Hello Jarod,
A death panel told me the other day that the idea of death panels taking over is dead.
Hello Jarod,
A death panel told me the other day that the idea of death panels taking over is dead.
Looks like someone in the RNC made the calculation that there are more LGBTQ ppl and allies than there are anti-SSM/rights ppl in the evangelical contingent. They also saw the writing on the wall as far as their base's demographics go.
Republicans only cared about gay marriage because it was an easy wedge issue to get the closeminded
On the Down Low redneck vote.
If I believe something is genuinely wrong I do not throw in the towel and surrender.
It sounds like GOP leadership always just considered gay marriage a phony culture war issue to motivate the rubes, much like wars on Christmas, critical race theory, and the imminent threat of sharia law
You are shooting blanks. The incest argument didn't work for you from 2000 to 2020, there is no reason to believe it will work for you in 2021
You're trying to equate three different things that are not at all alike. Polygamy and incestuous marriage are still illegal in all 50 states, and have zero to do with SSM. BTW, you forgot to throw in bestiality.![]()
There are plenty of Christians who hate LGBTQ folks, but I think you're right that the RNC only used same sex marriage to manipulate voters. As the past several years have shown us, the RNC doesn't actually have any policy positions. The exist 100% to raise money and buy votes.
I cannot vote in Russia and cannot participate in their civic dialogue.
But saying I am shooting black people will prevent polygamy and incest?
Or do you favor those as well?

You are rage-posting based on what you wish I wrote,not what I actually wrote.So which is it, fuck face? Evangelicals or all conservatives?
Yell at someone else about that. I have gone out of my way to remind lefty that Evangelicals include liberal whites [aka,Jimmy and Roslyn Carter] as well as traditionally black Protestant churches.What's with all you pathetic cunts always saying it's Evangelicals who are so evil?
I support polygamy amongst consenting adults. I do not support it amongst religious nutcases that force their underaged daughters to marry. I don’t feel that it’s any of my business if sister brides want to share a husband.You're trying to equate three different things that are not at all alike. Polygamy and incestuous marriage are still illegal in all 50 states, and have zero to do with SSM. BTW, you forgot to throw in bestiality.![]()
I support polygamy amongst consenting adults. I do not support it amongst religious nutcases that force their underaged daughters to marry. I don’t feel that it’s any of my business if sister brides want to share a husband.
I object to incestuous marriages because of inbreeding and danger to the children produced through those unions. I know a couple in AK that married, they are first cousins and they have two children both who have a lot of physical problems. First cousin marriages are legal in Alaska.
Well I wouldn't say that there are "plenty" (whatever that means) of Christians who hate LGBTQ folks. A good portion of them (usually Fundamentalist Baptists) do. The other part just think it's a sin and could spell doom for this country and this world. (Which doesn't even make any sense because I would think they would want Jesus to return.)
As to the GOP existing to raise money and buy votes, I agree. Policies on abortion and SSM show that.
Same sex relations are not marriages. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Between a man and a woman, procreation (in principle) is possible. That possibility is nonexistent in gay relationships, thus gay "marriage" is meaningless. Attempting to sexualize man-man/woman-woman relations is a perversion of marriage, as those types of relations can only ever be platonic in their end result (as procreation is impossible).When I started on this forum this was one of the most prominent and high-profile debate topics; liberals holding that same-sex marriage should be legal, conservatives largely claiming that it was immoral or would portend the doom of traditional marriages.
Hate the sin and not the sinner? I guess I can buy that. Whether they hate LGBTQ people or LGBTQ activities, I regard it rather the same. Irrational judgment is a cornerstone of most religions.
Same sex relations are not marriages. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Between a man and a woman, procreation (in principle) is possible. That possibility is nonexistent in gay relationships, thus gay "marriage" is meaningless. Attempting to sexualize man-man/woman-woman relations is a perversion of marriage, as those types of relations can only ever be platonic in their end result (as procreation is impossible).
That's how I explained to them IRL.
Being gay is a part of their personhoods. Hating the "sin" of being gay is hating the gay "sinner".
Then I think my original statement stands: "There are plenty of Christians who hate LGBTQ folks."
It is well known that the people who oppose same sex marriage and homosexuality the most, especially evangelicals, have homosexual tendencies themselves and often act on them in secret. I should know.
Same sex relations are not marriages. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Between a man and a woman, procreation (in principle) is possible. That possibility is nonexistent in gay relationships, thus gay "marriage" is meaningless. Attempting to sexualize man-man/woman-woman relations is a perversion of marriage, as those types of relations can only ever be platonic in their end result (as procreation is impossible).