You could make $5,000,000 dollars.

ExpressLane said:
Y voting systems you obviously have not been watching OOOPS :rofl2: The voting system that they hack at the symposium was a private voting system that was set up with the same type of components that were used in the public voting system.
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO. So you are saying they set up a fake system with an easily cracked password and that proves that real election systems use easily cracked passwords?

You are pretty gullible.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO. So you are saying they set up a fake system with an easily cracked password and that proves that real election systems use easily cracked passwords?

You are pretty gullible.
Click to expand...
No it was set up the same way as the real election . But regardless it shows our system is venerable to attack. The US has programs that assist them in cracking passwords you can bet China has the same. uh?
 
AProudLefty said:
Yes in biology classes and such. And from reading books on my own.
Click to expand...
I took forensic classes in pathology class. It was taught by Dr. Nizam Peerwani the Tarrant County ME. He was the most interesting professor that I ever had. He had great slides. Sometimes gruesome but always interesting.
 
ExpressLane said:
No it was set up the same way as the real election . But regardless it shows our system is venerable to attack. The US has programs that assist them in cracking passwords you can bet China has the same. uh?
Click to expand...

The funny thing about cracking the password of a WIFI router is that you have to be within range of the router. (about 150 feet.) Somehow I think China is a little too far away for any WIFI signal from the US.

Hey, but maybe you can prove me wrong and show us evidence of Chinese military with smart phones in the room as people in the US were voting.

The second thing about WIFI passwords is that a weak password can be cracked in minutes, a strong password can take a thousand years. If the router was set up with some pretty simple protection that drops attempted connections after a certain number of attempts, it would only take a few million years unless you have a million phones to cycle through as each one is locked out. We have no way of knowing if the fake system used the same protection and level of password complexity that the actual system did. They didn't show anything other than it's possible to set up the system wrong.
 
AProudLefty said:
Question: Why do they want Trump to be President again so badly? I don't get it.
Click to expand...
Less illegal immigration, lower inflation, less fighting in the mid east, Lower unemployment pre COVID, more transparent, Not compromised by China, Energy independence, prison reform , financial support for historically black colleges, to name just a few things.
 
ExpressLane said:
If you can prove Mike Lindell's data on the hacked election is fake. Lindell is putting on a cyber symposium August 10-12th his election data will be presented and cyber experts are who encouraged to examine it for authenticity. If its fake then they can claim the $5,000,000 prize money. So you JPP Liberal geniuses that say there was no fraud here is your chance to be millionaires. :thinking:


More information can be found here.

https://home.frankspeech.com/content/mike-lindells-cyber-symposium-2021

Its about to get real.
Click to expand...

Lindell is another deadbeat just like Donald Trump.
 
Darth Omar said:
Some would say the same about routers.
Click to expand...

As explained earlier.
One could say the same thing about Donald Trump's tax returns.

But the thing is, routers are like Donald Trump's tax returns. There is a lot of sensitive information there that has nothing to do with the question you are asking. The reason is not because they are hiding the answer to your question but because the amount of sensitive data that could cause damage to legal and legitimate functions far outweighs your lack of evidence used to request the router.

In the case of the data that wasn't turned over, they offered $5,000,000 if anyone could prove it fake and then refused to give anyone the chance to look at it.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The funny thing about cracking the password of a WIFI router is that you have to be within range of the router. (about 150 feet.) Somehow I think China is a little too far away for any WIFI signal from the US.
Click to expand...
Anyone with a cell phone can be in range plus even a nest thermostat can be used to gain entry.

Hey, but maybe you can prove me wrong and show us evidence of Chinese military with smart phones in the room as people in the US were voting.

The second thing about WIFI passwords is that a weak password can be cracked in minutes, a strong password can take a thousand years. If the router was set up with some pretty simple protection that drops attempted connections after a certain number of attempts, it would only take a few million years unless you have a million phones to cycle through as each one is locked out. We have no way of knowing if the fake system used the same protection and level of password complexity that the actual system did. They didn't show anything other than it's possible to set up the system wrong.
Click to expand...
The government has other ways into computers. Plus China actually made the wireless board that went in to Dominion EMS machines. I'm confident that if they wanted in our system they got into it. They have hacked all the personal data of virtually every federal employee. They have a huge number of gifted hackers that for nothing but hack US computers. Don't be naive .
 
ExpressLane said:
Anyone with a cell phone can be in range plus even a nest thermostat can be used to gain entry.

The government has other ways into computers. Plus China actually made the wireless board that went in to Dominion EMS machines. I'm confident that if they wanted in our system they got into it. They have hacked all the personal data of virtually every federal employee. They have a huge number of gifted hackers that for nothing but hack US computers. Don't be naive .
Click to expand...

I thought that you're a medical doctor, so are you an electrical engineer also?????????????????????
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
As explained earlier.
One could say the same thing about Donald Trump's tax returns.

But the thing is, routers are like Donald Trump's tax returns. There is a lot of sensitive information there that has nothing to do with the question you are asking. The reason is not because they are hiding the answer to your question but because the amount of sensitive data that could cause damage to legal and legitimate functions far outweighs your lack of evidence used to request the router.

In the case of the data that wasn't turned over, they offered $5,000,000 if anyone could prove it fake and then refused to give anyone the chance to look at it.
Click to expand...
They displayed the data on Lindell's website. Did you try to prove it was fake?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top