge of the conditions under which the food is grown, harvested, transported, etc., etc. We nearly all rely entirely on our food safety regulations to ensure that what we eat will not endanger life and limb, or our health in any way. If those food sources are not inspected then in effect we have no regulation. I applaud these efforts to address something that is so basic and essential to our wellbeing.
 
Agreed. Unless a person is growing all his own food, he has no knowledge of the conditions under which the food is grown, harvested, transported, etc., etc. We nearly all rely entirely on our food safety regulations to ensure that what we eat will not endanger life and limb, or our health in any way. If those food sources are not inspected then in effect we have no regulation. I applaud these efforts to address something that is so basic and essential to our wellbeing.

Excellent post.
 
Unfortunately persons hide behind corporation and often no one is punished.

Well the workers and the stockholdres are usually the one that pay.
 
Unfortunately persons hide behind corporation and often no one is punished.

Well the workers and the stockholdres are usually the one that pay.

then we change that law and we remove that idiotic lawyer inspired supreme court decision that gave corporations constitutional rights.
 
so to make food safer, we're going to increase the number of government jobs (more taxes, bigger budget) and then tax the companies for the extra inspections? (increased food cost at the supermarket)

so now the plan is to starve us out?



Agreed. I think government should get out of the way. Corporations can be trusted to police themselves. Regulations just muck up the magic of the markets.

Good call, man. There shouldn’t be any federal food inspectors. They should be fired from their cushy socialist jobs.
 
Back
Top